Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
Posted in Community :

HR Professionals

 
Created by : Darshana Sawant, HR Manager, Leading IT services company  | 12 10 2009 06:49:49 +0000
Industry : Human Resources (HR) ConsultingFunctional Area : Organizational Development(People Management)
Activity:  763 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

While many corporate offices are yet to bar the use of mobile phones with cameras within office premises, they have started filtering mails being sent by employees to avoid transfer of key data or information to the enemy camp, and in a way they have started checking the personal email accounts of their employees.

And use of IT facilities including email is governed by the Employees Code of Conduct. Since our emails are archived, mails can be accessed and reviewed post facto by the user’s manager in case there is a need to do so.

So people, should corporates filter staff mails? What are your views on this.

 
 Refer 353
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes Vs No
47
 
 
 
 
21
27
16
Support   Support
Top Argument
11
2

I think companies have a responsibility to maintain discrete of their current work or project details from their competitors, though  at time intentionally or unintentionally information will be leaked and companies lost out because these processes were either transferred surreptitiously to the enemy camp and subsequently used the processes to execute other similar type of projects. So yes companies should check the email accounts of their employees, though there might be several other mediums how a info could be leaked but then by keeping a tab on the email accounts of employees the damage somewhat will be of lesser extent.


By Darshana Sawant, HR Manager, Leading IT services company  12 10 2009 06:55:02 +0000
 
Top Argument
3
0

I slightly differ from the views in support of filtering mails for the following reasons:

While the Company reserves it's rights to protect sensitive data from its Competitors, it can do so for people who handle the critical data, with prior consent as a policy when signing the agreement contract.  For the rest of the employees, I feel it would impringe on their human rights of honesty and integrity.


By Niloufer N. Tarapore, HR Executive, Suzlon Energy Limited  12 10 2009 14:26:18 +0000
0
0

Defintely yes, personal life is restricted in office and must be away from one's office.This would increase the professionalism within an employee.


By KUMAR SAURABH JHA, HR Manager  | 02 10 2010 06:33:56 +0000
1
0

I completely agree that we should filter staff mails & monitor them. People are so under-educated about what the risks are of using a publicly accessible e-mail account. They think that when they send an e-mail from their account that e-mail is perfectly secure, that no one else can look at it. That's just wrong. It's easy for an employee to attach a confidential file to an outgoing e-mail message. Whether it's by mistake or on purpose, the outcome of the loss of confidential data is the same. Borland International experienced this first-hand. A Borland employee used the company's e-mail system to send out confidential information to competitor Symantec, his prospective employer. The trade secrets included product design specifications, sales data, and information regarding a prospective contract for which both companies were competing. The employee and recipient were both charged with trade secret theft. It's easy to send e-mail without thinking about the content and its consequences. Yet, corporate e-mail is a business tool that can have the same legal weight as a letter written on company letterhead. Unlike printed letters, once the Send key is hit, there's way to recover the message. No matter how amusing some employees may find jokes, others may be offended. But also only by making policy, these things cannot be controlled, there should be a monitoring team consisting of HRD, IT, Legal, Top management, who monitor time to time these things, should make aware to all the employees.


By Ameet Ranjan, Regional HR - North India, Maclellan Integrated Services India Pvt Ltd  | 01 12 2010 07:41:12 +0000
1
0

This calls for debate as it is matter of both how much professional ethics employees demonstrate as well as how much privacy should a person be allowed to maintain. It is as good as allowing government to tap personal phones without personal consent as it is more important to take into account national security compared to individual. The same goes for company's confidential information. Although confidential information can be compromised in many different ways than what an individual can imagine, filtering mails can be one way for company's security dept to analyse information.


By Vinay Udekar, Advisory Systems Analyst, IBM  | 12 20 2009 17:54:42 +0000
1
0

I am agree on that the corporates should filter staff mails, because is a way to avoid that critical and confidential information is transfered to the competition. But I think this is only a containment. Corporates should also identify the possible causes for the lack of loyalty from they employees and implement the appropiate actions to eliminate or at least reduce those causes. I would suggest that corporates should evaluate the profile of the employees that will be assigned to roles where critical and confidential information is managed and determine if they are really accountable and if their level of loyalty is the one required for the position.


