I suppose most of the managers and supervisors are fearful to receive negative feedback from employees, the reasons are as follows;
If more employees leaves the organization that really reflects in retention rate. If the retention rate is not as per the management expectation the respective managers are responsible to answer which in turn reflects his/her capabilities.
In most of the cases supervisors tries to protect their seats in form of pulling down of his own team legs who are equally competitive and can show better results than him. Thats why supervisor tries to be so close with his/her reporting manager and does everything thing what his/her reporting manager says without judging the pros & cons.
If more employees leaves the organization that really reflects in retention rate. If the retention rate is not as per the management expectation the respective managers are responsible to answer which in turn reflects his/her capabilities.
In most of the cases supervisors tries to protect their seats in form of pulling down of his own team legs who are equally competitive and can show better results than him. Thats why supervisor tries to be so close with his/her reporting manager and does everything thing what his/her reporting manager says without judging the pros & cons.
Thats why managers and supervisors generally prefer to go for peer appraisal.
I don't think so. If the managers or supervisors are good why to worry of negetive comments possibly from a man who could not perform. A good manager must be ready to face negetive comments. It will rectify if there is short coming in the functioning of the manager. Mindless negetive comment willnot do any harm at all.
Hi Ramya I agree with you, even I have seen people who are very fearful when his/her team member quit the job. Because nowadays most of the companies have a exit interview when an employee is leaving the company at that time he will be asked to give a feedback of his /her superior, it they receive a negative feedback that will be considered as a black mark for him. So it is obvious that every superior/manager will have fear when his team member is exiting the job.
I am not sure it is a "fear" factor, as much as apathy. Some decide an individual is leaving so any negative remarks are merely dismissed; after all the individual is leaving. While some would abuse this process, there is something to be learned in exit remarks but, I rarely see or hear of them.
I rarely have had meetings on negative reviews, only postings on positive.
There is one assumption; there is an exit interview and it is discussed. In the majority of discussions I have had with hr individuals, this practice has either stopped or is a private conversation with hr and goes in the individuals file and is immediately inaccessible. You do not fear what no one will read, discuss, analyze. Some of this, in my opinion, is due to modern management not having to take courses in employee development and being evaluated on meeting production and/or financial goals and not people skills.
I agree that most manager and supervisors are concerned about feedback within employee exit interviews. However, this is the fault of the organization. The company should look at feedback as a gift and they should include their managers and sups in that type of culture. I encourage feedback from the people that work for me. It gives me a chance to improve myself professionally.
Mr. Prashanth Kantheti is right. More people leaving an organisation will indeed create a bad image of the organisation for which respective managers has to answer putting a question mark on his capability of managing tasks and supervisors, just to become a "sweet fruit" in the eyes of his concerned manager, becomes "too close" to him and does all the buttering just to keep him pleased. This is the reason managers and supervisors generally prefer to go for peer appraisal.
Most supervisors are not afraid of a negative feedback and should not be afraid as long as they have delivered their duties diligently. Some surveys have shown that employees do not leave organizations but managers, even if this holds good, the supervisor should not be afraid.The supervisor need not be afraid if he/she is confident that they have not victimized the team member. May be finer points that come out of a exit interview gives a chance for the supervisor to improve. Nobody is a perfect leader, history has never seen one.
Every employee (of any cadre in anorganization) will behave the way he is being measured. So probabaly there is a problem the organization functions which has led to the team member quitting. The supervisor needs to be scared only if there is trend or a sudden spurt in team members quitting the team, due to personal issues with supervisor and not for professional issues.
Exit interviews are used to get feedback from those who leave. Maybe as they are leaving once for, sometimes they may express some views, which they would not do when they continue. Whatever it is, a feedback is only a feedback. It has value once as a source of information and as the view of a particular person.
Why should manageers bed afraid of frank remarks? If they are good it is fine; if not they have to take it as a chance for self-evaluation and decided if those remarks should be ignored or acted upon. There is no reason to be afraid of them.
Mr.Acharya is right. If the manager is right, then it is not his fault if the employee is under performing. So he need not worry. A good manager should not bother negative feedback from any non-performer...
I suppose most of the managers and supervisors are fearful to receive negative feedback from employees, the reasons are as follows; If more employees leaves the organization that really reflects in retention rate. If the retention rate is not as...
Its extremely important to conduct an exit interview when an employee leaves the organization. Employee exit interviews are an important part of HR management and monitoring employee retention and satisfaction. Just as it is important to hold a sales...