Our nation is boverned by givt of india or supreme court?
By
LAXMAN KESHWALA, Freelancer, Telecom/ISP
| 05 21 2012 21:09:19 +0000
"It was wrong to sell wireless spectrum" http://wp.me/p1ZsI2-3 Also read "Telecom Industrialists need caution on broad band network ideas that do not fit in the future? http://wp.me/p1ZsI2-4s
By
Abraham Paul, Senior Telecom Consultant, FCOMNET- Future Groups
| 02 21 2012 17:55:06 +0000
What is the use of laws,Only common man is target for law and punishment? Even after our Hom.P.M.waken op and made some meetings and other activities not implying judgement but tryed to twist it.
By
LAXMAN KESHWALA, Freelancer, Telecom/ISP
| 02 13 2012 18:58:38 +0000
I think the people in general are waking up to the dangers of going back on the balance of power crafted in our constitution.
By
Shameena W., Admin Manager, Wizcraft Inc.
| 02 13 2012 10:31:32 +0000
And also thank god this UPA showed some spine at last in this case.Got to praise the Defense Minister. Seems to be a strong man other than most of his colleagues.
By
Makesh Sharma, Bio/Pharma Informatics-Associate/Scientist, Micros Labs
| 02 13 2012 06:36:12 +0000
Thank God the SC stayed of the army chief's matter.
By
Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels
| 02 11 2012 06:20:24 +0000
It is sad indeed that the ruling party, opposition, media and social groups are using corruption issues to gain mileage. Now even the Judiciary has joined in. Really it seems to be a age of degradation all institutions of our country. Nobody seems sincere to bring the crooks to book.
By
Shanti Roshan, Accounts Manager, Aditya Birla Group
| 02 07 2012 07:35:33 +0000
@ Sriniwas ji. The whole issue on 2G is viewed as the case of judicial activism, in a larger public interest as claimed by many of us. If that would be the case why the Judiciary kept a closed eye on the already issued licenses. Why not the old cases scrapped as well. Amusingly, the SC clarified on the issue that the old cases were not suit-filed against, hence not scrapped. Has not the policy of larger public interest gone for a six again.
By
Peeyush Chauhan, BANKER, GOVT BANK
| 02 06 2012 04:24:20 +0000
Dear Sumeetji, After the latest judgement of Delhi court have you realized why PC was not given strictures by the government whereas D. Raja was? The Annas and Swamys will always exist for it is proof that we are a healthy democracy. And all of us has to learn to live it it. But to be swayed by the rancor of these obstructionist and perennial cynics is another. Governance is a tough job and this UPA government with all its shortcomings is doing a real good job, in the most transparent manner ever in the history of free India.
By
Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels
| 02 05 2012 16:33:26 +0000
Pro activeness of the Judiciary in executive matters is not a healthy sign for the democracy. It not only diminishes the authority of the executive but also chips away at the novelty of a judgement. In sync with Mr. Vinoy here. We have the division of work, as propounded by Henry Fayol, The great Mgt philosopher. Then why getting into somebody's shoes..
By
Peeyush Chauhan, BANKER, GOVT BANK
| 02 04 2012 15:59:47 +0000
Yes!The courts are going too far and over-reaching its jurisdiction over the last year or so. It will either compound the already existing executive paralysis or the executive will come out with all guns blazing and mark a period of conflict. With the Legislature already in a limbo this is the last of the scenarios that India will need. Hardly the situation conducive for pro-active action and initiative.
By
Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels
| 02 04 2012 05:59:12 +0000
In my personal view, the Hon'ble SC has overstepped its domain by cancelling the licenses and directing the Govt to make fresh allocations based on the auction route. The policy making is unarguably the subject of Govt's prerogative and as such, the judgement given by the Hon'ble SC suggests to be a case of judicial overreach.
By
Peeyush Chauhan, BANKER, GOVT BANK
| 02 03 2012 15:47:05 +0000
|
@Peeyush sir. Yes sir, I understand your logic. Sir, As you know the Courts follows specific procedures. They pronounce judgements after many hearings, cross checkings, going through evidences submitted etc. Basing on these evidences, they cant come to a generalised conclusion and extend their judgements to other areas which were not brought to their notice. For the purpose of understanding, I would like to cite a case in which the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh during 1980s made a legislation reducing the superannuation age of its employees from 58 to 55yrs. Thousands of its employees sent out of employment with this Govt. order. Some retired and some those aggrieved with the Govt. decision moved the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. After so many hearings, the High Court of A.P., pronounced its judgement directing the State Govt. to reinstate the employees duly paying them the arrears as well and restricted the benefits to those who moved the court. Other employees who obeyed the Govt. orders and retired from service were not given these benefits. If some one asks about the fate of employee who obeyed the Govt. orders, its upto the Govt. to take a decision and Court has nothing to do with. The same rule applies here also sir.
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 02 06 2012 08:28:53 +0000
Thanks for insight Vinoy.But I differ on this ,one appointed for a great cause cannot go in dilution mode so easily else no need for ministers IAS officers can alone dispense.Not to be 4rgtn the amounts involved in loss.
By
SUMEET DIKSHIT, Real Estate Transactions & Advisory, Real Estate
| 02 05 2012 17:19:56 +0000
Legally it was an overstepping it being a policy matter.Yet intervention was long due,else govt. would not have acted against it's minister. It would be better ig govt also bans any rise in tarrifs like it protected consumer's interest via mnp. If Chidambaran is not be fined/taken guilty for Raja's act why should common mam pay for those 2 idiots malafide deed.
By
SUMEET DIKSHIT, Real Estate Transactions & Advisory, Real Estate
| 02 04 2012 20:17:43 +0000
Sorry for contradicting Mr. Peeyush sir. When the Govt.is failing time and again in discharging its legitimate duties some mechanism shall be there to correct it. Proactive judiciary is trying to correct it. Let it. Its for the betterment of India's future.
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 02 04 2012 06:22:46 +0000
|