By Pedro Gonzalez Lopez, Advance Quality Engineer, Alps Electric  | 12 13 2009 03:28:16 +0000
1
0

office is a place of work. there is no need to stay if there is no work in the office. you should not be paid for gibberish things like staff mails to do!!!


By GORACHAND BARMAN, chemical engineer, INDIAN OIL  | 12 13 2009 00:59:52 +0000
1
0

Certainly yes.  The very knowledge that the employees are being watched will ensure that no misadventures are tried in place of work.  This will act as a deterrent against personal mails, also put a check into any kind  abuse, data theft etc.,

I don't mean that these don't happen under monitored environments, but acts as a general deterrent.

It also helps monitor quality of client correspondences happening, and can give the an early warning in case any project or client is dissatisfied and helps in setting things right before things have gone bad.


By Rijo Stephen Cletus, Business Analyst / Consultant for IT, Hospitals and Healthcare Sector  | 12 12 2009 02:16:20 +0000
2
0

In today's rat race there are no permanent employees in any org .Hence there is little latitude for loyalty that was present in earlier days. This is more so in IT and its obvious that IT org structure changes very fast with the bottom line effects and many are hired or either fired.

In this scenario the CEO is already high tensioned with his business objectives and in the present day with too many scams or piracy and secrecy being exploited by various companies in a innovative way, there are people who either fall prey to these poachers  or willingly like to earn faster by selling information.

The secrecy of the IT services and products documents can be sent through many innovative ways other than mails. Hence mails could be one of the careers of these loss of company security aspects which cannot be compromised.

To respect the company personnel and their privacy and dignity of life and also to not doubt their integrity at the cost of few black sheep , its not advisable to screen the personal mails.This would reduce the people morale and reduce effective of work for those people who really work as per company's norms.

Hence with due respect to employees and their freedom of their privacy the following is apt.

The work area where official work is done should  not be a place where the mail access should  be given  to any one(irrespective of positions)

The mail facility/browsing can be organised in a public place with computer terminals where any one can access their mails  or keep their personal integrity of their private mails. This facility has to be provided because mostly all software personnel work late hours and more so they are addict to many modern facilities like banking, personal utilization of various service providers, where they perforce should have the facility to function during their lean period during work.

Well in any case i don't agree with mixing up these both issues of personal and official from the same desktop at the cost of company's security .

Hence the monitoring of mails in the present day are provided with various software that is measure to ensure that strict security is being followed and these days it becomes a clients requirement too. clients are comfortable only with company s who have foolproof security processes and security measures in every aspects. Mails are a danger to these aspects of IT-business.

the company is meant for official work and not for personal work . however allowing them to use the official desk for Private mails and having a system of monitoring their mail leaves a dent on integrity of many who are sincere too.

Hence the IT infrastructure should be planned for bothe the issues without affecting the employees freedom of privacy which is a morale booster. The employees freedom of privacy  should be respected by all owners and mangement of the company's

Regards

Major M Rajendran


By Rajendran Mariagnanam Mariagnanam, Founder and managing partner, Braintrain consultancy services LLP  | 12 11 2009 15:47:28 +0000
1
0

dear darshana

its indeed a matter of concern not only for the management but also for the employees being two face of a single coin as complementing each other.management expects employees to be loyal,dedicated,sincere with undoubted integrity to attain desired goals with a sense of belonging among the employees.however it has been witnessed on many occasions that employees faltered just to satisfy their  own goals. here i must say that its only few % of people who get swayed by the lucrative short term gain. i feel that if you are hired by any organisation for a specific task and being compensated accordingly, you may like to give your best shot.

in a team work a single guy falters, the entire team must be liable for the same....then only the team spirit gets intact.

i support the argument

 


By jitendra kumar, management of logistics resources at middle level, indian army  | 12 11 2009 08:15:58 +0000
1
0

There is no other way bcoz company's interests are of paramount importance.An oppurtunity is provided to show our ability.We earn and if earn then we can have our own resources and time to utilize them for our interests.When we are hired then it is company that comes first else we are kings in our own way.

It also reflects the moral duty of the employee about his/her conduct.


By Manish Grover, Account Manager , Impressico Business Solutions Pvt Ltd  | 12 11 2009 04:57:06 +0000
1
0

Of course definitely they have to filter the staff mails for the security reason.

