Create knowledge
[?]
|
(rate this)
|
Hyperinflation Index Puts Zimbabwe Inflation at 89.7 Sextillion Percent Zimbabwe is the first country in the 21st century to hyperinflate. Hyperinflation Index for Zimbabwe Date Index Monthly Inflation Rate Annual Inflation Rate 5-Jan-07 1.00 13.70% 2-Feb-07 1.78 77.60% 2-Mar-07 3.14 76.70% 5-Apr-07 6.90 56.20% 4-May-07 6.75 -2.15% 1-Jun-07 20.70 207.00% 6-Jul-07 53.00 60.40% 3-Aug-07 49.10 -7.29% 7-Sep-07 82.50 70.60% 5-Oct-07 219.00 165.00% 2-Nov-07 642.00 193.00% 28-Dec-07 2,010.00 61.50% 215,000% 25-Jan-08 2,250.00 11.80% 29-Feb-08 8,260.00 259.00% 28-Mar-08 17,700.00 115.00% 25-Apr-08 57,100.00 222.00% 30-May-08 442,000.00 498.0...
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Commented
| 3 years ago
|
|
Update on Zimbabwe Inflation ---------------------------- Zimbabwe Inflation percentage reaches 67 followed by 107 zeros.... Making Zimbabwe withe most number of trillionaires in the world.....Standing ovation to Mugabe and ZANU-PF, without them...
|
|
Trends: "Zimbabwe Inflation at 89.7 Sextillion Percent " deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
1
How will you Diversify your risk in Stock Marekt
2
Financial planner
 |
Binay Kumar Singh
| Added idea
"How will you Diversify your risk in Stock Marekt"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Simple Fund According to Your age One should decide his / her risk Appitide.A 20 year old young boy should invest 80% of the capital in Diversified Equity Mutual Fund or In Pure Equity and 20% in Safe Funds or In Dedts Funds or Bank F.D.AND 60...
|
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Added idea
| 3 years ago
|
|
Another way to tackle the risk and to stop the losses is to have a stop loss on every stock at a percentage of the average cost price, so if there is a stock meltdown like the one which we are having right now, then you can at least be reasonably...
|
|
Ideate: "How will you Diversify your risk in Stock Marekt??" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
1
Stick to your current investment
2
Technical Analysis
 |
Manish N Chugh
| Added idea
"Invest in domestically driven sectors and stocks!!"
| 2 years ago
|
|
I feel there is huge potential for Indian markets to grow gradually from here. I am telling this based on our economic growth and the upcoming global cues. However, seeing our domestic growth henceforth, one should stick to most of the stocks...
|
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Added idea
| 3 years ago
|
|
This will be a defensive approach, but will help you reduce losses. In this case you can plan well and go ahead with smart investment.
|
|
 |
Abhay Dodiya
| Supported idea
" Stick to your current investment"
| 2 years ago
|
|
Market May go up or down it's more about market movement but if strong on your fundamental and have passions than there is no need to move according to market.
|
|
Ideate: "With the current turmoil in the equity markets worldwide, what is going to be your strategy? " deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Smart
|
1
|
VS |
2
|
Foolish
|
 |
SR Sham Sunder
| Argues in support of
"Foolish"
| 3 years ago
|
|
There is no argument - businesses need credit. The question is adequacy and quality of credit. Lets look at a person who does business without credit. He would be reluctant to transact his business transparently. If he has a large turnover...
|
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Argues in support of
"Smart"
| 3 years ago
|
|
To run the business you need money. When you start your own business you need to obtain funds, initial investments in your business. Before obtaining them you need to have the financial plan on how that money will be managed. The credit management...
|
|
|
|
Varun Sood
| Argues in support of
"Foolish"
| 3 years ago
|
|
In the short run, it can be very dangerous to run a business on credit. Unless you have a business that's generating excess revenue right out of the gate which is quite rare I think it's very difficult to start a business today without some kind...
|
|
Debate: " Businesses running businesses on credit - Foolish or Smart?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
2
|
VS |
2
|
No
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
I think that Fannie and Freddie debt should be easy to sell, while the loans to holders of asset-backed securities are temporary by design. Plus the Fed has to act boldly: This shock is in many ways more complex and harder to deal with than the...
