Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  3 of 5 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : Together we can
  Rate : 
 
Created by : Suryanarayan Murthy, Free lancer  | 12 22 2011 11:05:55 +0000
Industry : Public Sector/GovernmentFunctional Area : India(Markets)
Activity:  2109 views;  last activity : 04 16 2012 00:09:01 +0000

Indian Democracy has the First Past The Post (FPTP) as its electoral system to provide representation to voters in State Assemblies and in the Parliament of India 

This representation system allows political parties to come to power both in the States and at the Centre with woeful minority of votes.  

Parties with less than 30% of votes win more percentage of seats and claim the right to form governments. This leaves out a vast majority of voters unrepresented in governance. 

This is because majority is understood to be the one who gets more number of votes than other contestants instead of being over 50%. There are members in the present Lok Sabha who got less than 10% votes but won the seat as others did not manage to get that many votes. There are only 5 members in the present Lok Sabha who have won with more than 50% of votes. 

The percentage of votes that a party gains is not the same as the percentage of seats it gains in this electoral system. This enables parties with fewer votes to gain more seats and come to power. 

The present electoral system in India encourages corruption, use of muscle power, communalism etc. in order to gain the slight margin of winning votes. The parties that come to power are not mandated by the citizens. Only parties that have the power to manipulate voters are able to come to power. These are generally parties that have dominant, fascist, communal and casteist ideology.  

CERI (Campaign for Electoral Reforms in India) proposes a Proportionate Electoral System in India. This system is being widely in practice in many democracies of the world and more and more countries in the world are shifting to Proportional Representation (PR). 

In PR electoral system any party can gain seats only in proportion to the percentage of votes that it gains. There will not be any difference between the percentage of votes and the percentage of seats. Thus only parties with more percentage of voter support can come to power.  

In PR system majority means more than 50% of votes

Source: www.ceri.in

 
 Refer 281
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Electoral Reforms are required now ! Vs Electoral reforms are not required at this stage !
14
 
 
 
 
3
29
5
Support   Support
Top Argument
3
0

I do understand Renashmi's apprehension regarding the electoral reforms. Her views on a bill being enacted by a house that is splattered with many parties is thought provoking. But I still feel that the reforms should go forward. All reforms have to be carried out simultaneously.

Just economic empoverment will be meaningless. Further a action delayed is no action. It is better to try and make a mistzake than to sit back and cry over faultlines. After all India has a very flexible constitution and we can rectify our mistakes.

But the job should be entrusted to a group of professionals who are well aware of the nitty gritties of the system on hand. It cannot be handled in an ad-hoc manner. A thorough and purposeful study should be carried out to bring about a lean and effective bill for the first stage of electoral reforms. (We do not surely want another Jan Lokpal - Lok Pal fiasco, Do we?).

The economic reforms of the first stage was a success because professionals handled it. With advise by scholars of law, social dynamics, international economic conditions etc. Now we should start on taking the financial reforms to its logical second stage (penetration of the lower segment). And we should simultaneously work on further electoral reforms. Both economic and political enhancement are needed for true empowerment.


By Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels  01 27 2012 13:18:08 +0000
 
Top Argument
2
0

I have very strong feelings on this matter. In this period of fractured Lok Sabha's. I have felt this for a long time and it has only been confirmed during the Lok Sabha proceedings on Lok Pal. The least we need now is the right to vote being tampered with by self-appointed guardians of the people. A party without half the strength of the numbers should not be allowed to touch the electoral system. Otherwise we will have a cruel joke on our hands.


