In my opinion motivation alone cannot be the casue why a employee should stay back if he does not get the hike he requires but gets it in market then the employee is bound to move on No manager will feel comfortable losing a trained resource but it is the managemnet who decides on hike in salary adn not manager alone If even after the proposal for a salary hike by manager the same is not given and employee moves then is the manager still to blame Employee has been given outstanding rating and tehn geta hike of say 10% but the market give him 25% emplyee will move out becasue he gets a higher designation abetter salary which he did not get in hi spresent organisation Motivation does not fulfills any persons basic need
By
Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance
| 02 10 2010 09:53:18 +0000
Though your point seems to be valid in most organisation it is found the manager is able to understand the reportee well & the relationship is also coordial but when my point si if reportee does not get the required hike in his/ her salary even though recomneded by the manager then is the manager responsible alone As per company motivation by manager to his reportee will help the company retain the employee but at the end of day every employee wants to rise & earn more so then how does the Manager tackle this scenario
By
Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance
| 02 10 2010 09:47:40 +0000
I belive the company is responsible becasue 1) If he/she was a good resource hence he/she got good ratings from his boss but the company did not choose to encrease his / her salary 2) Motivation does help you increase standard of living of a person alone 3) Motivation does not help you lead a decent life alone 4) Bosses also know the value of a good resource but the management (company) may choose to ignore the views of the boss 5) It is all based on how the relation of the boss has with his boss and how the bigger boss has relation with his reporting authority
By
Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance
| 02 05 2010 14:19:16 +0000
|
A good topic chosen......I believe that most boss says that he/she cannot make 100% employee satisfaction with the decisions he/she takes or impliments but taken into consideration, if the boss is conduting the ritual of conducting meeting with the fellow employees then the decision of quiting the job does not arise at all because what I believe that employee satisfaction matters a lot for the company to loose a good resource and now a days the company HR's are thinking a lot to curtail down this decision by making new tools to capture the employee satisfaction on confidential basis and taking rightful measures against the same.
By
Rana Deep Bhattacharyya, Executive Officer, HSBC Holdings
| 03 31 2010 17:16:13 +0000
Mostly the Reporting Manager is responsible, at the first instance he is one who administers the desired role , expected delivery required by the organisation and if the path shown by him is matching to the requirements to both the side ( employee & employer) then there is no chance left for the employee to think before taking the alternative ways to leave.
By
Rajesh Sharma, Manager
| 02 24 2010 05:25:32 +0000
Usually it is due to the managers. One can work for a poor company if the boss is helping and understanding. But you can't work in the world best organization if you have a boss who doesn't value integrity, recognition, and development of employees. If a manager provides creates an open and friendly environment, then people can work even if the company is not very employee friendly.
By
Saad Iqbal, Manager Support Center, Warid Telecom International Limited
| 02 20 2010 12:50:04 +0000
Me to think Manager is responsible for exit as it is duty of manager to make reportee and employee feel confortable to work... Its not easy for even employee to leave after 2-3 years of work...All thtz matter is Manager relation tht take care of employee and his/her progress and motivation.
By
Hardeep Dobal, Project Engineer, Shah Technical Consultants
| 02 06 2010 19:51:09 +0000
- In my opinion it is the manager’s responsibility to follow-up and learn as much as they can know why the employee has decided to make a change and then HR should conduct an exit interview that includes questions about leadership, the organization, salary, benefits, environment and more. There might be more of an onus on the immediate manager because it's their job to ensure the employee is challenged, has enough responsibilities and tasks, and provides the best possible avenues for career advancement and success. If the immediate manager was not working towards these goals, then there may be a bit of blame that can be attributed.
By
Nikhil Jain, Senior Consultant, Hewitt Associates
| 02 06 2010 08:06:09 +0000
|