Is legalizing homosexuality by law is right in the context of the Culture of Indian society?

My opinion is that legalizing homosexuality by law indiscreminately will toll the death bells of the present concept of the micro-community that is called a family which discriminates humans from animals with well defined demarcations of individual relations and behavioral limits. 

Like in every creation of nature, there are born transvestites and other form of freaks in the human race also. Their social behavior/life style are out of biological compulsion and therefore, are to be dealt with as part of society  with sympathy and compassion and supported by framing appropriate law.

But there are many who are normal biologically heterosexual persons take on to gay life style for the thrill of it as happens with drug addicts and alcoholics and other addicts. Many get confused with their very normal homosexual experiences in the passing phase of adolscence that happens to large percent of normal individuals. Most of them adapt a normal heterosexual family life as they grow up.  

Of the remaining, except for hard core perverts, a good percent of them can be brought back to lead normal heterosexual family life style with proper counseling and the chronic ones with appropriate medication as being done in the case of Schizophrenics. Government should undertake a serious survey to determine what percent of the of the people who claim themselves as homosexuals are genetically homosexuals.

It shall be made mandatory to undergo medical check up and produce evidence before allowing couples of same sex are legalized to lead sexual life. 

Those who are interested (Mature readers only) may please read my earlier posting "Is it right to legalize homosexuality by law without discretion" in this space wherein I have dealt the issue in much detail.

DEAR SIRS,

DEPENDS UPON SEX KNOWLEGE, HUMAN BEING AFTER THE AGE OF 12 ONWARDS IF STORAGE OF SPERM OR OVAM IN THIER BODY, TOTALY THEY VIOLATE THIER ALL LEGALITY, GOD DON MISTAKE AND NOT SOLVED BY THE GOD. HE IS ALSO VIOLATING THE ALL LAWS IN LOVE OF SEX

MAHESHWAR G NAIK MSC M.PHIL

email; maheshwarnaik123@yahoo.co.in 

Homosexulaty in animals .. providing wikipedia link here  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

Dear Mr. Sujit,

The purpose of this debate is not to educate people about various forms of homosexual acts and activities of various forms of life.

Please read the topic before posting comments. The discussion is about the propriety of indiscriminately legalizing Homosexual behavior with sweeping law. This discussion is primary aimed to bring some awareness in youngsters for them to make sure themselves that they are biologically homosexuals before adopting homosexuality as their life style.

This has nothing to do with Homosexual persons. They are as human as you and me and they have all rights to live with dignity.  It is unfair to degrade them or their lifestyles with irrelevant comparsions. 

By the way, the topic is meant only for mature participants. Please refrain from posting irrelevant comments and references. Otherwise I will be compelled to delete this topic.

are argument posted by me liable for thumb down?

PLEASE ANSWER THIS.

I find there are basic fundamental errors in the responses to this debate. The debate is not about those born as HOMOSEXUAL human beings. The debate is about Homosexuality and  Homosexual acivity.

The debate is not about any sort of discrimination of Homosexual persons. Different types of Homosexual persons are human beings and like everyone else they also have full right to indulge in sexual activities in the forms that can appease their sexual desire. Homosexual persons have also full right to couple with other Homosexual person or Heterosexual person and lead a family life of their choice.

This debate has nothing to do with Homosexual persons at all.

The debate is also not about the righteousness of indiscriminately legitimize Homosexual behaviour and Homosexual activity by law which will have distastrous ramifications in the fabric of social set up and the society as a whole.  We shall leave these to the wisdom of the Honourable courts in this country.

The debate is about the possibility of the dangerous consequences of large number of otherwise normal persons; especially in the younger generation, who are born with practically no homosexual traits, get influenced by various trends of modern lifestyles, switch over to homosexual behaviour as a life style, just for the thrill of it, and indulge in perverted sexual activities that can destroy thier chance of leading normal life and become vicitms of painful and disastrous diseases that can spread like cancer in the society.

The purpose of this debate is to bring some awareness in the younger generation to make sure that they are really Homosexuals with proper Medical check up / Counselling et., before decding to adopt homosexuality and homosexual behaviour as their life style.   

I request the members to restrict the debate to the topic, and not to invade the dignity of Homosexual persons who have every right to be part of the society. 

we are known in world about culture,every country try to adapt our culture and we are doing such shameless thing...and there is no any results of homosexuality ,it means that when hetro sexuality there is result of child...main important point is we are going against our NATURE and when we are against nature that is always dangerous....

Homosexuality is a disease.. it's a disorder, how that can be promoted like this..?
No doubt it's shameless act taken our govt..! 

Anus is not meant for pleasure! Don't know how to put in words, otherwise it might become unethical to talk on in this kind of forum, but that truly shows that we are not less than animals! I strongly support this side..

How can this shameful decision be Indian ? Those members who have supported this fact, I want to ask them a simple thing. In what sense do they think this is Indian, do our culture permits this ? Not only that, before "Westernisation" of our culture, how much they know about Indian culture? Do they consider sexual relations just as a matter of enjoyment? If so, then I am sorry to say, anybody having this king of mentality is sick. Our culture allows this relation from production of children. Not for time pass like dogs on streets. Since this relation cannot give any fruitful result, so this is not Indian. Also, this was never a part of our society. Just a few decades ago when we tried to become "Westernised", we started kicking our own culture and adopt everything from Westerners. Do you think this is modernisation? not at all. It is complete degradation. At least animals moving on the streets are better than us because they get attracted to opposite sex not same sex. Earlier Eve-Teasing used to happen only with different genders. Now it will start happening with same genders also. Also the AIDS cases will increase. Waw!!! what an "lower than" animalic society we are living in....!!!!

