Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
 
Activity:  345 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000
 
 Refer 296
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
There should be a set of norms for change management Vs Management can change as and when they feel the need.
12
 
 
 
 
18
10
8
Support   Support
 
Top Argument
9
1

Vidyasagar, I think in this changing world it is difficult to develop a standard norms for an organization. It may be effective for few days and then it may not work. So it is always better to change according to the industry and keep growing along with the development. 

Thanks...


By Sheetal Jadhav, Sales/BD Manager, Future Group  04 13 2010 10:38:26 +0000
0
0

Vidya, As any sensible businessman or an alert employee can agree that change is the only constant thing on the earth not only in business but all walks of life. Considering the management functioning, the attitude & vision of the topmost decision making authority that really matters the most in smooth transition of the style of functioning. Any positive change that affects personal & professional development of employees, customer satisfaction & product improvement are generally welcomed but cost implications in the long run play a vital role in decision making. I would opine in a different manner,"In order to achieve smooth & pragmatic change in management any drastic/abrupt change proves to be fatal & to be weighed very cautiously by considering all financial implications.Because change is a slow process & most accidents can be avoidable at slow pace."


By suhaschandra deshpande, Marketing Associate  | 04 14 2010 12:56:31 +0000
0
0

As we all know that nothing is constant except changes but frequent changes is not always acceptable. In every management system, the employees needs to mould themselves to be accepted by the organization and work with free mind. This acceptability takes time which doesn't come in one go as different company has different management, systems and policy. So therefore a set of norms for change management should be there cope up with requirement as if the frequency will be high, the employees wont to be able to adjust themselves properly ultimately results in hamper of work, mind disturbance and it may even result in high attrition rate in the  organization.


By Javed Akhtar, Sr. Executive - Logistics, Keventer Agro Limited  | 04 14 2010 08:08:09 +0000
0
0

Change in policy is a huge exercise in terms of anticipated acceptance and defiance from the employees! It cannot be sudden. It has to be reasonably put forth with valid reasonings and the eventual outcome because of the change that needs implementation.

The bigger challenge is of implementing the change in policy. The work force, particularly in case of those governed by unions, will naturally put of slogans and strikes even before they really understand the meaning and then the reasoning for the change!!

There has to be a process and a SOP in place for such changes to be made effective and successful!!


By Makrand Bhave, Marketing & MICE, WIZCRAFT International  | 04 14 2010 07:37:02 +0000
0
0

It all depends upon the industry which is in the context...but the basic principle should be that all the concerned people  should be taken into confidence and all the angles should be deliberated before bringing in the change...all in all the management of the change should be looked into and it should be handled in a smooth and fairly manner to address the concerns of the involved parties....


By Hemant Shah, Freelancer, Freelancer  | 04 14 2010 07:05:20 +0000
0
0

All companies follow the old tradition of ZAMINDAR AND THE LABOUR. Where laborer never has a right. Recession taught all the working class that when it comes to survival of both it better be ME. We can debate on this and say IT IS NOT CORRECT.

It is simple when somebody joins a company it's 'your' company when its time to throw you are `just an employee'. And thus the reaction when its your company you put in efforts beyond, and when you are just an employee status is given to the same situation it becomes a chaos.    

Coming to the point - there should be a simple norm - keep everybody in the loop. When the time to change the management comes it becomes organized as everybody is aware of the situation. Hence less chaos or an organized chaos I would say.

 


By Ajay Bansal, Sales/BD Manager, Bennett, Coleman & Co. (The Times Of India Group)  | 04 14 2010 04:29:29 +0000
0
0

I think the reason is pretty obvious... our current management system has no work ethic!


By Gwen Rosario, M.E/M.Tech/MS student, University of Leeds  | 04 13 2010 15:09:26 +0000
0
0

Definately, there should be a set of norms for change management, other wise if it's changed as and when it will leads chaos & directionless.


