It will, because if he/she doesn’t have the time then they won’t login to face book, but if they are getting the option to be in touch with face book users and frnds via email which they daily use. Then it will hold good and better to save the time also....just only to save the time they ay use "Comment via email"
By
Mohammed Abdul Bari, Network Support Engineer@ETISALAT, Dubai
| 01 20 2010 06:19:50 +0000
If I can respond to debates without going through the tedious web based login protocols, i think it is definitely more attractive. i for one support this change. I do nopt normally get involved in social networking sites but if one can be part of the give and take of constructive debate, without going through the other aspects, it is definitely worth it.
By
RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants
| 01 17 2010 04:33:59 +0000
It is always helpfu option I mean OPTION to comment on email when you are busy/in public.... And you have option to login to interact with joining facebook whenever it time is fit to do so.
By
Ashoka B kalgude, Executive, Biocon India
| 01 17 2010 00:43:00 +0000
Now population is increasing on facebook...hence it is required to have this feature..otherwise people depend on the yahoo, gmail etc for private opinion/ information sharing. Its good and ofcourse traffic on gmail and yahoo will be reduced substantially.
By
Nitin M Aras, XYZ
| 01 16 2010 12:19:18 +0000
I'd say the response to alerts from Facebook would increase for at times one is too busy so rather would simply reply to the alert at hand rather than wait for time to login and reply. Besides the more convenient it becomes for a user to use a system/application/site it makes it more accessible and popular. Yes the traffic to the site may fall a bit but over a period of time it would be more beneficial for the site.
By
Rakesh Ojha, Head/VP/GM-Sales, E2 Solutions
| 01 16 2010 11:43:28 +0000
|
I agree with what sivakrishna said and like to throw some light to it. The reason why it will not increase because facebook does not only have comments it has many other features for which we need to log into facebook. If people start replying through mail then other features will be of no use and I don't think it will be interesting to reply through mail.
By
Leena Pawar, Tech Architect, IT Infotech
| 02 03 2010 07:48:54 +0000
This means that one has to just add friends in facebook and can do the interaction thru mails, instead of this people can directly interact thru their mails.i dont think there will be decline in the logging in users for facebook. most of the users log on to facebook for fun and its apps.
By
Khursheed Ahmed Mohammed, Software Consultant, IBM India Pvt. limited.
| 01 17 2010 13:09:54 +0000
Yup, even i would say replying merely thru email would not be encouraged or used to that extent as been mentioned. People use this more as social site than professional. And therefore, i feel email would not play a vital role using Facebook. .. .Thank you, Manish N Cheers!!
By
Manish N Chugh, Officer Trainee, Stock Holding Corporation of India ltd.,
| 01 17 2010 05:41:58 +0000
as a very short user of facebook m not aware of every ferature of it but yes i can say that nw days i am using it ferquently just because of m boared of orkut and yahoo. & i found some kool new features of facebook. i dont think it will decrease the effectivity of it but also sure that it will not increase its effectivity.
By
prasad shrotri, Design Engineer, DELIGHT DESIGN PROCESSES AND AUTOMATION
| 01 16 2010 16:17:15 +0000
Agreed Sonam. In fact I am against using cell phones as a tool for social networking that too via sms. I think its too time consuming, it will actually hamper people's functionality and would have more people where their workplace has the social networks blocked hooked via phones to these sites. I am not for this kind of cell phone usage at all!! Thanks for the referral Sonam :)
By
Makrand Bhave, Marketing & MICE, WIZCRAFT International
| 01 16 2010 10:59:43 +0000
|