Esha Johar ji I am too for equity as in long term investor you get fabulous return,provided there is introspection by the Managers to the Public issue,while placing the equity share on premium,the number of times the face value the dividend also should be accordingly paid out.As earlier under the Controller of Capital Issues the 70's to nintees.After that nse and bse in Demat format,the very concept of Primary Issues has gone see change,but in the process the entire stock exchange other than Bse got a beating. And frequent scam from Harshad Mehta.I am apprehensive the bubble may burst as most of the equity shares are overpriced.
By
kasturirangan.r , INSURANCE ADVISOR, Life Insurance Corporation Of India
| 01 26 2011 12:36:49 +0000
definitely equity is meant for risk takers only not for people who want to make investment being very conservation...but higher the risk higher the returns. one should invest into equities but carefully and go for long term investments
By
Jasmin Pawar, HR Manager, HR GLOBE CONSULTING
| 01 26 2011 03:10:15 +0000
Investment should be according to our need. I would prefer Stock over bond. Investment in bond means losing our money as the interest gained by investment in these instruments not even surpasses the inflation rate in the market. However, it's true that risk associated in stock markets is very high but the more risk you will take the more return you will gain is also true. In these times when inflation is on the hike I personally feel that investment in bonds is a total loss. These days investors are willing to bear great short term risks associated with equities as compared with bonds as they know equities will eventually outperform bonds over the long run but the risk doesn't disappear over time. A further dimension arises when the investor must balance long-term goals with short-term concerns. Greater short term risks are veiwed as the better long term returns. Equity portfolio is virtually ceertain to outperform any fixed income investment over a long enough period.
By
shailesh , B.B.A student, kumaun university, ssj campus almora
| 01 26 2011 02:42:57 +0000
No, Equity is not riskier than bonds because as you seen the scenario of indian economy last decades the interest rate were fluctuated which directly related to bond. As you have amount of money and if you want invest for long term and relax about the remaining life you should be invest in equity because i believe that whatever fluctuations are going on market still it's give return of approx 15% to 17% so i think equity is better option for long term investment.
By
Ankit Gandhi, MBA student, Omegan School of Business
| 08 04 2009 07:40:52 +0000
OFCOURSE EQUITY,since it is based on share market and there are always fluctuations in share market but in the long run there is more benefit than bonds, if a person can take risk should opt for equity and those who are affraid of taking any risk opt bonds
By
SB DIKSHIT, STATE QUALITY MONITOR, U.P.R.R.D.A
| 08 04 2009 04:56:33 +0000
People should play safe and meanwhile earn handsomely so there has to be balance between both of them. I feel to diversify portfolio in such a way that one can hedgge position over other so to gin more from equity one should invest some amount in bonds but allocation should be more toward equity as that will increase risk apetite of person, as he has already invested some amount in safe holding.
By
Abhay Dodiya, B.Com. M.B.A.(Fin.)
| 05 28 2009 04:55:28 +0000
Economies that support investments in Bonds and stocks and all types of other assets like, precious metals, ETF's, RIET's, Mutual funds, livestock, commodities etc; are called 'asset economies'. People in such economies do investments in such assets for imporving their future consumption needs or so to say to improve their endowments. Bond prices and interest rates move in opposite directions because when prices come down it is highly riky to invest in bonds and when it goes up it is less risky environment to invest.
By
Mathew Cherian, Research Associate/Analyst, Western Michigan University
| 05 13 2009 06:59:08 +0000
I shall put it in a different perspective that of Risk. Suppose one has the opportunity of gaining 15% on an investment or getting your investment back and the second option of gaining 20% on your investment or loosing all your investment you can get. One who chooses the first option is called the 'risk averse' investor or the bond investor and the second type is called the stock investor. In stock investment you may not have to forfeit all your investment one might make it if one is a careful investor. Only extreme risk takers or unprecedent events knock off your investment to zero.
By
Mathew Cherian, Research Associate/Analyst, Western Michigan University
| 05 11 2009 17:27:35 +0000
Dear Suchita and Jyoti, Fixed return securities viz bonds etc are more linked to risk in these volatile time where we see seesaw movements in inflation as well as in market interest rate. Returns on bond is combination of face value of security and coupon rate attached to security. When interest rate goes higher side the bond face value goes southward and vice-versa and due to this we can see negative returns in bond market also, beside this Inflation nos also play there part in bond returns and in actual terms they can hamper the positive returns of bonds and turn them to –ve (Discounting of inflation nos to bond return nos)
By
Dushyant Hada, Territory Manager
| 05 11 2009 11:22:33 +0000
I agree that it totally depends upon the risk appetite of the investor. though bond has less risk compared to equity, but still equity is the best investment avenue. the chances of recovery of loss is much higher in equity than bonds. we have to be very selective while choosing both, bonds as well as equity. Equity is riskier in short term but if we are investing it for a period say 4-5 years then it is the safest bet 1 can have with a considerable return much higher than bonds. In the current market there were few liquid funds which gave a negative return, and a loss from it has not yet required. but in equity it is recovering.
