It should be long term. Short-term policies are popular because they are generally more cost-effective than long-term policies. But a company need long term policy to be successful......
By
pooja trivedy, HR Executive, Hewitt08 09 2010 10:43:16 +0000
COMPANY REMAINS ALIVE ..VIA MONEY AND DEDICATED PROS WHO CAN KEEP IT ALIVE ..real mission & vision is not there on a piece of paper or sign post ! By
Ajay Ziz, Dy. Registrar,, University of Jammu
| 08 16 2010 06:24:27 +0000
In any growth oriented organization, the objectives and goals of all functions - sales, marketing, finance etc are aligned with the vision & mission of the organization. While vision is strategic in its perspective, mission tends to be mid / short term and hence, in a sense, more operational & tactical.Policies, similarly, have a long term perspective since they are formulated to support in running the organization through its entire journey. The same applies to HR as a function - it must have long term policies. Policies are also an important part of the organizations culture and values DNA. However,policies can be reviewed and changed if their implications are long term.
By
Lt Col Sumant Govind Khare, CEO/MD/Director, Nvision Learning and Development
| 08 16 2010 05:46:24 +0000
Long term is basically with the investment on Capital ie.strategies and Short term policies are based on some tactics, which are concerned about day to day affairs and personal debates.
By
Paul Sureshkumar, Manager, Selvan Marketing
| 08 12 2010 09:28:29 +0000
Short term policy decisions are nothing but adhoc decisions fitting to the situation. Organisations shall have long term strategies/policies. Unless, the Short term policies bridged on the lines of long term policy decisions, it amounts to distractions and dilutes the long term goals.
You can see what is near you and act wise.Long term policies you dont know what is in store.Thinking longterm also makes you comitted ,responsible,and confident.
hr policy should be the way of long term if it will take shortem also beneficial By
mula santhoshreddy, HR Executive, MINDS INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS
| 08 09 2010 12:44:49 +0000
I do endorse Pooja's view as H.R . Policy decisions are in purview of more than a year & any process itself qualifies as long term if it is more than a year. By
SANKALP BAJPAI, MBA/PGDM student, BITM
| 08 09 2010 12:08:07 +0000
Complex relationships amongst competing variables need to be objectively considered in the process of selecting policy alternatives. At times, what appears to be a reasonable decision to make savings in budgetary proposals can have unforseen personnel and training cosequences. In the light of the ultra dynamic corporate scenario obtaining, are long term policy decisions still relevant ? or is there a case for short term decisions ? By
Brigadier (Retd) Sunil Chadha,, Nil
| 08 08 2010 06:58:30 +0000
How long is long-term? I'd say that this is directly related to the turnover of the sector of industry being considered. In India, the sectors of Banking, Defence, Manufacturing, etc. are low-turnover. Therefore, there can be long-term policies.
However, the IT sector is a medium-turnover sector while the ITES/BPO sector is a high-turnover sector. These cannot depend on long-term policies. There MUST be effective short-term policies that can leverage human resources during the period of employment - based on prevalent market conditions.
By
Isaac Madhavan, R & D Manager, Test prep company
| 11 14 2010 21:34:15 +0000
a company needs dyanamically fluidic changing by the moments policies .. no rigidity !!flexibility is the need of the hour !! By
Ajay Ziz, Dy. Registrar,, University of Jammu
| 08 09 2010 10:55:05 +0000
GK Consulting are a team of Human Resource Management Professionals engaged in Executive Search / Head – hunting, predominantly for IT, ITES, FMCG, Banking, Insurance, Media, and Oil & Gas Sectors with clear focus on quality& professionalism with a personalized approach.
it would be in our national interest to work with a peaceful neighbourhood. seen as neighbour we need to think one way. seen as a belligerent neighbour the scene changes somewhat. seen as an adversary the window opens to whole new set of options....
nice and exhaustive article sharmaji. presence in gwadar also enhances the capability of other sino assets operating in the indian ocean region - a fact already brought out in your article. the strategic implications would surely be global and will in...
thanks sharma sir, as always a well thought out and well expressed analysis. one doesn't go for a military option without clarity of the end state. unless we can define what we plan to achieve by an armed response, we may find ourselves floundering....