Blocking

Veena you are right (in my opinion).

We need to be treated with respect, but respect isn't to listen (or to give right to spoke) only to people thinking or behaving exactly like we do.

Other issue is the use of some tool/ instrument in a not proper way: you can use a knife to cut your bread or...in another way. I suppose nobody is thinking, for this reason, to avoid to sell the knife, or to make more complex to buy a knife and so on. Tipically a law is put in place simply to condamn individual not proper use of a knife...

THANK YOU ARIHANT.

BLOCKING IS NOT REQUIRED FOR US AS THE PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET SAVVY PEOPLE GOING THRO ALL THESE NETWORKS IS SMALL AND IT IS THE EDUCATED LOT WHO CAN ANALYSE THE PROS AND CONS AND TAKE RIGHT DECISIONS.

I agree Veena. Blocking is not a solution to this problem,

not required at the end of the day how many people really have time for such crap

blocking is not necessary since most people have no time for such sites, and those who do go to such sites are not worth attention.

Banning a site can't block flow of information - this age of communication has too many options to render blocking ineffective. Blocking sites and censoring media are usually resorted to by authoritarian regimes, But people who want to, do get around that. And in the process of censorship many uninvolved people are deprived.

I think instead of blocking group forming new groups which respect India and which accuses groups is more effective

INDIANS ARE PATRIOTIC WONT MATTER TO THEM ANY BODY HERE IN INDIA KNOWS THE TRUE FACT,PAKISTAN BANS EVERYTHING ANYBODY WHO SPEAK AGAINST THEM EXCEPT HAVE NOT BANNED THEMSELVES AND TERRIORISTS

After facebook, pakistan blocks youtube because of its "growing sacrilegious contents"(a group announced an competition for cartoons of Prophet Mohammed). Do you think that even India should do the same(there are so many groups against India)?