yes, it is possible for organisations and leaders to promote worklife balance.
one CEO is known for entering the gate and leaving the gate exactly in time with watch work precision leading by example not expecting people to unnecessarily put up late hours which was seen as inefficiency by the organisation. he was instrumental in turning around the company and raising productivity - this was way back in the seventies.
one professional executive director starts his meetings and finishes them just in time. meets managers once a week only and does not disturb them for the whole week even on the telephone. his table is clear and clears the mail fast and effectively. is a well trained professional manager full of grace and worth emulating individual.
thus leading by example allowing people to manage their time and performance effectively is possible, rather than have training programmes preaching time management or stress management having created the stress already - better have work systems and work culture which prevents stress and treats people with dignity and professionally delegating work with the needed support systems. worklife balance depends more on the leadership and the organisational culture,
while the individual could emulate the system imbibing the right time management practices working smartly and productively rather than find oneself in a mess all the time and overworking killing the day achieving practically nothing being summoned by the seniors now and then with adhoc queries and urgent requirements - making life a drudgery for people calling them on holidays too. and then people are expected to be in time in the morning followed with penalties adding to the irritation - atleast be flexible on this.
workload too needs to be only that much which an effective individual can take during the standard day, could have additional manpower or better technology and work procedures. why aim at organisational targets which do not match the organisational resources with stress for all - in case unavoidable can organisations be atleast humane and compensatory for the hardwork in terms of overtime policies, free meals/tea/coffee etc, drop facility late evenings or on holidays. reward systems which factor the hardwork of the employees all the year round. many companies are sensitive enough but many are not.
one chemical company which commissioned the project and got it inaugurated by the late president RVenakataraman invited only the officers for the evening inauguration dinner. while the technicians cadre qualified science graduates and diploma engineers who slogged 12-16 hours literally each day throughout the year during the project period were ignored totally. they were angered and forced themselves into the pandal and started having the food kept ready for the officers.
one company cut telephone lines for company executives and stopped the unlimited tea/coffee facility once it was decided that the office headquarters are shifting and many had already moved - may be the inconvenience was unintended but why such silly measures hurting people in terms of the demonstrated company attitude seeming selfish lacking refinement in approach, rather than respecting the people who could continue for a while till the shifting is over, causing emotional distress in helplessness.
hope the above case examples exemplify the message of how worklife balance is possible or can be disturbed both physically and emotionally.
individual worklife balance depends on the organisational work culture, while it could be possible to have a world class TQM culture these days through quality and hrd awareness and policies.
regards/kshantaram