Look ... most of us like things Private . When danger is emminent, we turn to Govt. for help. When things run on merry mood, we like : ----- Free enterprise, free economy, free market, free Press etc ----- Look on Govt. as root of all evils - like to de-control everything except Military ------Like to belittle Parliament ( and their occupants ) which is deemed to be one of the pillars of democracy ... like Press Remedy : Formation of a "Regulatory Body" to oversee affairs of media is the need of the day. There existis : Press Council of India. Till such body is formed with representatives of all stakeholders, Media should impose a 'self-control'. Otherwise much damage will be done to the credibility of medai ( special attention : Hindi and Local language media ) in its latest form.
By
ASOKE KUSARI, Domestic Private Banking-Executive/Manager, A large leading PSU Bank - India
| 06 18 2010 15:26:56 +0000
quite rightly said though you belong to media, but media should present things without mirch - masala.
By
puneet , Manager Admin
| 05 19 2010 17:32:52 +0000
Yes! It needs control at least for few days through a regulatory body.
By
Santosh Kumar Mohanty, Civil Engineer-Municipal, Sambalpur University
| 05 16 2010 16:58:25 +0000
I think Sulagna is correct in her observations. The other side 26/11 the handelers were instructing the terrorists on seeing the Television. Though there should be a free press in democracy but at the same trime in case of any wrong news the Government should make it mandatory to question and the same to be answered and the details should be published. It doesent mean our press give us only wrong or incorrect news but they try their level best to provide the most accurate news. The exception may be there are a lot of New News Agencies has come up and in order to sell they may at times commit such things.
By
Rathin Deb, Advisor and retail consultant, currently as Branch Manager, Tower Infotech Ltd
| 05 12 2010 09:09:22 +0000
MEDIA MUST BE MONITORED ! The Media of our country have been given enough Freedom... which has not been sensibly used... Rather it has been Misused. We, the Viewers have to bear the brunt of utterly senseless & baseless BREAKING NEWS... which do Nothing but Break our Heads. There has to be a SENSIBLE REGULATORY BODY, which can Control Media or at least Keep a Check. Happy Debating Friends !
By
Naushad H.L., Creative Director, MAD COMMUNICATION
| 05 12 2010 08:22:05 +0000
yes, there should not be a media trial.
By
santosh p gawande, regional sales manager, sansui electronic pvt.ltd.
| 05 12 2010 07:59:22 +0000
In a democracy, there is "complete freedom" to publish news. Sometimes, it may not be in the "public-interest" to have that published. As a "free" paper, editors are expected to voluntarily refrain from publishing these items. If there is a uniformly agreed code of conduct, may be all papers may also voluntarily fall in line. This is "true" democracy. Sometimes editors forget this and try to "scoop". This is where the Government tries to step in. As was later reported in the 26/11 case, most of the information guidance to the terrorists holed up were being given to them by their controllers based on the TV coverage. May be with les of TV coverage, the battle would have lasted much shorter.
By
V. Srinivas, Freelancer, Information Technology
| 05 12 2010 05:16:20 +0000
HI Sulagna, thank you for inviting me to this discussion. Media being the voice of the public should be allowed freedom but of late, especially the broadcast variety is trying to thrust their views on to the public rather than delivering news. Some tries to influence the opinion of people consciously which is not expected. Yes media news should be controlled by the government to ensure the quality of news (i think some type of board already exists for this, although i am not too sure) but media actions should be curbed to some limit, as they do not seem to use their power judiciously.
By
Satadru Shastri, Partner, Mukherjee & Shastri
| 05 12 2010 05:09:37 +0000
NO
By
TARAK NATH SAIN, Civil Engineer-Other, ALSTOM PROJECT INDIA LTD
| 05 12 2010 02:49:54 +0000
Yes, govt has to put some control on media while delivering the message to the public through media. We had noticed so many times where the media would focus mostly on those area where it is less focus is required although they highlight the news with repeated and in depth explanation on the same for longer time. Media is the best system where every one will act on the issue, if one good news was came out of the media it would be help full for the public to know about the out come of the message, ex , I remember one news recently about a village where they were encouraging plantation on a birth of each girl in their house premises which produces a very good message to the public with that they can motivate and improvise the things accordingly..
