Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes, It is high time to check usage of the term terrorism.
|
1
|
VS |
0
|
No, the term, terrorism, is used in its actual sense.
|
 |
Akash
| Argues in support of
"Yes, It is high time to check usage of the term terrorism."
| 2 years ago
|
|
Now, terrorism is just a tool in the hand of the state to wash its hands, betray its people, and attack a community or group or religion. The descretion which the state enjoys is highly dangerous.
|
|
Debate: "Who is the real TERRORIST? State, Rival State or the Subjects?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
37
|
VS |
22
|
No
|
|
|
John Jacob
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 1 year ago
|
|
It is not that we do not have strong laws, we do have strong laws but we do not have a strong will to enforce those laws. The system (political parties, government,law enforcement, the tilt towards socialism, social shaming and threatening people...
|
|
|
|
Akash
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
Terrorism is an US sponsored term which allows the state to classify crime into two heads. It also takes away the burden of the proof from the state because any act of crime, if branded as a terrorist act, will convince the public and all the state...
|
|
 |
Viktor Stephen
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Terrorism cannot be checked by passing laws alone. Law makers will make the law, but who will enforce the law? and who will ensure speedy justice. The need of the hour is police and judicial reforms. We need a modern and effective police force...
|
|
Debate: "Has India been vulnerable to terrorism for absence of a strong law" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
21
|
VS |
11
|
No
|
|
|
Bodhi Satwa Roy
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 10 months ago
|
|
Anti-Terrorism laws need a slight tweaking.Ther should no trials, no courts and a single judgement - Death sentence with a bullet. Result - Faster disposal of cases, fair judgement and of course lot savings of taxpayers' money.
|
|
|
|
Akash
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
The laws instead of revamping should be repealed. It is high tim,e for us to learn from the TADA and POTA experience
|
|
 |
Rajeev Khare
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Yes it needs a revamp badly, like in the UK, the Terrorism Act 2006, which was enacted after the July 7 2005 London bombings, allows detention for 28 days of any suspect without any charges. This will help prevent terrorism in a broader way..
|
|
Debate: "Should India revamp its Anti-Terrorism Laws??" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
37
|
VS |
22
|
No
|
|
|
John Jacob
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 1 year ago
|
|
It is not that we do not have strong laws, we do have strong laws but we do not have a strong will to enforce those laws. The system (political parties, government,law enforcement, the tilt towards socialism, social shaming and threatening people...
|
|
|
|
Akash
| Argues in support of
| 2 years ago
|
|
Terrorism is an US sponsored term which allows the state to classify crime into two heads. It also takes away the burden of the proof from the state because any act of crime, if branded as a terrorist act, will convince the public and all the state...
|
|
|
|
Viktor Stephen
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Terrorism cannot be checked by passing laws alone. Law makers will make the law, but who will enforce the law? and who will ensure speedy justice. The need of the hour is police and judicial reforms. We need a modern and effective police force...
|
|
Debate: "Has India been vulnerable to terrorism for absence of a strong law" deleted from your view.
Follow me on
