Is it the time of judicial activism?

improvement is a ongoing excercise 365 days a year.and improvement in judicial system is needed.we do have a efficient system and laws we miss out on the implementation of those laws.

judges can make judgements but the real test of the law is when we citizens have to follow it.can we have responsible citizens who would follow the law.

and responsible laws which are worthy of being followed.

no matter how many laws you make there would be some lawyer who would find a way out of that law.it is the job of the lawyer to save his client.before that it is his duty to follow the law in the sprit of the law.

we need lawyers who would follow the sprit of the law.it is in fashion to win cases no matter what you are doing with the sprit of the law.

the lawyers would fight the cases and win and that case would become a case law.so it becomes a law in itself.law is not just parliament it is a daily affair law is being made everyday by judges.every case becomes a reference point and is called as case law.

we do not need judicial activitism.we need judges who would follow th elaw in sprit and do not forget that they are making a law when they are passing a judgement.

when we have so many cases it basicaly means there is something wrong with the social fabric and we need to correct the problem at the point of happining of unlawful act.

judiciary is basically doing postmortem of the happening.which is a counter productive the vent has happened already what can be done to avoid happening of such event should be the solution.

our emphasis should shift from doing postmartums of cases to being in a place of active social thinking which could avoid such act from being done.

can we have a system which would make someone think hundread times before doing a act which would lead him to the legal system.

the relationship of law breaker and law maker is like a never ending cycle they are ahead and after each other from time immeorial.breaking the cycle would be a challangeing task.the cause and effect.

I completely agree with Chandrasekhar's comment here...it should not be the case where the judicial system is passing the legislature...it should be done by the people opinion in the form of the government bringing such decision and not the judicial system...and judicial system should give the guidelines and directions...and its the people's power that ultimately comes to the perspective via their elected candidates in the parliament...so here Voting plays a major role...and people should take moral responsibility to go and vote...as the voting percentage is going down all the time....