By Renashmi Kaur, Events/Promotion Executive, Eventzo Delight Pvt. Ltd.  01 01 2012 13:02:51 +0000
Arguments in: "Electoral Reforms"
1
0
Education is no guarantee against excessive greed in my opinion. As far as Jaygopal's contention, I think the FIR is also too far fetched. You can get a FIR filed against even the most honest person. This is easy especially for people who have a leverage on power. Thus it becomes even more difficult for people outside the polity to come in. It will in all probability boomerang. I think this two aspects are always brought to the fore by politicians and power brokers who want to maintain the status - qua.
By Shameena W., Admin Manager, Wizcraft Inc.  | 02 13 2012 11:12:38 +0000
0
0
I think we are in urgent need of electoral reforms without diluting the basic essence that of universal adult franchise. The most basic of reforms that need to be bought into the system is that of any candidate having an FIR not being able to contest irrespective of whether he is yet to be proved guilty or not. Plus the need to bring in educated candidates into the system. It must be made mandatory for candidates to have at least a PG qualification as running the country is not a joke like what the current set of politicians have turned it into !
By Jaygopal Raghavan, Marketing Manager, Landmark Group  | 01 31 2012 19:25:10 +0000
0
0
I am strongly in favor of electoral reforms as its badly needed in this lifetime for benefit of judiciary and reliability and trust of people toward justice.
By Naveen Malik, LLB student, Faculty of Law Delhi University, New Delhi  | 01 27 2012 09:47:03 +0000
0
0
I want to support this side, as these are necessary to be done in coming days. Thanks for referral, Murthy SIR.
By SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd  | 01 27 2012 06:45:24 +0000
1
0
Thorough changes are required in our election Laws. It has to be amended and changed to suit the current and future situations.
By Shashi Kumar U, Manager accounts & commercial, Mazda Concrete Products Pvt Ltd  | 01 02 2012 03:48:39 +0000
2
0
I think we have a fine electoral machinery in place. The EVMs have acknowledged abroad too and India has got orders for the same from other countries for their electoral process. What is needed is following the rules of the games. Most of the times the fraud is committed before the actual voting. Thiese malpractices includes using sectarian issues etc. in campaigning, fraudulent electoral rolls in the villages, and preventing sections of the people from voting even when they come forward to.
By Shameena W., Admin Manager, Wizcraft Inc.  | 01 01 2012 08:45:40 +0000
0
0

Thanks to Mr vinoy and etc  for  such topics , Reform is always a continuous process .

About our discussion  find a solution that will cover every ones interest and intention.

(assure  royalty if implemented @ Re 1 per vote to P-rak )

Secret ballet voting system  intact

Transparency in voting  sure

Record Proof of voting possible

Online counting possible

Cross check  or verification possible  audit possible

Vulnerable, Injury , insecurity  chances  NIL

                                SOLUTION

As I have said  voting access paper issued by EC to voters  Call it as access paper –AP

AP will be having name of voter and Code number .

When u vote in a conventional way ie  Machine should  have arrangement in which AP will be inserted or accessed .

When actual vote is given by voter – Machine will Print /assign voters code no to Vote give ,while executing vote in machine- Voting no is allocated by machine to that specific vote  both these  nos will be assigned to vote and it is for official purpose ie EC record. It could be digital or print.

Only Vote No will be printed on AP . which will not give any logo and any contestants  details.or separate print of Voters name .code (AP) and Vote no . 

That will give u all ur secret ballet purpose.

U can give online display  after some time schedule -30 minute gap .

Voter will get proof of vote which will be having record with Ec . in which  No Name of Candidate and his logo is mentioned that is secret , so safety of Citizens is there. No CW/threats /hounding etc

Vote No  and  voters nos is only printed for  EC record so in any cross check and verifications  no one can easily find the Voters name and details  so secret ballet status mentioned with proof and records .

It could be worth .

To ur comment voter can check his own vote not any others vote . Being voting is coded  ur secret ballet is succeeding. Higher version of secret ballet.

to my comment -Constitutional area should be fixed to one district only . one district should not have three four constituency.  As local ,regional things play main role for all aspect s.


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 28 2011 08:31:27 +0000
0
1

We desperately need this bill, however, who will bell the cat as those who can bring about a change are the influential politicos who are under the scanner for abusing power, corruption, theft, nepotism. It appears nearly impossible to implement electoral reforms in the country and in case if it ever comes, it will never see the light of the day as has been happening with the Lokpal Bill....cheats, corrupts are ruling and plundering this nation.....who cares.....