I suggest the staff to don’t use the official id for there personal msgs.My frnd aparna, I believe my staff on there capabilities but not on there feature growth. For a moment assume that I believe them, then why they will leave the job after getting the good opportunity.


By Mohammed Abdul Bari, Network Support Engineer@ETISALAT, Dubai  | 12 10 2009 20:47:57 +0000
1
0

In the world of Intelllectual capital and Service Sector, i think the corporates must have an eye on their employees, this is not only for mails sent by them but also for other activities like thier telephonic talks, thier association with other concerns etc., the employees are nowadays fell prey to competitors and there are also incidents where there is a large quantity of data is transferred to competitors.

 As of my experience i have seen companies who use advanced type of systems but never have an USB drive or an CD writable drive (they use networks to transfer Data which is Monitored) and a leading MNC bank scrutinizes all incoming and outgoing mails of their employees and even they block email attachments and get permission from the concerned epersons to deliver that mail.

So the employers can act as a watchdog of their employees but there must be some thresholds of their monitoring and the employees must gain trust in their boss or else there is a chance of opening their (employees) Re`sumes for switching to other companies.


By ayyappha mani, LLB(lawyer), M.B.A Student- ANNA UNIVERSITY, COIMBATORE  | 12 10 2009 16:36:06 +0000
1
0

Yes i agree with the conclusion filltering the mails of the employees in the organisation.But some times employes became some sterotype in the organisation were they use to send junk mails.


By ramesh kumar bhagat, Operations  | 12 10 2009 15:40:08 +0000
1
0

Employees are paid to perform the job they are hired for. Yes, they do need recreation, but can that be at the cost of the employer? Definitely not. Freedom does not imply wasting time, passing on copies of processes and procedures to various group and friends. Where is the issue if an employer wants to protect its intellectual property?

Yes, filters are definitely acceptable.


By Ajay Chaudhari, Chief Executive Officer, Adroit Consultants  | 12 10 2009 15:10:45 +0000
1
0

Yes, companies should keep the track of mails sent out from the personnel account. I feel this has to be done keeping things in mind : the compliance are being followed or not, culture of the organization not being hampered, and many others. This not only keeps the employees from doing something wrong intentionally or unintentionally but also discourages the employees from using those sites which are prohibited. The hidden camera's and filter mails make a huge difference in employee culture for any organization. ...... Thank you, Manish N.

Cheers!!


By Manish N Chugh, Officer Trainee, Stock Holding Corporation of India ltd.,  | 12 10 2009 15:08:36 +0000
1
0

In my opinion companies have to protect them selves from their competitors by one of the means is monitor staff's mails.This should not surprise few because fighting enemy inside or outside is all same.Our defence force select their men from common civilian pool and our corporates select their men & women  from common civilian pool.But the difference is, in defence selected candidates are altered to their(defence) needs and their mails are subjected to scrutiny as and when required, we all know the existing best dicipline in defence.But in corporates dicipline exists to a lesser extent than defence, hence registance may be seen when corporates filter staff mails,which should be ignored in the interest of organisation.


By c.s.manjunthan , BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER., ENTREPRENEUR & SENIOR TRAINER  | 12 10 2009 13:46:32 +0000
1
0

i shoud be you are right


By RAKESH PARMAR, Accounts Executive/Accountant, Government Of Gujarat  | 12 10 2009 12:45:32 +0000
1
0

Every company having unique ways and ideas of business management and there by it is imperative that they maintain confidentiality in all operations. Everyone in the staff may not be straight forward and there will be someone with vested interest. They may try to encash by sending the informations out. It could also be an accidental error for leakage of informations. There by I feel it is right to upport you


By Sunil R Kumar, Vice President (Contracts ), Mfar Constructions  | 12 10 2009 12:43:47 +0000
1
0

Good Darshana, very valid argument, i support the argument because the management is having full right to filter not only the e-mails but all the correspondences, personal belongings of its staff for better security measures and as safety precautions to avoid leakage of integral data or anything which advocates the integrity and USP of the organisation.


By Dr. S.Pruthviraja pande, Visiting Professor, Bangalore/Ravenshaw University  | 12 10 2009 12:34:14 +0000
1
0

Yes ..this shouldn't have any problem as all the IT infrastructure is provided by company for achieving compnay goals....no issues for companies to have transperency in the system...this will increase the faith.....defaulters will in anycase find their ways out....:)


By Shakti Singh Chauhan, Head of Facilities - Reliance Retails  | 12 10 2009 11:29:48 +0000
1
0

The argument has to be analysed & reviewed w.r.t. its relevancy & importance for a particular business entity. It can not be cotnsidered as a generalized rule for one & all. 

