Banks must satisfy regulatory capital requirements that are intended to ensure they can sustain reasonable losses. Large banks should face higher capital requirements than small banks.The failure of a large national bank, is almost certain to have a bigger impact on the banking system and the wider economy. Capital requirements for a bank should increase with the proportions of its debt that is short term. Capital requirements also depends on the liquidity of the assets held by a bank.
By
shome suvra chakraborty, costing &MIS, Patton International Ltd
| 01 18 2010 04:09:25 +0000
Yes. We have a very stringent system for provisioning. This will not allow the Banks to make their bottom line rosy.
By
RAVI P, Zonal Head, Private Bank
| 01 15 2010 06:07:45 +0000
CFSA assessment confirms that Indian Banks are Financially Robust. and their reasoning . As of March, 2009, the capital adequacy ratio of Indian banks stood at 13.98 per cent, thanks to the high capital adequacy ratio maintained by private and foreign banks. Although government-owned banks have relatively lower ratios, they are still quite comfortable.
By
Soorain Vahie, Freelancer, Consulting
| 01 14 2010 17:23:26 +0000
Yes, i very much feel our Banking sector is financial robust and quite healthy in the current scenario. Thanks to the stringent terms and conditions (policies) set across to the Indian banks by the RBI. And i dont have to explain much about this, the fantastic example is the incident happened world wide the last year and the RBI policies acted as a high protective shield against all such incidents. Appreciate the way RBI is with our banking sector. ....Thank you, Manish N Cheers!!
By
Manish N Chugh, Officer Trainee, Stock Holding Corporation of India ltd.,
| 01 14 2010 15:04:56 +0000
Indian banks are financially robust becoz as we've seen in last two decades, banking sectors perform well, despite some political & fund-credit crisis statement which are low as when, govt policy towards repo & slr rate have been changed. not more ideas to debate on any points......
By
nagnath gawade, Accounts Executive/Accountant, will tell u later
| 01 14 2010 13:57:53 +0000
Though i dont call Indian Banks as Robust yet, they are certainly very strong. We are all aware what happened to some of the Big Financial Instutions of the so called Developed Countries & such big fall could not have any negative effect on our banking system. Did anybody predict the fall of Lehmann & his many brothers & Sisters...! Our Banks are built on a strong fundamentals,basics. Every bank has strong lending principles & most banks have their NPAs under control. Probably some cosolidation will make our Banks Robust.
By
Prashanth Urs, Consultant, Dhruva Advisers Pvt Ltd
| 01 14 2010 12:43:53 +0000
The Risk Capacity of bank is also needed to be considered while releasing liquidity. In fact it is the base for calculating risk appetite.
Banking sector employees also have marketing & sales teams and are given targets on yearly basis. The employee has to work within the stipulated guidelines set for releasing loan. But again to achieve sales targets, the marketing team goes back to the management asking for exemption in order to achieve targets set. The senior managers of marketing team try to convince management to release loans to important customer accounts on case to case basis and it becomes benchmark for the next proposal also, which is not healthy for every case and may lead to default. Though market conditions and estimates may be quantifiable but they cant be banked upon totally, hence though the sales team may have put necessary checks to assess repayment capacity of the customer, the return from retail/corporate account largely depends on success of their ultimate business. Luckily indian PSU banks dont totally rely on estimates but are conventional in their methodology to assess creditworthyness of a firm, which has kept them robust amidst economic crisis world over.
By
pranav patwardhan, Territory Officer-Direct Sales, Hindustan Petroleum
| 01 14 2010 11:54:25 +0000
|
It is not true that Indians banks are more financially robust than big foreign banks. Rashmi In recession Indian banks are less effected not due to more financially robust but due to credit risk policy. In India to get loan is not easy even for deserving candidate if he doesn't belongs to proper financially background or any asset/property. Means LAP is much popular than business loans. We can say that Indian banks are less risky in crisis than foreign banks but not more financially robust.
By
Vipin Bhasin, Private Equity/Hedge Fund/VC-Manager, Indian Investment Co.
| 06 01 2010 20:27:55 +0000
Currently the banks are more reactive than proactive. Indian Banks need to work upon their infrastructure needs. The current infra doesnot support to be robust enough to support current needs. The infra is very far behind when compared to other companies. Also there is lot of difference in culture,they way the support is provided outside office between Indian and International Banks. Lot of support from Infra and application is required..
By
Rachamadugu Pramod, Business Analyst, ICICI Bank Ltd
| 01 20 2010 16:36:41 +0000
U did not ask whether banks in India ( there is one PSU bank named : Indian Bank ) are sound or not. Surely Indian banks are not 'robust' in comparison to (the-then) big banks of the world. Noted that some of such big banks of the globe has been 'wind-up' by now. Question is : is robost are sound Banks ? Not necessarily. It is the approach, risk-aversion policy of the Bank. For gurnering profit, quick profit, huge profit, some a 'robost' Bank may jeopardise its capital in adventure of high risk business. And they may require to "quit" although being robust. We aspire to see Indian banks sound enough if not "robust".
By
ASOKE KUSARI, Domestic Private Banking-Executive/Manager, A large leading PSU Bank - India
| 01 14 2010 13:40:59 +0000
when we saw crisis last year all the sectors suffered. Real estate, commercial vehicles & construction equipment, consumer durables...all suffered. when economy does not get its fuel i.e. working capital it is difficult for everybody to sustain. The intensity of the crisis can be understood by the fact that for RBI had to come forward & allow banks to reschedule loans or else we would have been no different then American banks. Our banks survived because our system & culture are robust enough to cushion such hits & because of RBI's risk aversion policies.
By
shashank mishra, Bank
| 01 14 2010 11:50:05 +0000
|