By
Venkatesham.G , Purchase/Vendor Development Manager, Radico Khaitan Ltd.
| 05 12 2010 01:54:50 +0000
i endorse your view without any reservation. Of late most of the news are based on LAW OF ASSUMPTION AND A CHECK ON THE NEWS IS A MUST. THE RIGHT EXAMPLE IS OUR GENERAL ELECTION WHERE THEY PREDICTED THEIR OWN THEORY BASED ON SURVEY CONDUCTED ONLY IN METROS AND NOT TIRE TWO OR TIRE THREE CITIES.. AND EVEN T.V IS NO EXCEPTIONAL
By
sudhakar , BUSINESS CONSULTANT
| 05 11 2010 15:07:53 +0000
Media is an important medium for dissemination of information to the public. However, many times in their zeal to give accurate information, sometimes the information is not fully appropriate. This may lead to confusion. In order to avoid these issues, appropriate controls should be put in place by the government. This will try to ensure proper dissemination of information to the public by the media agencies.
By
Badri N Srinivasan, Head - Quality, Valtech India Systems Pvt. Ltd.
| 05 11 2010 13:57:16 +0000
Now a days I do not see news, every news channel has their own views. Some times I feel like that what is the difference between a news channel and entertainment channel. In my opinion, NEWS channel should be separated from views channel, because many people doesn't realize it is their view rather than the news. I remember during DD days that I use to hear only the news not the cooked up news. In the name of free speech, they are spicing the news like crazy. It should be stopped.
By
Srinivasa Varrey, Sr Architect, Peak Technologies
| 05 11 2010 13:29:50 +0000
because they media is more busy in making money...........
By
HEMANT VERMA, Marketing and Branding, NAVNEET PUBLICATION INDIA LTD.
| 05 11 2010 12:04:41 +0000
Dear Mr Prabhakar Rao, And who would stop this regulator from censoring as per whims and fancies.
By
Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India
| 05 11 2010 11:45:58 +0000
Then in that case there should be standard centeral government run news channel,private news channels may not be ale to be regulated, they market themseleves making news, once cannot run behind every news in every news channel that is telecast.
By
Mohammed Sadique, Project Manager - PMP- TOYOTA Application Support (AS/400 Tech), Abdul Lateef Jameel -TOYOTA
| 05 11 2010 11:22:58 +0000
in my opinion they are showing according to their views instead of following people opnion
By
srinivasarao makkena, M.E/M.Tech/MS student, university of ballarat
| 05 11 2010 10:16:49 +0000
|
No government is already corrupted if they got control of media then they will do anything whatever they want means the common Indian will not be aware about any fact. Actually government is now ruling by the politician and how the politician are every one knows. So in some cases media need pressure what they should and what they should not but it should not be by govt we also can also control this by opposing their news.
By
Manmath Patil, Marketing executive
| 06 18 2010 14:26:45 +0000
In any country media has to be free so that actual news reaches pulic. Also if govt puts pressure or controls media then we will never know exactly what govt is doing as they will only have to show the good picture, what about other side of coin?? Its about media realizing their duties and working on bringing up the actual picture... TRPs will follow.
By
Vineet Thakkar, Associate Executive- Product Marketing, Aris Global
| 05 16 2010 18:59:39 +0000
No the government control will lead to govt. controlling media for it's own use. But for sure there should be some governing body which should be given power to monitor the behavior of media. This should be a tiger with teeth.
By
Sharad Tiwari, G. M. Marketing, News Today
| 05 13 2010 06:24:36 +0000
Dear Makrand, Now which statement of mine made you get the attributed idea. What I have conveyed is "Press must act more responsibly and ensure that it can contribute as positive watchdog for Government inactions and not the other way round". Citizens on their part can appreciate or reject a media for quality efficiency or otherwise as the case may be. How can a government that may be struggling to cover their own set of inactions, seen partisan in conduct, be expectedly objective in assessing the media.
By
Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India
| 05 12 2010 07:50:36 +0000
Dear Sulagna, One's irresponsibility is not automatically completed with others responsibility.VV More responsible people are required in media and that is the only solution. Else whatever of democracy is remaining may as well be lost.
By
Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India
| 05 12 2010 07:35:50 +0000
Prabhakar I agree completely!1 Ravindra... It is indirectly telling me that you as a ctizen also need to be governed to express yourself by the government!! :) Media, particularly the press, has the FREEDOM OF SPEECH for which they are entitled under the democratic laws of our country. At most a regulatory body to supervise content etc could be instilled to govern their actions. Beyond that you may as well ask the government to zip your lip and be happy with a King ruling you!!
By
Makrand Bhave, AGM - Corporate Business, E18, part of Network 18 Group
| 05 12 2010 07:05:02 +0000
I totally agree with Mr Rao on this. There should be some independent body which can regulate this media for its content and objectivity may be like censor board or SEBI.. Currently even there are lots of media channels which favour some or the other political parties. I think this is the moral responsibility of Media as well that they should provide the correct information to the public without any biasing and to get the TRP. There are lots of channels currently airing which don’t have the content to show but because to get the TRP these people are playing with the emotions of the public. If there will be a cap on media by the Government then media will not be able to open up the sensitive issues and the cases which got diluted somewhere because of Government only. This will be good that media should continue independently with a check from some independent body and media should also understand their ethics, moral principle and responsibilities before showing any content.