For a Business enitity where its business model itself is based on assimilation, compilation, analysis, strategizing & finally successful monetization of data in its different form, the organisation has every right & it must opt for monitoring & filtering of employee's external communications whether it is in the forms of e-mail, sms, mms or physical communications. If the business entity neglects this, then it is inviting trouble for itself & exposing to such kind of external risk which will ultimately make its business model unsustainable. In such case, individual employee's privacy related arguments are to be suppressed by suitable HR/ADM policy doctrine.   

However, if a business entity needs creative use of external communications undertaken by its employees for sustaining & expanding the business ops, then you have to let them go & have a free use of medium of external communications. This is because creativity can not be harnessed in a close & restrictive environment.

So, It will be important for a organisation like WIPRO to opt for close monitoring of employee's e-mails.

RDG 


By RD Gupta, Sourcing, Procurement, Vendor Development, Exim, Supply Chain Management  | 12 10 2009 10:55:59 +0000
2
0

A very valid question is being asked here and I feel that many a staff feels that it is an infringement of their rights,However lets look at this issue impartially.

Staff should be using their corporate email id's purely for work.

Any personal mails should be from their personal email account,many companies set filters which deny access to webmail sites like yahoo & rediffmail for the simple reason that

1.They don't want external viruses clogging their servers

2.They have total control of what goes in and out from staff email accounts.This rule also forms a part of staff code of conduct and in many cases is part of the staff code of conduct.

 

This policy of what should be allowed and disallowed has to be looked at time and again by the management based on traffic statistics,which are available from the IT department.

 

 

 

 


By Percy Doctor, Management Consultant  | 12 10 2009 09:35:34 +0000
1
0

Hi:

They have to filter mails so that corporates can ensure about the data security.In many companies data is the key asset so if companies filter it would be fine and it is more of a precautionary measure.It would be more professional as well.

 

Thanks and Regards,

Priya R


By Priya Rajan, HR Executive, Klintelligen Healthcare India Pvt ltd  | 12 10 2009 08:36:55 +0000
1
0

More over if valuable resources get mails for their career opportunity in their companies mails, as they don't get much time to access their personal mail ids, this can stop the company from losing their candidates, they can stop the mail at the entry level and retain the employees.


By Aparna Hareesh, Assistant Manager, Emploi Globale Consulting Pvt. Ltd  | 12 10 2009 08:19:12 +0000
0
0

Yes,

I support for this, because many of the times, people are just sending personal mails, and we cannot access important mails on in case of any urgent basis. and our IT people give the reason i.e server down. But why it happend every time though we are having constant check.

 So many times this case is happened with me only and i am totally helpless that time

 

 

 


By Namrata C Ramnath, HR Executive, Gala Precision Engineering Private Limited  | 12 10 2009 08:15:21 +0000
1
0

Should corporates check employee's mails or not? Darshana good topic to discuss on!

Any information that could potentially harm the corporates reputation, spoil customer delight - through hacking of customer accounts etc. need to be monitored and checked on. Corporates should check mails in that case.

If its an environment where employees deal with Customer's Account related details, then i feel employees shouldn't be able to access their mails. 

In today's world there is so munch of competition, competitors get to great extent of securing information about their competition through any way. It's better to check internally first and then go to external world.

Employees shouldn't access their mails during office hours if they feel it is personal and it shouldn't be monitored.

 

Thanks,

Srinivas

 


By Srinivas D, Sales/BD Manager, CareerNet Technologies Pvt. Ltd.  | 12 10 2009 08:15:13 +0000
2
0

Hi Darshana,

A very valid point that you have raised. I just cant wait to write or discuss on this.

I feel the technology is now so advance that tracking of the emails can be done which will help the organizations in also knowing about any personal emails been sent from that specific emailid. However there are other sources of leaking the company information. So we need to keep a track of all the latest technological developments which is happening around us.


