cricket vs football: which is more interesting

I enjoy football.. the excitement in Football is totally different. its also involves higher level of skill and stamina - 90minutes, ....... of high energy ...............

Kindly look into the local or club foot ball.  But no one is likes Ranji and local cricket.

Match fixing is nothing but T20.  It fools us by dancing dolls, etc. 

Though Shilpa I agree with you but the world watch Football in India only a limited few watch Football. Football any day a much fast game as compared to cricket.

yes

I too love foot-ball which is very interesting game that is not getting due importance. I think this is due to the money involved where as the cricket has much more importance in India on account of money power plays the role.

Thanks Ms.Shilpa for the referral.

Whether every Indian agree or disagree, but Football is more interesting game than cricket.

I had the same feeling when i compared the football and the one day international . But now it is different both are interesting for the every single minute . Change can take place at any point of game as you can see how Ireland changed vs England. So my opinion is both are equally entertaining .

Well, Football is a fast game and takes some stamina for running the whole 90 minutes or 120 minutes at times.The players are very fit and take the challenge of running through defenses every single offense move is forwarded.There are 11 players on field per team totals of 22 players just like cricket but the irony is in cricket only 2 people in batting stay on field but 11 stay on fielding.This shows cricket is a lazy game. There may be times when a player in a team does nothing at all and gets money paid on time as their match fees.Football is not like that every person has to earn their salary if they play good they get paid more else they get paid less. Cricket is good game to watch and get ourselves entertainment as we Indians like cricket better than football.