Starting April 1, 2010, a lot of you might see new salary structures. So, now is a good time to discuss about CTC which is the total direct salary cost faced by a company to employ us. Along with fixed compensation like our basic salary, allowances and perks, it includes other variable components like bonuses and incentive-driven commissions. Finally, social security payments made on our account, by our employer or compulsorily by us, also form a part of our CTC (for instance, our employer’s contribution or our contribution to your provident fund).
So users, do you think, employers are right in using CTC as a measure of employee cost?
Actually, what we see in our CTC does not readily translate into what we get in hand. We take home is the aggregate of all payable monetary components, minus deductions like social security contributions and taxes on income. The cumulative effect of the recent changes in personal taxation now puts a higher burden on the individual taxpayer. Previously, certain benefits that you received from your employer were taxed to your employer under the fringe benefit tax (FBT). For most of these items the tax rate was 6.79%, and our employer would pass on the economic cost of this to us. So I feel its not right in using CTC as a measure of employee cost.
It's true that whatever we see in CTC and what we get in hand there is a difference, but we must appreciate now a days company's are giving Monthly in hand also in the Offer letter. See from company's point of view CTC includes the exact amount he is paying for the particular individual after deducting professional tax and Provident fund. It is just not possible for them to understand how much amount will be taxable after deducting all the tax exemptions.
Employers view it as the cost of one of the factors of production that is human resources. It is the accounting principle which lead the employer to use CTC as a measure of Employees cost.
Yes, I don't see any wrong in this. It is important for employer as well an employee to know everything and it does not really help anybody to stay unclear....
Also, It does not really matter b'cos if one was expecting say Rs. 10,000 as take home but employer gives him CTC structure, he could very well may ask/get more than that but everything should happen transparently and i really don't see anything wrong in this.......though at times when mgt. is not aware of total CTC structure, employees do get some advantages but they r all short term.....
THE EMPLOYER SHD KNOW WHAT IS THE COST TO HIM, sIMULTANEOUSLY THE EMPLOYEE SHD KNOW THE CORRECT TAKE HOME PAY WITH THE DETAILS OF OTHER COSTS TAKEN IN TO ACCOUNT BY THE EMPLOYER.
from employer's point of view it is correct.They should know what exactly is the cost of employing one including all and sundry cost.Employees always grumble that one gets paid low forgetting all the cost of perquisites.If one exactly know the total cost which depicts the actual picture it will be clear.regarding the taxation part it is upto the salried to fight against the stepmotherly treatment meted to them by all parties/govts.
The cost of an employee need to be measured in relation to the contribution of an employee. In fact both employer and employee are contributing for growth and profitability of the company. Hence contributions of both made in any forms need to be considered to arrive at any decision with regard to over or under payment.
All costs should not be associated to Employee as if there is not other costs, what you paying to Employee should be like benchmark and it should be Employee's earnings.
and ctc or compensation should be going to Employee and clearly describe what is the take home money.
it is something like seeing a object from different views , if you look for employers point of view it may be one tool they use , but if you look it from employee point of view it is not. i think it is not the right way , every individual is different sometime you have to ignore the tools it all depends the need of the hour.if the business requirement is like then they adjust and in other time when there is no urgency then they use this kind of tools . in my view they should always look for new things / tools to attract.why i am saying so .......i have experience of both , i started my career in 1983 and up to march 2002 i was in job , after that i am in business.
I would say that the various taxes paid by the employees to the Govt. is actually a cost incurred by the company and is paid to the exchequer. It cannot be classified as a CTC on behalf of the employee. Instead the companies should take the actual payments made to the employees only as CTC (direct cost)
What is important is the take home salary as a percentage of CTC. The employers have to offer tax-efficient options as a part of the company’s salary structure, to maximise the cash in hand. Every company will have its own range of options that they can offer, depending upon its internal accounting policies and interpretations of the tax code. The closer the take home to the CTC, the better the CTC parameter for measuring cost.
The package should be given very clearly with lot of transperency...In ctc..no body can understand what is what..most the time,the employer using this as a chance to catch hold some thing after the employee accepts the offer.
As u said,the salary package, should be very clear and transperent..
Do not provide photocopies of both the sides of the credit card to anyone. This is because the card verification value (CVV), which is required for online transactions, is printed on the reverse of the card. Anyone can use the card for online...
Black money results in transfer of funds from India to foreign countries through clandestine channels. Such transfers are made possible by violations exchange regulations through the device of under – invoicing of exports and over-invoicing of imports...
Starting April 1, 2010, a lot of you might see new salary structures. So, now is a good time to discuss about CTC which is the total direct salary cost faced by a company to employ us. Along with fixed compensation like our basic salary,...