Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
Posted in Community :

HR Professionals

 

In which organization steady and healthy growth are more efficient ?

Created by : Mansuri Hamid, Mananger, L & T Power Limited ( Larsen & Toubro)  | 02 09 2011 10:30:09 +0000
Keywords : in which organization steady and healthy growth are more efficient ?
Activity:  309 views;  last activity : 03 03 2011 05:51:02 +0000
 
 Refer 1509
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Family Organization Vs Non Family Organization
5
 
 
 
 
13
3
10
Support   Support
Top Argument
4
0
Family organizations work equally good and at times better. We get freedom to do things here as well and to add to it we get the trust of the family which is a crucial part in one's progress. The point here is not that is it about family or non family organizations. It more about an individual who is working.
By Gargi Sinha, Senior Consultant, Hewitt Associates  02 12 2011 07:03:51 +0000
 
Top Argument
4
0

In Non family organization, there is much freedom and right to do thing in systematics and formating systems than family Organization. And good mentor benefits always be available with Non Family Organization. 
By Mansuri Hamid, Mananger, L & T Power Limited ( Larsen & Toubro)  02 09 2011 10:37:18 +0000
0
0
Hi Gargi! Well we all kow that family organizations are more growthfull than non- Family. You can review the Past history like Bidla group, Tata Group, Reliance and many more.. Actually Family organizations make a brand and follow some traditional ways to find there custumers by inheriting generations...
By Bhavesh , Trainer, Network Bulls Infotech  | 02 14 2011 14:31:53 +0000
0
0

gargi I am in total agreement with you. If you really go back to the past you will find the family run organisations has worked much better than others.

Today the scenario is changing still family run organisations are working probably better than others. 
By Rathin Deb, Freelance Retail Consultant  | 02 12 2011 18:27:38 +0000
0
0

Natteraja I agree with you.
By Rathin Deb, Freelance Retail Consultant  | 03 03 2011 05:51:01 +0000
0
0

dear Mansuri , i am totally agree with you....
By abhishek vaish, Merchandiser, SKIER  | 03 02 2011 05:31:07 +0000
1
0

In my opinion both organizations have steady and healthy growth. However, the organizations run by families have little bit more centralization of power in the hands of the family members and consequently the managers have to await nod from them even for routine matters to execute.Here there is no misuse of powers by managers and more dependency of employees on their immediate bosses/supervisors.

In non family organizations, there is little bit better decentralization of powers and responsibilities to the managers and sometimes it leads to misuse of powers by managers.Further this type of organizations facilitate better carrier developments for the right candidates.

By and large both organizations have its own merits & demerits.Ultimately, the equation is between what we contribute to the organization and in turn what we get from the organizations.

Thanks for the referral Ms.Gargi Sinha.
By NATTERAJA R. ARIKRISHNAN, GM-Projects, Bentec Electricals & Electronics Pvt. Ltd  | 03 01 2011 16:41:52 +0000
0
0
Because in a non-family one, there are more chances of a professional set-up while the family one will have only chamchas and their chohorts rising up the ladder. Also in a family oriented organisation, decision making is at the whims and fancies of an individual while in the latter it can be routed through a committee etc.
By Jaygopal Raghavan, Marketing Manager, Landmark Group  | 02 23 2011 16:21:59 +0000
0
0
Family organisations are highly propereitary, works for one individual. The owners functions based on their intuition and level of competancy. It totally depends on his vision and with vested interests. Success will be his and failures will be attributed to the next level. In non-family organisation at least a set of professionals decides on the action, the business per se will be the subject, than individuals whims.
By G Thiruvenkatachari, Head of HR, HCK Group of Companies  | 02 21 2011 04:13:29 +0000
0
0

You are right, Mr. Mansuri.

I support your views.
By SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd  | 02 14 2011 06:25:39 +0000
0
0
hello Gargi,i don't support Non Family Orgainisation as there will more stake holders with different mindsets and opinions.
By jairaj shyam prasad, Production Manager, BOSCH Ltd  | 02 12 2011 16:25:20 +0000
1
0
family organizations seldom show proper professionalism. The probability of finding steady healthy growth is higher as in a non-family organization (hopefully) the distracting aspects family relationships is not present.
By RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants  | 02 12 2011 13:06:04 +0000
0
0
It is always Non family organization;where you expect deliverance and professionalism;whereas it is generally lacking in family organization.
By kasturirangan.r , INSURANCE ADVISOR, Life Insurance Corporation Of India  | 02 12 2011 12:53:06 +0000
Argue for "Family Organization"
Argue for "Non Family Organization"
 Found the debate "In which organization steady and healthy growth are more efficient ?"  interesting ?  Suggest to your connections and communities  
 
Viewers also viewed
 
227 referals 12 votes, 421 views
Should men get Paternity Leave vs Men do not need Paternity Leave
 
2038 referals 24 arguments, 416 views
Intrapreneurship is now hot topic, organizations are hitting hard on it. A change in culture is...
 
498 referals 5 votes, 801 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (4)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 107 views
I am associate of prajapati association and i am working for BJP from year 2005 to till date....
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 120 views
Nirmal Baba is a fraud vs Nirmal Baba is a Saint
 
513 referals 6 arguments, 45 views
more...  
Sponsored Jobs
More From Author
Sincerely, i feel that to spend 6 hours to watch cricket in working days rather than holiday is not really worth. Because cricket not been same as it was before. Now a days it becomes key source of business to earn money for ICC,BCCI, Politician &...
more...