Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 1 of 2 in Topic  Next >>
Posted in Community :

Business and Law

 
Created by : Rajesh Tekale, Counsel, Advocate on Record , High Court, Mumbai  | 08 01 2011 07:31:46 +0000
Industry : LawFunctional Area : Productivity & Performance(Strategy & Execution)
Activity:  114 views;  last activity : 08 01 2011 09:35:23 +0000

No confession made by any person whilst he is in the custody of a Police Officer, Unless it be made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, shall be proved as against such person."

 
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Statement should be accepted as Evidence Vs The statement of accused, have no evidential value
0
 
 
 
 
5
0
4
Support   Support
 
0
0
Statement without circumstantial evidence has no value. Suspects have to be appraised of the background of circumstances leading to his arrest etc. "Miranda" standards (Miranda Vs Arizona case of USA) to follow. Any confession in violation of these "Miranda" standards are null and void.
By Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.  | 08 01 2011 09:35:23 +0000
0
0
In a solitary confinement, a third-degree torture as a tool made available to the police offers to record a statement is not tenable unless and until its proved otherwise before the Magistrate or Judge. This is only the safeguard available to the common people, otherwise, the jails will be filled with the innocents who have no wherewithal to fight their case!
By S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner  | 08 01 2011 09:02:52 +0000
0
0
It is good provision to safeguard the people. Police are using third degree methods to get a confessional statement, knowing fully well that it is not maintanable.
By MS_Pi , Top Management, Confidential  | 08 01 2011 07:49:42 +0000
0
0

Articles 20 (2) of the constitution have provided for the safeguards since the basic jurisprudence in Indian criminal law says that an accused is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty and the onus lies exclusively on the prosecution to prove the guilt."

Section 27 of Evidence Act. Provided that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence in the custody of a Police Officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved."


By Rajesh Tekale, Counsel, Advocate on Record , High Court, Mumbai  | 08 01 2011 07:31:46 +0000
IT Service and Staffing company
High Availbility, Patches, Disaster Recovery, Hyperion Admin, Arowana Consulting
Oracle Apps, HRMS, Oracle Apps HRMS Consultant, Arowana Consulting
Jobs -Oracle Apps, DBA, Apps DBA, Arowana Consulting
Viewers also viewed
The country has been outraged by Moral policing, and we all know the Ram sene fiasco that...
 
437 referals 18 arguments, 2370 views
Income tax : First they said anyone who has annual income upto 5 lacs will not have to file IT...
 
1910 referals 17 arguments, 483 views
A young woman was picked up in a car outside a night club and raped at gunpoint by five men as...
 
141 referals 8 comments, 128 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (2)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 195 views
Nirmal Baba is a fraud vs Nirmal Baba is a Saint
 
513 referals 10 arguments, 131 views
more...  
More From Author
No politician or senior officer ever goes to jail despite huge evidence  because Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) and CBI directly come under the government. Before starting investigation or initiating prosecution in any case, they have to take...
Thanks for referral in addition to what is stated by MS_Pi i like to add some more details.   1.whether hindu, muslim will depend upon the applicable act. 2.provisions under the partnership deed are relevant. 3.Article of association is relevant.
Ishwar alla tere nam sabko sanmati de bhagwan.
more...