Homsexuality is there and will be there or not is what one can never explain. But trying to illegalise it or legalise it will only worsen things, where people will start even feeling bad to hug or lay hands on each other while walking in streets , which in India is a sign of freindship. So to show that one is not a homosexual people unnecessarily get hypersensitive towards small signs and effective signs of psychological strength( the western worlds now are praising the touch therapies ). So even it one legalizes or illegalises it it wont help , but something that can help is the feeling of responsibility to be Normal and abide with the LAWS of nature rather than Human made laws. I think these HOMO cannot and shouldn ot be compared with anyone but they should think themselves as what they are doing and why in the world its important ...many have feelings of being a burglars, porn stars and even kidnappers and what not ..but atleast many of them understand by age and time that whats wrong and whats right. I feel that what the HOMOS need to understand , what type of sex is right and what not... as simple as that ...Self Responsibilty and what good does it do for them , generations and society. Just making it a show wont help.

Anything going against the course of nature is damaging. Society will have to pay for this in the long run.

There is adifference between HIZARA'S and impotent,I have translated for the people who doesn't know about hizra ,its third gender ,they are neither male nor female.

I think we are arguing about HOMO.

What is the difference between 'decriminalized' and 'not prima facie legaliased'?

In any case homosexuality is no more a punishable  offence, right?

What to talk about homosexuality as per todays news one impotent(hizara) and a boy married ,hence there should be one more law to stop this.

do you agree.? 

It spoils the balance of the nature.  On this earth every life is having  both genders  that  is the nature. Then only it survives,  we live.  The Judgement supporting the cause is not  good for the society.  By taking this support,  lot of peole comming out  openly and inviting  through web pages, emails for homosex.

We  are  not here to spoil the nature and its echology.   Is  it posible to give  future generation, if all animals, birds, flowers starts  this type of activity where we can go,  what  will be the  scene of this earth.

The reason is of course ambiguous. how would legalise,if legalised on which custom and tradition would the marriages are performed, through which Law would the marriages are nullified. In this Scenario if homosexuality is legalised Prostitution shall also be legalised. Comment please

The instinct of Homosexuality is in fact a mental dishorder. Legalising it is not a constitutional right of citizens. The Judgment needs careful review. If two consenting adults are allowed to indulge in illegal activities, then even duals in which two adult individuals fight till the death of his adversary which is recogninsed only in France should be allowed, will it not be illegal in our country. The law makes something is an offence which is against the law of nature. The nature has created man and woman to procreate naturally. Satisfying the urge in unnatural way is always danger to the society as a whole.

Legitimisation?? NO but not because it is not natural. It is natural instinct but all the natural instincts, like murder, can not be legitimised. The reasons are more scientific than social. I firmly beleive that so callled religious regulations of India are not merely intended to please the God but have been devised and arrived at based upon years of systematic studies of the scientists of those time called "Rishi".

My belief on the much more developed and nature friendly science of that time (at least I beleive so) and banning homosexuality by it, inspires me to not to support homosexuality.

Please remember I am talking of the times when there were the term Hindu, Muslim, Christian etc were not even conceived.

But I do support discussions on the topic then only all can understand that what percentage of population has welcomed the Delhi HC decision and who were they.

My dear friend i do support your idea, but you are more concerned about the childeren in their teens & what about the grown up's. The law is same to all, the amendment so far as sec.377 of IPC is still pending consideration.

We will leave it to the Judiciary & the Gov't, And see that it does not go against the Nature.

Dear Ms. Shobana / Mr. Murthy

Did you read my article on this subject posted in "Community and Social affairs".

Dear friend, Laddu, Sona Papdi and Kheer and many such are very tasty. 

But would you consume those as sole items in your daily menu? Uncontrolled Sex

may be more pleasureful  to some and unethical sex may be thrilling for some

others, but becoming slave to eratic sexual desire is un-healthy for the person

as well as for the society he is part of. The line demarcating Love and Sex is

very thin, erosion of which breaks down the concept of relations, family and

community living.   

I fully agree that for those happen to be born with biologic compulsion,

there could be exceptions. I am very much supportive about their cases.

What I earnestly plead the youngsters who had undergone some unnatural or

bizare sexual experience during their passing phase of adolescence need not 

get branded as gay by others and themselves. These are only mostly normal

sexual behaviour for many during the growing up period, and almost all of

them come back to normal heterosexual life style later as they grow up

and paired with a suitable person of opposite sex. What I suggest is to

give it a try to know and understand yourself before you throw your entire

family to great pain for something on assumptions that could be unreal

and could be overcome by exercising some amount of self discretion.

As to what i have learnt for these many years in my life or rather everyone has learnt is that, men & women are created by God to be bound with each other forever.
 
In our law homosexuality was not given any importance till date.The law was totally against homosexuality because it is against the law of nature. This decision of law is really embarassing because it also questions the upheld culture of Indian society on several basis.

Legalising homosexuality is like insulting the relationship between male & female.

I agree with you. I always feel decipline is a loving exercise. When a mother or father exercise decipline, its to say i care. However, when a child says its my right, parents decide it taking the responsibilty. Similar maturity is required in this case. This law is like no responsibilty. I agree that homosexuals should have basic right but how will a law decide who is hemosexual. A mistaken adult child will be out of reach of his/her very caring parent or his well wishers. The law on abnormal sexuality isn't right. We need social awareness but no rights under a law. When will we understand, some changes can also be wrong. Everything that happens in west isn't right.

Homosexuality is against nature laws, this shouldn't be allowed. And there shoud be law to stop it, as previously it was. No experiments shoud be there be govt in this case atleast.