Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
 
Created by : Shahid Siddiqui, TV Producer, IBN18  | 10 05 2009 15:59:53 +0000
Industry : Radio, TV & FilmsFunctional Area : Politics(Personal Interests)
Keywords : india china tension
Activity:  415 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

How can New Delhi and Beijing achieve a steady state of equilibrium that gives both sides the comfort of predictability, and confidence in each other?

That’s a question nagging not just India’s foreign policy mandarins, but students and practitioners of diplomacy worldwide.

The India-China territorial dispute is a 4,056-km-long problem that stems from British expansionism in the early 20th century. Imperial Britain tried to push its line of control and carve buffer zones around the jewel in the crown. In 1913-1914, representatives of China, Tibet and Britain negotiated a treaty in India: the Simla Convention. Sir Henry McMahon, the foreign secretary of British India at the time, drew the 890 km McMahon Line as the border between British India and Tibet during the Simla Conference. The so-called McMahon Line, drawn primarily on the highest watershed principle, demarcated what had previously been unclaimed or undefined borders between Britain and Tibet. The McMahon line moved British control substantially northwards and became something the Chinese never accepted. Independent India inherited the dispute and despite Nehru’s bhai-bhai, a full-scale war erupted in 1962. China occupied the Switzerland-sized barren area of Aksai Chin in northeastern Ladakh and the PLA stomped into Arunachal Pradesh. Since then, the frontiers on both sides have simmered. Another war almost blew up in 1987. Agreements on maintaining peace were signed in 1993 and 1996 but frequent violations are reported. China occupies approximately 38,000 sq. km of Indian territory in J&K. In addition, under the so-called China-Pakistan “Boundary Agreement” of 1963, Pakistan ceded 5,180 sq. kms. of Indian territory in POK to China. Beijing claims approximately 90,000 sq. km of Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh and about 2000 sq. km. in the Middle Sector of the India-China boundary. Beijing does not recognise Arunachal Pradesh. The border has never been officially delimited and none of it features in the mountainous area marked on a map.

 
 Refer 106
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
By Defence Vs By Diplomacy
4
 
 
 
 
1
3
2
Support   Support
 
0
0

The answer lies in developing a strong defence force that can match up to China and robust economic growth that touches every part of the country.


By Priya Varadan, Independent consultant, Self employed  | 11 18 2009 09:03:30 +0000
0
1

China may attack India very similar to Pakistan does under these situation .

A chinese forum said such as :

India and China have some similarities in common, both of which have long standing civilization,playing increasingly main roles in recent international affairs.However, in recent years, there is some problems in the border, which makes strained relations in both of countries.
Do you have some ideas about the following topics? Discuss it.

1.China and India are competitors or partners?
2.Should China and India set aside the border dispute in order to develop bilateral relations?
3.Can China and India solve the border dispute in a peaceful way?
4.Is Sino-Indian relationship has a promising prospect?

A forum which you can find the similar threads and thread about Sino- China relations is here:
http://forum.globaltimes.cn/forum/showthread.php?t=8671

 


By Lily Allen, M.A student, WSJ  | 11 18 2009 06:44:19 +0000
0
0

In the global sphere, the story is somewhat different. Despite the pretence that the world is big enough to accommodate the rise of both India and China, the competition remains intense — over markets, construction orders, minerals, land banks.


By Shahid Siddiqui, TV Producer, IBN18  | 10 05 2009 15:59:53 +0000
0
0

don't jump to conclusions ... if and only if ..china attacks.. it will target  US.first .

already US is puncturing communist china through track three action oriented diplomacy by bleeding it by supporting one religious sect ..

US killed USSR( disintegrated) and a possibility that the same happens with china ..

becuse marx is not wrong in his opinion about religion that it's opium for the masses and a religiously dis/oriented person can not be rehabilitated..

 


By Ajay Ziz, Dy. Registrar,, University of Jammu  | 11 18 2009 07:19:29 +0000
0
0

brother shahid very easy ::

stop the music being played through the bagpipers of diplomacy & defence ::


By Ajay Ziz, Dy. Registrar,, University of Jammu  | 10 06 2009 07:30:17 +0000
Leading Recruitment firm
Leading Recruitment firm
Viewers also viewed
Is there a need of such statements at international level which might increase the tension...
 
2230 referals 27 arguments, 542 views
What changes in Indian political system would you like to see in 2011?
 
1168 referals 30 votes, 1053 views
China is selling Pakistan at least 36 advanced fighter jets in deal worth 1.4 billion dollars....
 
79 referals 25 arguments, 2201 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (4)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 107 views
Nirmal Baba is a fraud vs Nirmal Baba is a Saint
 
513 referals 6 arguments, 45 views
more...  
More From Author
This prefixing of religion and a holy color of a religion came in the backdrop of wide usage of another word Islamic terrorism, Jihadi terrorism, the words coined by American media and picked up world over. Surely these terminologies Islamic terrorism...
@ Mr. Manoj.....Lets not argue beyond the topic. Don't forget: Every debate is an opportunity to learn. Sometime Debating, make you learning. Nevertheless, debates often go wrong but should by easy to understand. That’s the second reason I use the...
?
more...