|
|
|
|
Gandhi Rajan
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
I believe this is going a bit too far. Fed is buying, or accepting as loan collateral, assets that no one else wants. The danger of this approach, he says, will become clear when the economy starts to strengthen. At that point the Fed will need...
|
|
 |
Alok Kumar Singh
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
I think the situation demands such a step to be taken. The credit crunch is so severe that the Fed has been forced to go beyond its peacetime role of guiding the economy by steering short-term interest rates . With banks weakened and afraid to...
|
|
Debate: "Should the Fed's $800 billion plan be the cause for any concern?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
2
|
VS |
2
|
No
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Present difficulties are, to a large extent, of India’s own making. Before the beginning of the era of economic liberalisation it had depended largely on domestic savings plus concessional foreign borrowings whose consequences were disliked by...
|
|
|
|
Varun Sood
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Forex reserves have declined from their peak of$316 billion in the wake of unabated portfolio outflows. A consideration of whether India needs to raise dollar funds leads us to ask how vulnerable the economy is, how important dollar resources are...
|
|
|
|
Alok Kumar Singh
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Undoubtedly, India must raise and maintain dollar funds to meet future exigencies. This is obvious from the impact of the ongoing global economic crisis. India, dependent on foreign capital inflows since 1990s is facing a big shortfall in them.
|
|
Debate: "Should India raise dollar funds?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
3
|
VS |
5
|
No
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Argues in support of
| 3 years ago
|
|
The downside of allowing FII’s is that they link us to global markets and bring some of the riskier global practices into our markets, as we are experiencing currently. One other route of getting foreign capital would be to allow corporates and...
|
|
 |
Santosh Bhosle
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Over the past five years, portfolio flows into India have been ~$70 billion. Currently, FIIs hold close to ~17% of Indian market capitalisation versus ~50% with promoters and ~13% with Indian institutional investors. Hence, FIIs are an important...
|
|
 |
Japan Shah
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 2 years ago
|
|
FII is mostly for a speculative purpose, they will invest and sell the investment once the see profits.. FII do not add to capital much.. I believe that FDI should be the main source for external capital as it invests into the business and also...
|
|
Debate: "Should FIIs be our main source of external capital" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
1
Debt-equity ratio
2
Positive operating cash flow
|
|
Varun Sood
| Added idea
"Dividends"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Being a shareholder, I am only interested in investments. A company which consistently pays dividends implies it’s rewarding its shareholders. Preference should always be given to a company with higher dividend yield. Higher the yield more is the...
|
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Added idea
| 3 years ago
|
|
I think this is a very vital tool to measure a company’s leverage. A low debt-equity ratio is generally preferred, but is not always necessary. Companies in capital-intensive sectors like infrastructure, real estate, cement, steel and oil gas...
|
|
Ideate: "Think Smart and making mega bucks? How ?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
2
|
VS |
3
|
No
|
 |
Satish Pandey
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
What my friends are stating here is just an operational part of it. For starters: that $700 billion doesn't exist. It would have to be borrowed. Handing it out to people would be exactly like throwing a party and putting it on your credit...
|
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Argues in support of
| 3 years ago
|
|
I would like to support Mr. Ranjan views. In order to compete for the contracts to buy and sell mortgage-backed securities (MBS) under the plan, companies must oversee at least $100 billion in US dollar-denominated, fixed-income assets for clients....
|
|
|
|
Gandhi Rajan
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Nearly a month later, the plan remains under wraps and money managers say it could have a fundamental flaw – only a handful of the biggest investors are qualified to run the program. It was designed as the core part of a $700 billion rescue...
|
|
Debate: "Is the US bailout working?" deleted from your view.
|
(rate this)
|
|
Yes
|
2
|
VS |
1
|
No
|
|
|
Alok Kumar Singh
| Argues in support of
"Yes"
| 3 years ago
|
|
I agree because the bailout package does not solve the problems of the economy but nevertheless it is a necessary thing to do so we can stop the collapse, More banks could fail if distressed financial assets are not taken off their balance sheets...
|
|
|
|
Ashim Chowdhury
| Argues in support of
"No"
| 3 years ago
|
|
Banks don't Care about their average income or small business customers in generals sense as long they are good in credit ratings or scores. Only interest is how to pull from their customers -cards, loans and others with a ...hidden service fees,...
|
|
Debate: "Will the bank bail-outs save economies from depression?" deleted from your view.
Follow me on
