Is it necessary to be diplomatic for senior level?

to lead the team & to achieve the desired target it is essential

drgsivaraman.

No doubt, people sitting at the top levels have to be diplomatic, always.... One just can't afford to be straight.... Afterall the words have to be conveyed, that too without hurting the sentiments...   

Yes, "Diplomacy" is a good word often mis-understood though. It is the end result of maturity.

Somebody may say : Diplomacy = ABC ( avoid, by-pass, confuse ), often used by a section of people who are in high position or aspire to go up only to the detrement of others who rely on him/her. But that may not be real 'diplomacy'.

 diplomacy :   

• being : judgemental, logical, rational, balancing, non-bias & people oriented
• not being : cynical, fault-finding, quarrel-provoking, victimising
• doing no groupism, not being un-necessarily rude in expression, not jumping to silly conclusion all on a sudden and being farm in his/her own commitment

To answer the question, Gargi, let us look at consequences first.

By being diplomatic - the message gets across if you are reasonably good communicator. The job gets one without too much fuss.

By being un-diplomatic, the message is delivered often offensively. That irritates everyone in the picture not to mention the person to whom the message is intended. This creates a negative ambience.

On the whole, objectively speaking, regardless of hierarchy, i would submit that diplomatic way of delivering a message or decision or handling a situation is the logical and best method. The other thing one needs to realize is that often diplomacy and lack of clarity are confused. Diplomacy need not mean lack of blunt outspokenness. It is definitely possible to be diplomatic and deliver the message in a crystal clear manner.

Yes Diplomacy is an aspect of maturity and is required at all levels. Undiplomatic people are seldom mature.

I support Gargi that diplomacy can be at the senior level

I strongly support your view that certain amount of diplomacy is required. I also find some managers postpone decisions til such time that the people effected become intolerant & then their view will be either discarde. I feel while being diplomatic there must not be any prejudice or gameplaunder the guise of being diplomatic.

yes, one should be diplomatic to the seniors.

Yes, diplomacy needed at each level and in each task but it is more critical and must for Managers, i mean you can still do your job of clerk, operations, quality checking, networking while maintaining your reserve nature and avoiding conflicts but a manager can't do that. He has to be a little bad for the sake of good, to take some loss for the sake of future profit etc etc. After all  he is accountable for the end results. Being tactful is must for any leader while employees can survive with only hard work and dedication. Its more difficult to make people work in desired direction than working.  

Yes. In particular where there is conflict of interests, it's more important to be diplomatic. lack of diplomacy here could turn into ugly arguements where everybody loses.

Mr. Asoke has given the best definition for "DIPLPOMACY"

The real merit of a senior level person is his capability to handle the complex issues in a diplomatic way.

However, being over diplomatic, one may not reach anywhere. So there need to be a firm line and one should learn when to say no, in very diplomatic way, of course.

I totally support you......

as per me , one should be diplomatic at senior levels as diplomacy and art of glib are the most potent weapons for handling situations at the top level.

diplomacy is one of the basic requirement for senior level

Well, I support this idea/views.

Dear Gargi,

I support you for your every thoughts and would like to add here-with some facts like SENIORS must have abilities to help others succeed. They should appreciate every juniors with positive attitudes while encouraging them to have Passion for job with desires to be best. All Seniors must support Juniors in terms of Career challenges like Creating a professional Identity, Connection with other professionals, Collaboration and partnership with colleagues for any problems etc.    

diplomacy is needed at every level of management, it doesnt matter top or bottom level, but the top level manageent should certainly be diplomatic to handle things. they are the top decision makers and their decision has an impact on results , that means whether the organisation runs in right way or not.. being diplomatic helps to tackle things in a easy way. if there is a crisis in an organisation may be a difference in employees and employers , those kind of situations need to be dealt in a diplomatic where, mishandling will end in a mess. other issues such as change in  government policies or a imposing of duties on exports ,dealing such matters needs to be diplomatic. so it is very very essential to be diplomatic.

Diplomacy itself is the basic need to become a senior level executive.

Yes I do agree senior ppl need to be diplomatic because of company responsibility rest on their shoulders however it also depends on the issue which senior is addressing I mean if a senior is addressing a sensitive issue like somebody complain about someone to him/her he needs to listen carefully before giving his say & probably be pretty straight forward on it. This mostly happens in recruitment.

It is required, in fact, at all levels, except it is also a rare commodity to be acquired with diligence & hard-work.

most essential weapon to survive at top

I totally agree with you.

.