Yes, At stake is lives of the offender and mostly other innocent passers-by. There is nothing more important than lives. Most of the time it is the urge to show off, rather than any exigency that makes people use cells while driving. If really such important call needs to be attended, one can always stop at a side and attend the call in a crisp manner or even better call back when out of traffic, than put the life of self and others in danger.
By
M. Prabhakar Rao, Author of "Mayhem Of The Miserables!", http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/52075
| 03 27 2010 04:33:55 +0000
It has to be remembered at the outset that by driving we obviously mean driving on Public roads! not our own private road on our property. So, it goes withiout saying that we are responsible for the safety of our fellow humanbeings who too are using the same road. Talking on the cellphone while driving is extrememly harardous and a sure bet for accidents. Hence the punishment in my opinion shoud be severe so that it will act as deterrent for rash and irresponsible driving
By
Raghavendran , Teacher, MES College
| 11 12 2009 18:12:15 +0000
Stricter punishment will ensure that there is no Bribing which takes place, today we pay bribe and it is our mistake. We encourage the police in taking bribe, how many times have we said to the cops that you charge me and i will pay the fine at a court. Not even once and hence they take bribe. We are to be blamed and not the government.
By
Kiran Jain, Senior manager Key Corporates, HDFC Bank Ltd
| 11 12 2009 17:06:37 +0000
It is important to have strict punishment, as this will stop people from using mobile phone while driving. Today they charges Rs.200 - 400 for such instances and as we have money we dont bother much in paying such small amount. Why should we have such a strict Punishment ? it is for our safety and for the safety of the who is driving behind us, we all have some one or the other waiting for us at home or at office and it is important that we make it a point that we meet them.
By
Kiran Jain, Senior manager Key Corporates, HDFC Bank Ltd
| 11 12 2009 17:04:13 +0000
It is improtant for drivrs to realise that by talikng on the phone they are endangering the lives of OTHERS - over which they have no right. Hence no punishment is too much for such offenders.
By
Rakesh Amit, Regional IT Head, Dena Bank
| 11 12 2009 15:01:04 +0000
such an enforcement is definately required to bring some soberiety to the streets which currently is nearly invisible,but such a amendments should be backed with effective/in fact honest implementation system.until such an attitude is persist with our traffic personnels this one would be of minisicule importance.
By
kawaljit kaur, pgdbm student , Mount Carmel Institute of Management
| 11 12 2009 04:48:59 +0000
Necessity is there. Till date we only had fine as punishments. Unless me make punishment as a long time imprisonment, these violations won't stop. If 1-2 people of this kind are imprisoned, others will automatically come in line.
By
Kavitha Shankar, Sr/Principal Coresspondent, ABC
| 11 11 2009 09:57:31 +0000
|
This is just another destructive weapon in the demons hand. I am sure this is not going to help anybody except those who wants to harass the common people. Especially in places like Banglore, traffic cannot move faster than 20 Kmph in many of the roads at peak time and more over there is no enough provision on the road where someone can pull over, stop and take the call when it is an urgent one, even if there is a provision heavy traffic may not permit to utilise it. Even before a rule is implemented enough arrangements need to be made to help who doesn’t want to break it. This is in a way driving law abiding citizens to be not that anymore and force them lose all their belief in the legal system.
By
Sreekumar , CEO/MD/Director, Amom Technologies
| 11 12 2009 20:04:07 +0000
This is just another destructive weapon in the demons hand. I am sure this is not going to help anybody except those who wants to harass the common people. Especially in places like Banglore, traffic cannot move faster than 20 Kmph in many of the roads at peak time and more over there is no enough provision on the road where someone can pull over, stop and take the call when it is an urgent one, even if there is a provision heavy traffic may not permit to utilise it. Even before a rule is implemented enough arrangements need to be made to help who doesn’t want to break it. This is in a way driving law abiding citizens to be not that anymore and force them lose all their belief in the legal system.
By
Sreekumar , CEO/MD/Director, Amom Technologies
| 11 12 2009 20:00:51 +0000
This is just another destructive weapon in the demons hand. I am sure this is not going to help anybody except those who wants to harass the common people. Especially in places like Banglore, traffic cannot move faster than 20 Kmph in many of the roads at peak time and more over there is no enough provision on the road where someone can pull over, stop and take the call when it is an urgent one, even if there is a provision heavy traffic may not permit to utilise it. Even before a rule is implemented enough arrangements need to be made to help who doesn’t want to break it. This is in a way driving law abiding citizens to be not that anymore and force them lose all their belief in the legal system.
By
Sreekumar , CEO/MD/Director, Amom Technologies
| 11 12 2009 19:51:50 +0000
6 months imrisonment is surely tooo much for a crime, rather i prefer calling it an offence, like this. Though we have many other penalities in place to avoid such offences, the problem does not seem to be solving on account of wrong implementation. Further, a fine of Rs. 2000 would be of no use. It is so very easy to get away with a bribe to the cop. An imprisonment of 3-7 days seems to be justified.
By
Swati Kanodia, MBA/PGDM student, Banasthali University
| 11 12 2009 17:36:41 +0000
I think 6 months of imprisonment is too much. However, 2000 bucks of fine every time the driver is caught talking on cell phone should definitely discourage him / her from attempting such traffic violations. Also, this must be enforced strictly without giving in to bribery. That is enough to stop such violations.
By
Hari Prasad K, Head - Managed Services & IT Solutions
| 11 12 2009 10:46:49 +0000
Hi..This is pavan, new to this network. however, I feel that 6 months & 2000/- is too much. If rules are not implemented properly at any stage, what is the use of implementing new ? I beleive following the existing rules strictly & implementing them is more than enough than new onew.
By
Pavan Bodapati, Assistan Manager HR, Seanergy Softech Pvt Ltd
| 11 12 2009 07:37:50 +0000
Sufficient laws are there, its we the people first should inculcate the desired discipline. 'Chelta hai', '50/100 de denge' wont go. Its everybody, you can see, from thelewala to the educated one, all spitting on roads, even killing innocent people who dont have a roof of there own & hence sleep roadsides, with there BMW's & still were out hands of law until & unless people (media) woke-up. We all should be responsible; police, us, everyone.
By
ujjval jain, Retail, Retail
| 11 11 2009 11:49:26 +0000
|