By SACHIN SURAJMAL JAIN, Sales/BD Manager, TACO GROUP COMPANY  | 04 13 2010 14:39:41 +0000
0
0

actually where I'm working, here the changes are made by management without any study or justification & I know now, how that is affecting on our business, specially cash flow & movements of inventories.........but still I think, there sh'd be some norms for change....which may change as per time, changes in market, competition, & improved technology.... there a=may be some other factors too....but one thing is sure, ...workers can not fight against management, so the last decision will always be taken by them...


By Nandakishor Bharati, Production Manager, Dabaga Veg & Fruit Canning Co Ltd, Iringa (Tanzania)  | 04 13 2010 13:55:33 +0000
0
0
When a management wishes to change probably from a family business to a corporate culture there has to be some proper way in which it is brought about.Generally the older employees who have made the business successful are suddenly demoted or treated as unnoticed since they are resistant to the change.New and fresh employees are hired to either compel the older ones to leave and the efforts put in the past are suddenly forgotten.I personally do think that there has to be a set of norms to follow when such a step is taken.
By Vidyasagar Kulkarni, Sales/BD Manager,Techpak Industries Limited,Kenya  | 04 12 2010 13:23:20 +0000
0
0

Leadership is very crucial for managing change. It is the discretion of the leader that is always important to decide the course of action in a particular situation. A basic structure is definitely required to handle changes but it cannot be used as a one size fits all kinda thinking. As markets change, structures need to adapt to the changes.

That said, we need to look at various implementations of leadership. Sometimes leadership is vested in a group. In such situations we need to be careful about 'groupthink' wherein everybody thinks someone else will handle the change.

Hence it is important to periodically change the leadership group as well or introduce healthy opposition for the group. Again the success of all this depends on the ability of the leadership in understanding the situation and coming up with what is required to handle as well as checking the pulse.


By Vidyasagar Duvvuri, Head Teradata/Netezza/Greenplum DBA , Mahindra Satyam  | 04 14 2010 17:44:23 +0000
0
0

yup msheetal


By ARJUN SINGH NAMDHARI, Sales Executive, PepsiCo  | 04 14 2010 10:14:36 +0000
0
0

yup...i strongly agreed


By ARJUN SINGH NAMDHARI, Sales Executive, PepsiCo  | 04 14 2010 10:08:19 +0000
0
0

In today's fast moving world, it is impossible to have a standard norms for an organization.

As per the industry norms & going by the pace how the organization is performing, management can change as per the needs which should be driven across the entire organization.  The Management has to hand hold atleast the department heads regarding the same who needs to pass on the information to their respective teams.  Else, it would come as a surprise to a lot of people working in the organization.

 

 

 

 


By Rashmi , Category Manager, Indiaplaza.in (Formerly fabmall.com)  | 04 13 2010 15:56:13 +0000
0
0

I do agree that in todays changing world it is difficult to develop a standard norm , but it is the management to see how to take forward the business and accordingly have to develop norms and change it or amend it as per requirement.


By Narinder Bahga, General Manager ( NGC), Mother Dairy  | 04 13 2010 14:51:17 +0000
0
0

If the change is focused on growth or othewise seen benefical to the company's progress, then it needs to change when it's required. Being resistant to change is being resistant to progress. Look at India itself. If it hadnt changed, we'd be still riding carts or the ubiquitous Ambassador.


By David , Parts Manager, Ferrari/Maserati Spa and Bentley UK  | 04 13 2010 11:56:43 +0000
0
0

I agree with sheetal's statement and that is true, and temperory ways to rum the organisation will never work


By Sunil Pohani, Managing Director, G S EXIM  | 04 13 2010 11:19:50 +0000
Leading Recruitment Firm
Leading recruitment firm
Viewers also viewed
Recent Knowledge (5)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 107 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
I am associate of prajapati association and i am working for BJP from year 2005 to till date....
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 111 views
more...  
More From Author
I do agree.We as a community of human beings are runnning out of natural resourses.There are basic neccessities of food and water which need to be fullfilled.Technology and developments are great but keeping the environment in mind.Mr. Abdul Kalam the...
I do agree that to a certain extent television and print media play a vital role due to the reach in a short span of time.But looking at the number of MLM companies in India and the success rate at which they grew other ways of promotion do play an...
more...