By Rajiv Azad (Thinks out of Box), Manager, Communications, Branding and Content Development , Leading Hyderabad based organization  | 12 28 2011 04:52:07 +0000
0
0

Mr Vinoy and Mr Murthy sir, I am not going away from topic . Open voting could be reform transparency, scope for cross check and verifications , it could be strong solution.

Issue comes out on argument, if in open voting people will be threatened,injured. In such case it could be the parameter/indication of the situation, where people are threatened injured for self benefit . It could be force /pressure on people /citizens by contestants i.e. politicians. so could it be free democratic atmosphere?

Such situations /threats ,could provoke people to outbreak for their right to have free and safe votings (Open ballet) for there basic rights.

I do not think secret ballet system is strong healthy and transparent.It could be basic cause of the topic.

Candidate who wins is representative of that constituency for development, growth and facilities to that area . Authority rights to Ministers come By electoral process. Basic objective should be for people and not Ministers own rights, authority for self benefits.

Voting has direct link to Authority and rights of Ministers 

Clean way of electing members is nothing wrong first step for Strong and Healthy Nation


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 27 2011 08:57:25 +0000
2
0

Sorry P-rak, I did not remember seeing the topic you had raised. Any way we can consider the same. But frankly as regards the debate, I think I have misunderstood what you are suggestion is! Are you debating that the vote cast should be on record (that is every one can access the information of the vote cast by a individual. i.e who has voted for whom.) Please clarify. If your suggestion is as above, then sorry i think it goes against the very grain of secret ballot. Or have I misunderstood your point?


By Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels  | 12 26 2011 14:46:05 +0000
0
0

Mr. Vinoy what u asked is first thing comes to mind because it could be real.

I have mentioned another head for PIG civil security –law and order.

I cannot deny, it could be in more rural parts . but law and order could cover it.

If Citizens can’t vote this way then what is free India Developed India. What are citizen rights? When British rule ,people don’t have right to say ,still u have same atmosphere that u cannot have transparent voting ,techno savvy voting ,then I don’t find citizens are in Free India .

Citizens are more important or political representatives .

citizens vote for what ,there growth development or for own salvage. So people are fit, such problem could be thrown out. I don’t find it could be problem.

If such thing occurs –at Extrem level -citizens are 121 crore, how many politicians concentration 1 crore max ,who will dominate and leader politicians could be less than 1 lack . Politicians will surrender. Civil war ,or anger presently in world parts is alive example .

So such vulnerable happens people can strongly reply .

If Politicians use forces on people ,India will definitely see deadly civil war in next 7 to 10 years.

Representatives are elected for whom for Growth ,development , comforts of people or to make representatives small kings, rulers.

A Minister is elected what they ought to do for people ,what people should get in there constituency by default without nagging ,find it ?

So electoral reform is also related to rights /facilities people should get in there areas and nation as a whole for development and rankings of nation at global level.

Election is the starting point of the story

So. I like to have comments on Reservation s In elections () !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 26 2011 12:07:32 +0000
0
0
Mr vinoy Machine ballet is just not sufficient. Proof of vote is Imp as wel on line counting and transparency is equally Imp who has has voted to whom should be record and More, Voting and counting Audit could be Important Factor. and next till voter can found his record at EC office.
By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 26 2011 11:42:03 +0000
0
0
P-rak, with due respect to your view that the vote cast should be transparent as it makes an ordinary citizen more vulnerable to vested political interests who have huge influence because of their hold of religion and caste dynamics.
By Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels  | 12 26 2011 07:45:05 +0000
0
0
Nicely summed upby bu p-rak.
By Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India  | 12 26 2011 06:38:00 +0000
0
0

Why open voting system

Presence of EC office ,access of people to EC office , Cross checking of voting  transaction, support to stop fake voting . documentation  of vote is proof and record to voter.citizens are not coming empty handed only mark on finger.

Such record could be used  for future wave of rejecting elected member as proof and u can reject to whom u have voted not to other member.

With Ec office ,any time voter should have facility to reject group or candidate throught the year. Any measurable no in time could lead to action.


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 25 2011 09:17:26 +0000
0
0

Electoral Reforms

Contributions in topic ER are good.

Increase in No of voting .

