ITS THEIR LEARNING AGE AND KIDS MUST KNOW FIRST ITS USAGE. ONCE THEY BECOME FAMILIAR TO THESE WORDS THEN THEY CAN USE WHILE CHATTING OR SENDING MESSAGE TO SOMONE.
ITS NOT A RIGHT AGE FOR FUN.
By
Sairam. M, System Administrator
| 05 24 2011 06:20:38 +0000
RELATIVELY SPEAKING ENGLISH IS THE EASIEST LANGUAGE OF ALL LANGUAGES. IN THE NAME OF EVOLUTION AND THE CHANGING SCENARIO WE HAVE BEEN PUSHED OR RATHER COMPELLED TO ACCEPT ANY CHANGES. BY AND LARGE IT IS ADAPTATION AND NOTHING SPECIAL.
By
sudhakar , BUSINESS CONSULTANT
| 03 15 2011 17:07:13 +0000
Frankly, I am the supporter of sticking to the language norms myself, and I hate to see any communication so made. But any language in general, and English in particular has to undergo a lot of changes in the process of evolution. What to say when the British kids are seen using the 'SMS and Internet lingo' in their routine communication? What's more even the British dictionaries have been continuously including these popular words in their newer versions.
By
PG , Top Management, INMANTEC
| 03 15 2011 10:06:42 +0000
Yes, absolutely.English is a beautiful language and like so many other things it too has suffered at the hands of the so called technologies that has invaded our lives.Gone are the days when grammer was part of our school and college curricula. Today even the teachers lack the knowledge of grammer and therefore given less importance in our schools and colleges. It is o.k to shorten some words like you with 'U' and so on to accommodate the number of words within the S.M.S. limits but to add such words as 'LOL' 'F....' and so on, are uncalled for.Such usage only brings in disrespect into the other side's mind.
By
Venkatraman , Sales Executive/Officer, Magnum Enterprises
| 03 15 2011 01:25:21 +0000
Its true and I support that this culture has already made an impact on kids who use more of IMs and SMS technology. They have a big difficulty in remembering spellings and right grammar.
By
Denis Thomas Varghese, Instructor, Air Force
| 03 14 2011 16:32:50 +0000
I think its not good for office chat and all professional stuff. I am also using these abbrevialtions but I do take care always. A smile :) is jsut OK if we use in professional life but if it is avaidable it should avoid. I agree with JYOTI, it is ruining our culture and basically against ethics.......
By
Ankit Goel, SSCS, AonHewitt Associates
| 03 14 2011 10:58:42 +0000
smileys and shortened versions of the phrases are LIFE of the CHAT apps on the net. These are the tools for conveying the message in short span of time and not for getting the Language ethics right. Since, the young children are in large number among the users of online CHAT apps, they are greatly exposed to such kind of terms and adapt them more quickly. Again the natural urge to share, use newly known things with others make the children use these terms more often. It eventually ruines their language ethics, unless parents, teachers or elderly persons strongly encourage them to stick to language ethics. There is a fear that with too much use of LOL, children (or anybody for that matter) would spell "laugh" as "Lough", some day in future ..
By
Amod Rajendra Pusalkar, Solution Developer, MCSD.Net
| 03 14 2011 10:32:35 +0000
A phrase in full has its own sweetness and depth. Consider using BTW, Rgds etc. while sending a professional letter. Next you should be sure that the recipient understands such abbreviated stuffs. To few COLLEGE can mean: C-Come, O-On, L-Lets, L-Love, E-Each, G-Girl, E-Equally .. and what not? Its fair to differentiate and use appropriately while for a SMS, an email or a generic format.
By
Arpit Biswas, Managing Consultant, EMCPL
| 03 14 2011 08:30:55 +0000
Slang including abbreviation are meant to show insiders that you belong to their group and to keep outsiders in the dark. If ethics is to see life as a compettion between something good and something else that is good, then this is not good ethics, simply because it ruins the possibility of entering a dialgoue across closed communities. Internally in the community abbreviations are meant to speed up the communication.
By
Kaj Voetmann, Senior Consultant, Beren
| 03 14 2011 06:25:08 +0000
|
haha...oops sorry, LOL...a gud d-bate...lang. do not get ruined if v start using abbs. to start communicating.However, 4 kids at schools, the rt. form of lang. must be tot (what was that?) so that dey getta hold of da lang. b4 dey begin to learn dis form of lang. vich i b-live tears the lang. ethics apart 4 fun but however keeps da basic foundation strng. Such type of lang. do not give a chance to ny1 to find errors in vat uve ritten...But, dats ver d fun lies and shud nt be taken as part of d real lang. vich has all brought us together. Lets not get FCUKD UP using dis lang coz it just adds spice 2 our communication...Phew! I think dat was enuf 4 2day. The ones marked in bold is just a snapshot of how the language has been torn apart for fun but its our responsibility to fix them together. I just fixed it. Have you?
By
Saibal Ray, Sr. Process Engineer, KPIT Cummins Infosystems
| 03 19 2011 08:35:24 +0000
Mahalakshmi is very much correct. It is no way harming the language at all as it is just derived from the English language. It is very difficult to type all the letters using your handphone,PC, Laptop,especially when you are in hurry. When it is an official matter,we generally don't use such shortcuts though.
By
Dhawal , IT Consultant, Electro Industries
| 03 15 2011 12:31:26 +0000
|