tendulkar alwys pls 4 hmslf nt 4 indian team...so he nvr bcms just like gavaskar...
By
Mani Singh, B.Com student, delhi univercity
| 07 02 2012 08:36:10 +0000
tendulkar alwys pls 4 hmslf nt 4 indian team...so he nvr bcms just like gavaskar...
By
Mani Singh, B.Com student, delhi univercity
| 07 02 2012 08:34:17 +0000
tendulkar alwys pls 4 hmslf...so he nvr bcms just like gavaskar...
By
Mani Singh, B.Com student, delhi univercity
| 07 02 2012 08:33:31 +0000
I agree wd gavaskar
By
Mani Singh, B.Com student, delhi univercity
| 07 02 2012 08:28:53 +0000
I agree with Ms Devi Kaladeen.Y compare make one feel depressed and raise more controversies.people who were legends where legends at a time when they where playing or doing something.I dont think there is any comparison to be made at all.
By
Rajendran Mariagnanam Mariagnanam, Founder and managing partner, Braintrain consultancy services LLP
| 06 18 2012 03:08:26 +0000
It is a fallacy to compare players of different eras.
By
Vinoy Scaria James, Tour Consultant., Guiders Mission Tours & Travels
| 06 17 2012 01:28:41 +0000
he is the man with dedication and got all his records..
By
manoj kumar p, B.Tech/B.E. student, ssmist
| 06 15 2012 03:22:21 +0000
I agree
By
Akhilesh Jha, Team Leader -(Technical), BSL
| 06 14 2012 18:50:25 +0000
I agree
By
Akhilesh Jha, Team Leader -(Technical), BSL
| 06 14 2012 18:50:12 +0000
I agree
By
Akhilesh Jha, Team Leader -(Technical), BSL
| 06 14 2012 18:49:48 +0000
He came to the sport, when it was not as popular in India, and also Indians were dominated worldwide. He dominated the most "attacking" and "accomplished" bowling attack of the era, the West Indies team. If we compare, Tendulkar dominatd but not the best attack in the world, he dominated in bits and pieces.
By
Akhilesh Jha, Team Leader -(Technical), BSL
| 06 14 2012 18:49:12 +0000
My vote for you Deviji..
By
Suryanarayan Murthy, Free lancer
| 02 22 2011 05:36:20 +0000
No comparison should be made between these who talented cricketer.Sunil Gavaskar is now 62 years old while Sachin is 37 years old which means that they played the game of cricket in two different eras.No one must forget that Sunil in his time dominated Indian cricket and was the first batsman to score 10,000 runs in test.And who says Gavaskar was not an entertaining cricketer...do some research please.
By
Devi Kaladeen, Audit Manager, Health Sector Development Unit
| 02 22 2011 02:17:12 +0000
Surely it depends who's paying!
By
John Evans, Expert, Professional Networking
| 02 21 2011 12:55:52 +0000
Gavaskar because he played against a formidable line up of top rate fast bowlers like Joel Garner, Andy Roberts, Mike Holding, Lillie, Thompson, Imran Khan, Bob Willis, Malcom Marshall-the list is endless. He did not even wear protective gear and had no past role models to guide him. He brought pride and agression to Indian cricket.
By
Vipin Labroo, Freelancer, Advertising/PR/MR/Events
| 02 20 2011 10:58:38 +0000
|
Both are best in their time..! No-one could compare..! We can say both are best, but Tendulkar is more lucky!!
By
Satwinder Singh, Program Manager, Confidential
| 10 22 2012 11:48:37 +0000
No Gavaskar wa not even half as good as Tendulkar..One can match there records gavaskar performance in the one dayers was poor even by the standards of ODI cricket played at that time not to forget his infamous innings of 36 not out in the 60 overs match.He had scored just one century in one day cricket(Compared to sachin who is know one short of a century of century) that too in the last match which he played of his career that chance too was given by Kapil Dev the then captain of India,during whoese tenure as captain he(gavaskar) never supported him and played politics behind his back. He was only a selfish test player who only played for the sake of records. If there was T20 cricket played at that time we would also have noticed the slowest and lowest strike rates in that form too.
By
Rahul Kumar Rai, I.T Consultant, Bennett, Coleman & Co. (The Times Of India Group)
| 03 23 2011 11:55:12 +0000
Definitely it is Sachin. Though Gavaskar played the game well in a deifferent era, he was a selfish lout hogging the crease for his personal development. And dont forget hsi one point agenda which was to give players from bombay the maximum exposure. On the personal front too he wasnt a saint, he has the history of spoiling the careers of a lot of young cricketers. Not only that but also captains. It is history that he ensured venkatraghavan's downfall when the former became the captain for a brief while. As for entertaining i would rate Gundappa as a better entertainer than gavaskar. And Rathin, it is false to state that gavaskar played without a helmet, if you recollect his cap had a skull lining and not a simple hat as it looked. Besides all this Sachin is a much better player and a gentleman too both on and off the field. He is humble and helpful towards all aspiring cricketers too which makes him a much better human being.
By
Jaygopal Raghavan, Marketing Manager, Landmark Group
| 03 07 2011 15:48:29 +0000
Yash I agree with you since both are players of different era. At the same time I appreciate Gagasker for playing against those lethal bowlers of West Indies and Australia without helmet.
By
Rathin Deb, Advisor and retail consultant, currently as Branch Manager, Tower Infotech Ltd
| 02 23 2011 07:00:19 +0000
I think it is not good to compare both of them. In that time Gavaskar was key person for India & Now Tendulkar. Both of great in there carrer time. Tendulkar is more aggresive than Gavaskar.
By
Omkar Kulkarni, Accounts Officer, Minilec(India) Pvt Ltd
| 02 21 2011 14:46:07 +0000
Surely it depends who's paying!
By
John Evans, Expert, Professional Networking
| 02 21 2011 12:55:56 +0000
|