Tenure of any elected party is normally assumed to be 5 years ie 1825 days election Campion is almost 50 to 60 days And actual election day is only one which altogether a wrong ratio/very short time. Voting days should be kept for at least ten to fifteen days . It will support to increase the no of persons voting throught India. % of voting will Increase specially in Metro and big cities. Professional and educated persons voting is important .Increase in Time of voting will motivate and keep space for people to vote could lead to increase in % of voting .It could be real opinion of people.

Voting poll system should be shifted to Banks and Post office which are throught India which is possible specially in all big cities .

Open Voting system

Voting system should be open ,to whom u have voted should be open and declared through modern technology of Information systems ,web sites, counting should be shifted from ballet machine storage and secret system to open system and counting will be online and open . Transparency in counting of votes is equally important. Machine it self count vote and displays, could lead to  technical misuse for benefit.

Shift from individual Constituency to Entire State

As already expressed is very correct. India is having 121 crore people . One Minister coming from One constituency having Very small no of person concentration compared to Total Indian Population and of which his winning share is less than 70 to 50 % of actual voting. And that persons leads the entire ministry for the whole nation. So reform could be made that that group of 25 to 30 or more or less contestant should be made and voted by the entire state for central elections ,they should be unique for entire state . It should not be by constituency but by entire state Individual constituency could be kept for State level elections. So percentage  strategy of voters could have meaning to lead entire nation by different ministers. It could l help to stop alliance governments, which could stop buying of elected representatives and such happenings. Elected party will have hassle free rule on nation for passing bills and executing decisions . Help for separating discussion issue debates and decision and execution of policy passing of bills etc.


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 25 2011 09:05:44 +0000
0
1

Mr Vinoy why secret ballot .

I find that starting point of the system –voting- is keeping space for intangibility /no identification / no verification. Citizens wants transparency in national information /RTI /details from govt agencies – information’s kept accessible to people. What harm it will make if information are opened /identified and verified ,could be first step to curb corruption and malpractice

If people not safe to reach to voting booths and criminology what Indians have done for the basic right . It could be one more title Civil security -law and order in PIG.


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 25 2011 09:02:11 +0000
0
0

Election commission infrastructure

Election commission which is autonomous body  should have a strong infrastructure base in every district of India.

It could be 10 /15 storied buildings  /office for every district.5000 sq feet for every floor

All super computer servers and data of citizens,technology implemented in Ec offices .  

EC office  should be functional for the year.

Any birth /death ,migrations, census should be accounted in EC office  parallel to municipal corporations .

any citizen can record his name in EC office ,any query he can solve with Ec office  throught the year.

Currently People find difficult to find there names in list and such list are not available to people.If no name in list no voting.any political party gives voting card with poll booth and room no and list no then only people can approch

With such techno base people could vote from any voting place in India or state.

People should  get  access papers to vote by EC Office

Every voter could get his proof of vote   with his photo snapped by voting machine and to who he has voted . It should be valid for next electoral process


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 25 2011 08:56:25 +0000
1
0

Wonderful to see the community up and going after my Christmas vacation. Yes! Electoral reforms are a must. The members of a party with less than a percentage of the total votes cast in the election to the house should not be allowed to hold a constitutional post. This may possibly lead to avoid splitting of existing parties and unnecessary sprouting of new parties. This could in turn make the choice of the voter more leaner and purposeful.


By Shameena W., Admin Manager, Wizcraft Inc.  | 12 25 2011 06:39:18 +0000
1
0

P-rak! I agree with your first point. The effort should be made to get maximum people to express their vote. As for transparency of ballot cast proposed it is a no-no - because goes against the very grain on secret ballot. The final point I am not clear of your point. If possible please clarify.


By Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels  | 12 24 2011 14:58:04 +0000
0
0
Thanks, Muralidharan Ji for your valuable inputs. Let this become the basis for discussions.
By Suryanarayan Murthy, Free lancer  | 12 24 2011 10:09:45 +0000
0
0

Thanx P-rak. Looking forward to your support to PIGS


By Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels  | 12 24 2011 08:00:39 +0000
0
0

Sir! It is befitting that you kick of the start of debates in the PIG. I for one am all for serious major electoral reforms. But even before that is done I think that we should look at a re-organization of states. That is a major electoral change though you cannot strictly call bandy it as part of electoral reforms. But such a move especially making smaller states with parity in voice in matters of state will go a long way in making large-scale changes in the administration of the India


By Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels  | 12 23 2011 16:01:37 +0000
1
0

It is very much required for a better india. obviously our politicians are so much crooked. Any act,rule or regulation which are not in favour of them they will never allow to pass in the parliament. we presently seeing the condition of lokpal bill. So electoral reforms should become an agenda and party who supports it we should vote and this agenda should be implemented as a first decision after government formation and it cannot be changed or withdrawn without the consent of the people and supreme court.  Then only we can get electoral reforms.  If it really happens we can see new india.


By manikanta raj, Deputy Manager Finance, project financing, leading Financing company  | 12 23 2011 10:03:34 +0000
3
0

Thanks to Ms Shanti ,Ms Shameena and Mr vinod etc for PIG . What u write is meaning ful ,worth .I will contribute some views which may help some citizens to think and have attitude.


By Prasad Kanhere, Technology developemnt, Sivaa Tech  | 12 23 2011 08:36:17 +0000
2
0
The Law Commission of India proposed what it called “An alterative method of election” in its 170th report titled “Reform of the Electoral Law” submitted in 1999. Devoting a full part (Part VIII) of their report to this issue, the Law Commission said, “This method goes a long way in ensuring purity of elections, keeping out criminals and other undesirable elements and also serves to minimise the role and importance of caste and religion.” The Law Commission described the alternative method in the following terms: “(a) no candidate should be declared elected unless he obtains at least 50% of the votes cast; (b) the ballot paper shall contain a column at the end which can be marked by a voter who is not inclined to vote for any of the candidates on the ballot paper, which is called hereinafter as `negative vote'. (A voter can cast a negative vote only when he is not inclined to vote for any of the candidates on the ballot paper); (c) for the purposes of calculating the fifty per cent votes of the votes cast, even the negative votes will be treated as `votes cast'; (d) if no person gets 50% or more votes, then there should be a `run-off' election between the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes; (e) in the run-off election too, there should be a provision for a negative vote and even here there should be a requirement that only that candidate will be declared elected who receives 50% or more of the `votes cast' as explained hereinabove; (f) if no candidate gets 50% or more of the votes cast in the run-off, there should be a fresh election from that constituency" (Para 8.1). Explaining the rationale of the method, the Law Commission said, “This method of election is designed to achieve two important objectives viz., (i) to cut down or, at any rate, to curtail the significance and role played by caste factor in the electoral process. There is hardly any constituency in the country where anyone particular caste can command more than 50% of the votes. This means that a candidate has to carry with him several castes and communities, to succeed; (ii) the negative vote is intended to put moral pressure on political parties not to put forward candidates with undesirable record i.e., criminals, corrupt elements and persons with unsavory background” (Para 8.2). Recognising ground realities and making a balanced assessment, the Law Commission continued, “No doubt this method calls for a run-off and a fresh election in case no candidate obtains 50% or more votes even in the run-off, and in that sense expensive and elaborate, yet it has the merit of compelling the political parties to put forward only good candidates and to eschew bad characters and corrupt elements” (Para 8.2.1). Not being oblivious of the issues arising out of the implementation of this “alternative method of election”, the Law Commission observed, “If the above practical difficulties and problems can be overcome, the idea of 50%+1 vote -- and even the idea of negative vote (as explained hereinabove), can be implemented. We may mention that if electronic voting machines are introduced throughout the country, it will become a little more easier to hold a run-off election inasmuch as it would then be not necessary to print fresh ballot papers showing the names of the two candidates competing in the run-off -- or for that matter, for holding a fresh election (in case the idea of negative vote is also given effect to)” (Emphasis added) (Para 8.7). According to ex-IIM Professor Chhokar, this may appear to be a cumbersome and tedious process but it will nudge the entire system in the direction of (a) better representative-ness among the elected representatives by reducing the sectarian effects of vote banks, and (b) encouraging political parties to put up better candidates.
By S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner  | 12 22 2011 11:52:04 +0000
2
0

Indian Democracy has the First Past The Post (FPTP) as its electoral system which allows political parties to come to power both in the States and at the Centre with woeful minority of votes. Parties with less than 30% of votes win more percentage of seats and claim the right to form governments.  