By vanita Srinivasan Iyer, Proprietor, HeadStart Inc  | 12 10 2009 07:55:27 +0000
0
0

I agree. It should be made discretionary and there should be a basis for looking into the mails. Else, it is an out and out way of saying 'I don't trust you'. We then expect the people working to be engaged?


By Mona Jain, Senior Consultant, Infosys  | 01 09 2010 01:37:01 +0000
1
0

when more safe methods of passing out confidential information are available for a person who deliberately intends to do it, then why screening e-mails only? It wld have a bearing on the morale of dedicated Staff and their level of loyalty towards the Organisation. Well, a check mechanism can be thought of to trace the communication in the event of a breach being reported and by making the employees binding on enforceable Confidentiality rules, you can keep the activities on check.


By Resmi Maxim, GENERAL MANAGER - OPERATIONS, SI PROPERTY (KERALA) PVT.LTD.,  | 12 15 2009 09:08:51 +0000
1
0

They shouldn't! Primarily, human relationship is the basis of the whole human resource management. I personally feel that a person is not guilty unless otherwise proven. If we are putting checks on their communication systems as a precaution, then we are clearly doubting their intents. Can any relationship sustain on doubts? I, at least, don't think so. There are many ways how the data can be pilfered and there are many better ways how it can be protected. If I ever have to favor this, I would do this on a case basis as part of the judgmental process, and never as a general policy.


By PG , Top Management, INMANTEC  | 12 14 2009 18:57:58 +0000
1
0

Human resourcing is all about people and it is the people who make the organization,I strongly diagree with cesoring of employee mail,unless there is  a strong reason pointing for doing so.Let us ensure we retain our basic faith in the human resources at the same time let us also ensure that few disgruntle employee don't take advantage of it.So let us ensure the HR function remains effective and at the same time ensure employee integrity across the organization. Let us see we don't end up as corporate policing force. 


By KR BALA, Providing HR Services, Independent HR Consultant  | 12 13 2009 13:31:47 +0000
1
0

"breach of trust" between employee and organisation"...i agree with Alok, it is not only the mail which can be used to share the information, so the companies will have to check the employees, papers, mobile phones, pendrives, hard disks (other USB's) and laptop every evening which is practically not possible.


By Mohan Murari, Marketing Manager, Confidential  | 12 11 2009 19:17:26 +0000
1
0

Email is not the only medium used by the Offenders for leaking valuable data/info. There are other media too such as hard & soft copy/pendrive/brainy chap's powerful memory etc, so subjecting employees to military style of Scrutiny is least warranted specially so in today's " Equal Employment Opportunity" slogan. The best way out is to track and crack down on Offenders through Business Intelligence Technique other than 'Filttering".


By Girish Shivakumaran Nair, supervisory, Indian Air Force  | 12 11 2009 11:15:04 +0000
1
0

I do not think it is way org. can minimize the leakage. Leakage generally started from a certain level. So looking inside mail will be not the good option, infact it create "breach of trust" between employee and organisation. Certain Level employee have given Laptop by their org.  & those emplyee have access network from home too. So, they can do far easily as compare to spend money to system and staff to look at personal email. Infact, paper documents is one of another way employee can easily pass out the crucial information to any one.


By Alok Saxena, Designer cum Team Leader -(Technical), ATOS ORIGIN (PRINCE2 2009)  | 12 11 2009 03:47:08 +0000
1
0

No.

It is like creating a rule for exceptions. You can't subject most of your employees, who are ordinary, decent folks presumably [if not, then you need to look at the recruitment process first], to surveillance just because a few people may leak information. It is like observing everyone because some people may commit crime.

Also, there are other practical problems:

(a) It is ineffective, because those intent on serious damage will always use methods more secret than email.

(b) The environment of distrust will hurt the company and good people in the company will feel insulted.

(c) The cost and effort will be substantial considering that a number of people work from home and at client sites.

(d) Not sure how legally usable any information obtained through this, and may run into troubles with data protection, privacy and discrimination legislation. [What to do if you detect a sexually harrassing mail being sent to a female colleague by a male supervisor, and issues like that].