By
Romil Jain, Technical Analyst, Satyam Computer Services
| 05 12 2010 03:58:22 +0000
In general, i am opposed to any kind of govt involvement in media. That is one institution which byd efinition, in theory and in practice, must be free. Having said that, we must also point out that media in India, particularly the TV news variety are highly irresponsible. They practice the expose type of journalism to a faul;t by elevating every single thing to a high paced drama.
By
RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants
| 05 12 2010 03:21:55 +0000
There should not be any curb on freedom of expression. Media should be free to report on most topics and news, albeit there should be some norms so that unnecessary hype could be controlled and news reports endangering national security could be disallowed. People should be educated by some Government agency on not wasting their precious time in viewing frivolous and trivial news items.
By
akshaya bhatia, Experienced IT plus Management Professional
| 05 11 2010 17:53:47 +0000
I support Mr. Rao. An autonomous body, much like SEBI, is required to monitor these blokes. Also, the monetary aspect, i.e., who is giving and how much is given and why it is given must be kept track of made known to the public. Especially funds from abroad. There should also be a rule that the same news item should not be repeated more than 4 times in a single day. Also, the number of hours spent on discussing the same news item must be restricted. This would make the channels focus on more news rather than a single "News of the Day" which is repeated again and again. There must also be some control on "Trail by Media".
By
G A Narayan, VP - Marketing, KE Housing P. Ltd.
| 05 11 2010 17:32:27 +0000
They should be free but only thing they should know the seriousness of the issue and should not try to overdo things to get the TRP, if they know and understand their responsibility then every thing is ok.
By
B.Mehernath , Marketing & Technical Head, Bondit Construction Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
| 05 11 2010 15:58:35 +0000
Hi Sulagna, thanks to have invited me in this discussion. Unlukily, I've to disagree with your opinion: also if there are issues as a matter of fact, a clear trend for more independent media is needed. To the sake of individual autonomy and collective well being My 2 cents
By
domenico fama, HR Business Parner, international Bank
| 05 11 2010 14:52:38 +0000
No they must be free but it should be Media's responsibility not to misuse this freedom. Because Media is in real a media to fight against the so many issues and to raise the voice. Now it depends upon media person to understand their responsibility and work accordingly
By
Krishna Bhardwaj, Lyrics Writer, Freelancer
| 05 11 2010 14:31:37 +0000
Media is one of the tool available to the mass to propagate opinions / news . It is no more objective. It is always biased. In the sense that, it is reflecting the opinion of the organisation it belongs / Govt agencies it trusts / groups in which it has interest to develop.In To days India, every political or social group has a media control to emit its interest to its group. It can not be & should not be controlled by Govt. Its only the population need to understand from where it comes from & what colour it has. Say BBC, VOA, SUN, NDTV, ZEE etc. Reporter, ' it is needless to describe, take the interest of the origin where it has its faith & belief it is good for it. We need to analysis it in our perspective. We can not expect a colourless message from media anymore.
By
KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed
| 05 11 2010 12:57:57 +0000
There should be a freedom of expression. Putting a control on media will result it becoming like a mouthpiece of ruling govt. It will create more harm than benefits. Imagine in current situation of coalition government with different mix of parties at center as well as state...Media will get sandwiched! Rather there has to be a self regulation/code of conduct. And no doubt right of expression is grossly been misused by media. They are lacking a genuineness, reliability & effectiveness. Media holds the matter only till it is hot and viewed by people. We don't even know how many things media keeps / wraps under the carpet & earn benefits.
By
Nilesh Jain, Dy General Manager - Systems, A Leading Media/Telecom Co.
| 05 11 2010 12:29:33 +0000
If media people themselves advocating that,,their must be some profound reasons,,I'd not use the word 'pressure',, in a democracy every one should have the freedom but at he same time every one should be made accountable.. Thanks Sulagna for inviting.
By
ujjval jain, Retail, Retail
| 05 11 2010 12:14:34 +0000
They must be free because they themselves understand their responsibilities towards nation.
By
suresh asher, Agency Associate, Max New York Life
| 05 11 2010 12:14:20 +0000
Restricting the media equates to restricting freedom of speech. I dont think anyone should be reporting news according to their views, they can form opinions according to their views but the report should be authentic and there should be accountability.
By
David , Parts Manager, Ferrari/Maserati Spa and Bentley UK
| 05 11 2010 11:17:06 +0000
|