This is because majority is understood to be the one who gets more number of votes than other contestants instead of being over 50%.  In Proportional Representation system majority means more than 50% of votes. Thus only parties with more percentage of voter support can come to power.  

Let us go for Electoral Reforms first !!

 


By Suryanarayan Murthy, Free lancer  | 12 22 2011 11:05:55 +0000
0
0

What happened to this topic. It has gone cold for a long time.

Vinoy, I do realized that you have understood what I was apprehensive about. But you still support the reforms during this times. I really appreciate your positive attitude. But I am very troubled with the thought of this polity tinkering with the basic right to vote. They are likely to make a mockery of the bill and attention seekers like Anna Harare will further add to the mess.

The guidelines you have mentioned for carrying out this reforms are commendable. But highly impracticable in this polity and society. Yet your vouching for electoral reforms going with economic reforms does seems right. But unfortunately this polity cannot be involved as we have seen with the Lok Pal fiasco.

Finally, thanx Vinoy and Murthy Sir for getting PIG in order. The debates are wonderful and I am very hopeful for the future of it. The moderators are the right mix of experience & expertise. Feel privileged to be part of this movement.


By Renashmi Kaur, Events/Promotion Executive, Eventzo Delight Pvt. Ltd.  | 01 30 2012 14:50:25 +0000
2
0

I agree with Shameena that before we start changing the electoral system. we need to enforce the one in place today.

And I also want to defer with you Murthy Sir, on your proposal of 50%. Till today no individual party has a 50% margin in the lower house in terms of votes polled. The chances of this been attained in near future seems highly improbable. Even in a presidential system like US, very rarely do the President cross the 50%.

We in India do have many parties and there is bound to be splitting of votes. So percentage being achieved is impossible. We of-course, cannot ask the smaller parties to shut shop. And the parliamentary system is the only option in India with diversity in people and citizens still thinking in terms of local identity very strongly.


By Renashmi Kaur, Events/Promotion Executive, Eventzo Delight Pvt. Ltd.  | 01 01 2012 13:01:54 +0000
0
0
Shameena & Renashmi ! It is you who suggested setting up a forum on Too Step. What happened and where is your response? Or backed out ?
By Suryanarayan Murthy, Free lancer  | 12 29 2011 08:28:53 +0000
1
0
It became necessary for me to act as a moderator (which I never anticipated in my own chosen topic). Hence the other side !! Every individual has a right to chose. And it must be secret. Otherwise he will be hounded. No open ballot system. Dear friend P-rak, to avoid a civil war, we need electoral reforms. Electoral Reforms, in simple language means, any body who gets less than 50% of the votes is not elected. Start with the basics, man ! Elect the right kind of people and get the right kind of govt. Dont let somebody who gets less than 10% votes rule you. That's what I mean !!
By Suryanarayan Murthy, Free lancer  | 12 27 2011 07:55:04 +0000
Leading recruitment Firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
Recently Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal expressed concern at the increasing...
 
687 referals 22 votes, 1277 views
In India we seen the instances where bigger states are sub divided in to smaller states like...
 
3 referals 9 arguments, 3256 views
Reinventing the United Nations is crucial to protect the poorest inhabitants of the planet, at a...
 
188 referals 5 comments, 197 views
more...  
 
More From Author
Good Evening sir, In fact I thought of requesting you to write an article on this particular subject - since you know better than us. Whenever I read an article on this issue in various papers, my mind goes back to Indira Gandhi era. What would have...
Great advice sir. I will send it to my daughter and other friends !!!!
Dear Mr. Vedant !!! Setting up a association/union to resolve issues with the management is not a good idea. Honestly!!! Any issue can be settled amicably, across the table. The prerequisites are (a) discuss openly (b) try to understand the other...
more...