By Supriyo Chaudhuri, Chief Academic Officer, London School of Accountancy & Management  | 12 10 2009 21:39:56 +0000
2
0
  • Email is not the only way to leak the confidential details, since any company can loose their project through verbal leakage of confidential details
  • This will affect the work culture, So the company will loose the qualified people

By Ar.R.Raammnath , Project Architect, Shri Marudham Associates  | 12 10 2009 18:15:05 +0000
1
0

While I have said no, I actually think it depends on the culture that one wants to create. If the culture is one of trust and where individuals feel a sense of responsibility for the goodwill of the company, then there should be no screening of the emails. The downside is that no matter how well this culture is built there can still be a one odd person who misuses the trust. But that is the price one has to pay for building a larger culture of trust since the benefits of that far outweigh the losses.

However, if the culture is one of  mistrust then policing becomes extremely important and then screening emails is appropriate. It is a choice that organizations end up exercising either by design or by default. There is no in-between house on this.

Quite separately, in today's world if competition (called enemy in the topic) wants to know about the organization there are several sources available more than the employees of the organization.

So, overall, I would opt for creating a culture of trust and not screening emails.


By Pankaj Bhargava, Partner/Principal/VP, People Builders  | 12 10 2009 16:50:27 +0000
1
0

Email filtering without the expressed knowledge & consent of employees, e.g., as part of their employment contract, is a highly risky initiative.  Some of the reasons for not implementing such an unstated policy, are as follows:

1.  Infringes on the ethical rights of the employees

2.  Breaks the 'psychological contract' between employees and their employers

3.  Promotes 'Theory X' mentality within the organization and encourages innovative transgressions

4.  Difficult to define 'filtering' standards and prone to misuse for settling scores due to office politics

5.  Raises the question of 'monitoring' the 'monitor', i.e., check and balance issues

6.  May not be balanced in its approach, e.g., focused on the middle management and lower levels, whereas, senior management stays 'untouchable'

7.  Takes away a relaxing medium from employees who use it for 'blowing steam' to avoid burnout

Cheers:)


By Murad Salman Mirza, Freelancer, Freelancer  | 12 10 2009 12:56:36 +0000
1
0

I believe in transparency,Honesty and Trust.I'd rather be cheated than outsmarted.It is better to trust employees and instill a sense of responsibility than police or block mails.The more restrictions you put guys will find ways to beat the system.For a few guys who may cheat,is it good to mistrust all the employees?


By Mohan , Director, Spatik Consultants P.Ltd  | 12 10 2009 11:58:29 +0000
1
0

In my opinion in todays competetive business environment its not wise to spend energy in safeguarding the present business secrets. It will be more appropriate to use your energy in innovating new ways of doing business and be the path finder. In todays world what we call it secret will never be a secret tommorow and unless we keep on innovating new ways we will no more be the leader in the business.

Corporate must respect employee privecy and refrain from filtering the staff mails. It is noticed that Very few nos of employees are engaged in sending out business secrets to competitors which one cannot prevent fully. If it is so desired appropriate technology to be put in place to prevent such unauthorised shairing.


By Dilep Misra, Sr. VP & Head HR  | 12 10 2009 08:56:10 +0000
2
0

No, i think tey dont hav the rite to check peoples mail, first of all highly confidential info are to be limited to those who matter, and if you dont have trust in the people who work for you, its high time you cnsidered your work ethics. Furthermore snooping is an invasion of privacy. 


By Aparna Bipin Balakrishnan, Coodinator, Community Leadership Development Programme, Basic Needs India  | 12 10 2009 07:25:22 +0000
Leading recruitment Firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
You can easily see more number of working moms in coming days as most of the corporate...
 
137 referals 9 comments, 773 views
Now a days everyone gives importance to corporate culture. Many companies create a different...
 
417 referals 26 arguments, 2024 views
Green HR  is one which involves two essential elements: environmentally friendly HR practices...
 
121 referals 8 votes, 7991 views
more...  
 
More From Author
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I see. There are few innovative ads but rest all are stale. I do not understand many of these ads, their purpose looks so unclear that I feel that...
Definitely when we can pay 300 rs for a movie 150 for pop corn and pepsi who are we to fight for few rs hike in railway fare. We all know that prices for everything including most crucially petrol, LPG and day to day domestic supplies is increasing...
Fiscal deficit * Fiscal deficit seen at 5.9 percent of GDP in 2011-12 * Fiscal deficit seen at 5.1 percent of GDP in 2012-13 Revenue and Taxes * Personal income tax exemption limit raised to Rs 200,000. Those in the Rs 2 lakh-Rs 5 lakh bracket...
more...