Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  3 of 3 in Topic 
 
Created by : Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance  | 02 05 2010 14:02:57 +0000
Industry : BankingFunctional Area : Productivity & Performance(Strategy & Execution)
Keywords : exit
Activity:  302 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

As we near March we will see many exits in our organisations it what I call a "migration of employees period"

Given this thought I am just wondering if a perosn employed in a company is not satisfied with his pay though his reporting manager has given him  a good rating but still after putting 2-3 yrs of service and then gets a great offer from a new company a competitior

Should that person not taek up the job

Is his reporting authority to be blamed for the exit

Is motivation the only way a employee can be retained by  company and if still the empolyee leave is that employees boss solely responsible for the exodus

Just spare athough on this, all of us have left our jobs for better ones but is this blaming the boss by the company justified

Is the company not responsible in at all

 

 
 Refer 12
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Company is resposible Vs Boss is responsible
1
 
 
 
 
5
3
5
Support   Support
 
0
0

In my opinion motivation alone cannot be the casue why a employee should stay back if he does not get the hike he requires but gets it in market then the employee is bound to move on 

No manager will feel comfortable losing a trained resource but it is the managemnet who decides on hike in salary adn not manager alone

If even after the proposal for a salary hike by manager the same is not given  and employee moves then is the manager still to blame


Employee has been given outstanding rating and tehn geta hike of say 10% but the market give him 25% emplyee will move out becasue he gets a higher designation  abetter salary which he did not get in hi spresent organisation

Motivation does not fulfills any persons basic need

 


By Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance  | 02 10 2010 09:53:18 +0000
0
0

Though your point seems to be valid in most organisation it is found the manager is able to understand the reportee well & the relationship is also coordial but when my point si if reportee does not get the required hike in his/ her salary even though recomneded by the manager then is the manager responsible alone

As per company motivation by manager to his reportee will help the company retain the employee but at the end of day every employee  wants to rise & earn more so then how does the Manager tackle this scenario


By Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance  | 02 10 2010 09:47:40 +0000
0
0

I belive the company is responsible becasue

1) If he/she was a good resource hence he/she got good ratings  from his boss but the company did not choose to encrease his / her salary

2) Motivation does help you increase standard of living of a person alone

3) Motivation does not help you lead a decent life alone

4) Bosses also know the value of a good resource but the management (company) may choose to ignore the views of the boss

5) It is all based on how the relation of the boss has with his boss and how the bigger  boss has relation with his reporting authority


By Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance  | 02 05 2010 14:19:16 +0000
0
0

A good topic chosen......I believe that most boss says that he/she cannot make 100% employee satisfaction with the decisions he/she takes or impliments but taken into consideration, if the boss is conduting the ritual of conducting meeting with the fellow employees then the decision of quiting the job does not arise at all because what I believe that employee satisfaction matters a lot for the company to loose a good resource and now a days the company HR's are thinking a lot to curtail down this decision by making new tools to capture the employee satisfaction on confidential basis and taking rightful measures against the same.


By Rana Deep Bhattacharyya, Executive Officer, HSBC Holdings  | 03 31 2010 17:16:13 +0000
0
0

Mostly the Reporting Manager  is responsible, at the first instance he is one who administers the desired role , expected delivery required by the organisation and if the path shown by him is matching to the requirements to both the side ( employee & employer) then there is no chance left for the employee to think before taking the alternative ways to leave.


By Rajesh Sharma, Manager  | 02 24 2010 05:25:32 +0000
0
0

Usually it is due to the managers. One can work for a poor company if the boss is helping and understanding. But you can't work in the world best organization if you have a boss who doesn't value integrity, recognition, and development of employees.

If a manager provides creates an open and friendly environment, then people can work even if the company is not very employee friendly.


By Saad Iqbal, Manager Support Center, Warid Telecom International Limited  | 02 20 2010 12:50:04 +0000
0
1

Me to think Manager is responsible for exit as it is duty of manager to make reportee and employee feel confortable to work... Its not easy for even employee to leave after 2-3 years of work...All thtz matter is Manager relation tht take care of employee and his/her progress and motivation.


By Hardeep Dobal, Project Engineer, Shah Technical Consultants  | 02 06 2010 19:51:09 +0000
0
1
In my opinion it is the manager’s responsibility to follow-up and learn as much as they can know why the employee has decided to make a change and then HR should conduct an exit interview that includes questions about leadership, the organization, salary, benefits, environment and more. There might be more of an onus on the immediate manager because it's their job to ensure the employee is challenged, has enough responsibilities and tasks, and provides the best possible avenues for career advancement and success. If the immediate manager was not working towards these goals, then there may be a bit of blame that can be attributed.

By Nikhil Jain, Senior Consultant, Hewitt Associates  | 02 06 2010 08:06:09 +0000
Leading professional Executive Search and Management Consultancy Group
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
corruption in india
 
58 referals 26 arguments, 431 views
Workplace harassment is now a major concern amongst the employees. Daily employees get harassed...
 
890 referals 33 votes, 1826 views
Today in India the employee rate is increasing drastically. But are the employees aware of their...
 
397 referals 16 votes, 2740 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (4)
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 482 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
MNC's should take in more freshers vs Do not take freshers
 
1 referals 2 arguments, 161 views
more...  
More From Author
MAmta Banerjee is only interested in starting tarins from Bengal and taking pot shots at CPI (M) and Congress in Bengal she is nto interested in Railways at all   She is never in Delhi and instwead fo visitng the crash site and taking stock she is...
Increase in insurance cover According to the new guidelines,insurance cover for both regular premium policy and single premium policy has increased.For those below 45 years old,the minimum death cover will be 10 times the annualised premium...
However,financial experts say if protecting conservative customers was the aim of IRDA,it got everything wrong.A conservative investor has the option of investing in a pension product that would invest predominantly in debt.Even in debt,you cant...
more...