By
Sumeet Phalak, Mutual Fund Analyst, Jain Investment
| 05 11 2009 08:52:08 +0000
The percentage allocation of investment into equity and bond will depend on the risk appetite and age of the investor. A higher allocation of equity may be desirable for young and for higher returns in long term. A certain percentage of bond/debt instruments may help the investor in a bear phase like the one we are witnessing since 2008.
By
Upendra Pratap Singh, Head/VP/GM-R&D, SAIL,Bokaro Steel Plant
| 05 10 2009 14:51:21 +0000
Equity is more risky to bond, as well as bond also more risky than equity, all its depend on Inflation and tenure of investment.
By
Dushyant Hada, Territory Manager
| 05 09 2009 10:01:10 +0000
Bonds are less risk than stocks. When you look at the risk vs return of both stocks returns more than bonds. That tells the whole story more risk you take on ste ocks more return you demand from it. Corporate bonds yield close to 15% per annum where as equity can go 20% or above dividend yield + capital gains yield. So stocks are riskier.
By
Mathew Cherian, Research Associate/Analyst, Western Michigan University
| 05 08 2009 17:46:11 +0000
|
I never cease to be amazed by people who simply say that we cannot enter into this instrument or that because it is too risky. The investment in any instrument be it bond or equity depends upon the investment objectives of an individual/ institution. The investment objective in turn are a function of number of factors like the risk/return objectives, the liquidity needs, the time horizon, the tax considerations, the legal and regulatory requirements and unique needs and considerations. Also, if we look at an instrument in isolation, that instrument may have a lot of risk. That way, equity does posses more risk because in the event of default of a company, the equity holders are the last to be paid. And the debt holders have the first right on the assets of the company. However, because the equity holders take this risk, they enjoy more returns as the debt holders have no share in profits of the company. However, if we look at the equity in the context of the investment portfolio, it suddenly does not remain so risky. Also the famous saying that one should avoid putting all the eggs in the same basket. If we have our investments in around 12 different companies then this risk is diversified more than 90%
By
Noor Aftab, Director Finance, Shahina Aftab Foundation
| 12 01 2009 08:33:11 +0000
Reward is always associated with risks, but not guaranteed. Risk may lead to very high return - that return may be a profit or a loss. In this light, bonds are the best options like fixed deposits, but tradeable. They give natural returns with better liquidity and better safety. Mutual fund investments in bond funds are always better.
By
taranath joshi, DGM Operations, EOL,
| 08 03 2009 17:14:48 +0000
bonds are rsiky because if you do not want to hold it till maturity and want to sell in the market,there is hardly any retail market.you do not have a exit. they depend on the interest rate..if the interest rate fall the bonds prices rise.and if the interest rate take a up turn the bond prices tank. if the performance of the company improves and the stock market are in good mood there is a chance of the prices of the equity improving and you recovering your cost and make profit.the same flexibility is not there in bonds.
By
sandesh saboo, Research Associate/Analyst, saboo associates
| 07 15 2009 11:36:57 +0000
Equity is more risky, but is more rewarding in the long run. I agree with suchita madam, the allocation should be based on the time horizon and risk appetite of the investor. The major risk associated with bonds is interest rate risk.
By
Padmanabhan R, Articled / Audit assistant, Finance student
| 07 14 2009 19:02:09 +0000
i support her view,i would ask her to broaden her investment ideas beyond equity and bond..the other assest class like ,jwellery,real estate,metals,art.other fixed assests.and other class of investment should also be looked at. fixed deposits,chit funds,bank deposits..land..diamonds..you have to keep in view how well you can manage your assests.have a wholesitic view..
By
sandesh saboo, Research Associate/Analyst, saboo associates
| 07 14 2009 18:40:50 +0000
Hello Jyoti, bonds are riskier than equity because if there is a loss in it it cannot be recovered but it is the opposite in case of equity, atlest there are chances of recovering the loss in equity. If we see, the volatility in the bond market was much higher than that of equity. But if it is the case of government bonds then there is no risk at all. No risk no returns.
By
Sumeet Phalak, Mutual Fund Analyst, Jain Investment
| 05 11 2009 08:58:38 +0000
Hello! Dushyant I want to know that how could bond is more risker than equity? I m not able to understand the concept.As far I know that equity is directly linked with mkt, whereas bonds are not directly link with mkt. So equity is mkt sensitive while bonds are unaffected a lot by mkt swings. Bonds offer more security as issued mostly by government and offer a fixed rate of interest in these turbulent times it is better to invest in bonds than equity Will you put some more light on "bond is more risker than equity" which could be beneficial for me.
By
Jyoti Rath, Sr. Associate, Barclays
| 05 11 2009 06:03:50 +0000
|