Does Indian Constitution Really Guarantee Equality & Socialism

Thanks for your response, Dhingra Sir.

& thanks for your views for this debate & past debates, from which I got useful

information.

Keep posting, Sir.

Dar Shrikant,

Your observation is very correct.

A simple answer is..... No.

Indian Constitution by ambedkar and banking constitution by RBI is drafted in such a way that a rich man can make money and can live on all hurdles and poor will remain poor with millions of hurdles in his life. 

Dear Ajay,

You need not degrade yourself. I also had not posted my comments with reference to your post with any intention to hurt you even slightly. I have just brought the facts before the audience. About the Parsi drummer, who would have narrated the saying of Nani Palkhivala, naturally, he would praise his own community man without weighing the pros & cons of the practicability of the saying, as Nani himself belonged to his Parsi community.

But, one thing, of course is a must, when we use or quote any such saying or speech, we must have to weigh the pros & cons of that and the circumstances in which that speech or saying was made. Otherwise, it would be a sheer example of 'reading between the lines' by ignoring the hard facts. That is what is happening in the Government of India and even the educational institutions. I would like to quote one instance of a University also, where a student of Master level was awarded 'F' Grade (Fail) in an assignment by the examiner, clearly quoting the reason that the student used his own research for preparing solution of assignment instead of using the module taught in the classroom. So, even in the Master level education, academics also do not want to go beyond their stereotype methods and styles. 

Mr. Ajay may like to see my detailed comments below about the speech of Nani Palkhivala.

Often we quote the speeches of the high dignitaries and politicians, but we forget that these people just get benefitted from out of these flaws of the laws or the constitution. These speeches are only of the academic use, but not practicable. They can make speech only, but practically fail to bring the intricacies of the jurisprudence to the knowledge of a common man or to remove the flaws. A jungle of laws is created and dumped in the books, but nobody, even the Government, thinks to make any arrangement to bring them to the knowledge of the common man, what to say of becoming their aware of the intricacies.

The intricacies of laws are such that even at all the times one or the other person may unintentionally be found violating some or the other provision of the law. A person (common man, not dignitary) comes to know only when he is caught or is framed intentionally and the authorities try to make the case so airtight that a common man cannot think of coming out of that honorably. For example, the Government has made several Rules and Procedure books fo several different departments, but don't distribute these Rule books to the working class, rather, one can find these books, either swallowed by white ants or becoming obsolete and auctioned at the dumping store depots of the Government making the public money totally waste.

On the other hand, Government has opened several premier institutions for 2 years full time training of UPSC direct recruit Probationer Officers spending lakhs of rupees per such trainee with several other facilities, but when it comes the turn of any departmental class-III or Class-IV employee (even Class-II employee) he has to spend his own earned leave at his own cost for the preparation of some promotional departmental examination with no such arrangement for their learning of Rules and regulations of even their own organization, what to say of the other provisions of law.

So, where the question arises for getting every citizen aware of and fight for his right.

But, still those direct recruits do not care to acquire the knowledge at the cost of the Government during all those two years.

I had an example, when early in 1990s, during my tenure as a training coordinator of a class of allied services officers, a lady probationer used her probation period to rear up her new born baby in full knowledge and facilities provided by the Director and the Additional Diector of the concerned Staff Training College, and the other was not aware of even the natue of leave admissible to her in spite of having trained in those rules.

I saw one more disgusting instance, where a high ranking officer specifically instructed in my presence the whole of the visiting batch of the probationary officers 'NOT TO TRUST PROMOTEES AT ANY COST', when they fully knew that they mostly depend upon the work of their subordinates.

So, what sort of equality we can expect from such type of officers of the Government of India.

With due apology to the noble soul of Nani Palkhiwala, Mr. Ajay may like to know that Mr. Palkhvala, could make huge earning only out of the loopholes in the juisprudence. He remained quite beyond the reach of a common man, for whom even no arrangement has ever been made to make him known even the ordinary provisions of the law and rules & regulations. Only the affluent society made use of his knowledge of the discriminating legal provisions.

If Mr. Ajay likes to know the background of Nani Palkhivala, when on application, he failed to get a job as a lecturer at Bombay University, he tried to obtain admission to institutions of higher learning to further his academic career. But, being late in the term, most courses were closed, and he had to enrol at Government Law College, Bombay, where he discovered that he had a GIFT for UNRALELLING THE INTRICACIES OF JURISPRUDENCE. (Quoted from Wikipedia).

So, even Nani Palkhivala, whose speech has been referred, used those intricacies to serve his own interests.

I really hate to say this, but Indian constitution though having all the tools to amend but is falling short of it, so I don't see India providing the same equality here. Media just highlights these issues but does nothing. And also people they just think its not them who will bring the change, they want the system to change by itself which is a distant dream.

I support Mr. Dhingra here, that Indian constitution that though proposals are made there is nobody who is taking care of, there is no accountability by the Indian government here and the common man has been left out and the rich are getting richer and poor  even more or the number is getting more as we can see the percentage of BPL(below poverty line) increasing like anything.