Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  2 of 6 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : Metro rail construction issues
  Rate : 
 
Created by : Venkatesh M, Warehouse Manager, Larsen and Toubro  | 02 25 2010 11:49:28 +0000
Industry : ConstructionFunctional Area : Growth(Strategy & Execution)
Activity:  285 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

Every year as the population is increasing, number of vehicles are also increasing exponentially.Conditions are worst in the metros & other big cities. People from all over are coming to these cities in search of jobs, higher studies, etc. with each of them prefering to have their own means of transport.Thus as the number of vehicles go on increasing pollution level goes up and also other traffic related problems are faced by common man.

So, now we have to find some alternative way to reduce the traffic by deviating some commuters in different other ways or making them use some other means of transport that is better than their vehicles.Now question arises, Is metro rail the only option for heavy traffic & pollution? Please comment.

 
 Refer 461
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes Vs No
9
 
 
 
 
14
9
13
Support   Support
Top Argument
3
0

Mostly for bigger cities I think metro is the only solution fo the growing vehicle population. Metro will provide a better,faster & cheaper means of communication for commuters.Even it will help to reduce pollution & road accidents due to overcrowding.


By Venkatesh M, Warehouse Manager, Larsen and Toubro  02 25 2010 11:49:28 +0000
 
Top Argument
5
0

Metro is not the ONLY solution but it is one of the better ones. There are many other options available now than they were say 50 years ago.

1. Use of busses

2. Metro

3. Suburban trains

4. Car pooling

5. Living close to work

6. Working out of one's home

7. Moving the place of work to suburbs

These are just a few of-the-top ideas. If one gets really creative and start thinking out of the box, it is possible to come up with many more.

The idea is to move large number of people with minimum damage to ecology - for this Metro is one of the best available today.


By RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants  03 04 2010 06:39:14 +0000
0
0

I support  Shanmugasundaram.


By malladi madhukumar, AGM -MKTG, Andhra Cements Ltd  | 04 04 2010 15:48:44 +0000
1
0

Metro is one of the best system to reduce traffic and bring more upper middle class people to take public transport.

In the same way,the government make government busses with facilities,crowdless,dirty less,noise less...smoke less..Then most of the people will not even thinking about taking their car and drive in heavy traffic...


By Shanmugasundaram , CEO/MD/Director, Safnnite Solutions India Pvt.Ltd  | 03 26 2010 16:50:07 +0000
0
0

Metro Help to Avoid Traffic Congestions, Save Time and the Most important part is - It save Environmental Pollution.


By Rohit Thakur, Sr. MEP QA/QC Engineer, QA/QC INCHARGE, CONSTRUCTION SPECIALIST-MEP  | 03 06 2010 04:31:39 +0000
1
0

Considering the soul purpose of a metero rail,Yes. it definately help to interven in a positive way to commute public relam.but the ironay is that tha appication from city to city differs.deep undustanding of socio economic on one hand and transport planning  before implementing is a must.


By ketan v nanal, Freelancer, Freelancer  | 03 04 2010 06:12:29 +0000
1
0
Metro rail is a technological boon for daily commuters for safe and fast moovement and controlled pollution for society
By prabir bhattacharyya, A.G.M(works), HCL  | 03 04 2010 04:45:02 +0000
1
1

In current scenario the answer is yes.The most important advantage of metro is it goes neck to neck with the road so,it is better option for anbody to use inplace of his/her own vehicle or inplace of any public road transport.And the best is it is fastest among al other road transport.So,in current scenario it is the best unless and untill there is a drasttic  positive change in the condition of road and traffic.


By aqueel , Managing Director, Bhawishya Nirmaan Constructions and Management P Ltd  | 03 03 2010 15:13:43 +0000
1
0

In the Cities where the huge development has already taken place by the side of the road, Metro is the only option. Though the initial cost is huge, it gives better returns in long run.


By Murali K Balla, Technical Support Manager Atkins  | 03 03 2010 13:55:08 +0000
0
0

I Support Mr. Ramesh Kandadai’s view.

 

Also, the following can be considered :

 

1. The Government can encourage developments or develop satellite towns near larger Tire I and II cities. These cities must have connectivity via suburban trains and good road network. 

 

2. In these towns too, the government can give tax sops to developers who develop complexes with both large office space and a propionate amount of residential spaces (Walk to Work).

 

3. Build a dedicated bus corridor network.

 

4. Go all out with sops in order to encourage people to take up cycling. Encourage people to use cycle for local use (for going 2 to 5 Kms from home). Design and Build dedicated cycle corridors on roads. Cycle traffic is better manageable than vehicle traffic.

 

5. Have stringent methods to issue road license. This would prevent “Road Rouges” from acquiring license and flaunting it on road by very bad driving.

 

6. Have lots of mini busses. These can drop and pick up persons to and from the stations.

 

7. Make it mandatory for schools to take in students who are residing within a radius of say 3 to 4 kms only.

 

These and many more can be implemented for better traffic and transportation in the future.


By G A Narayan, Real Estate Consultant  | 03 09 2010 05:08:27 +0000
0
0

I fully agree with Mr. Ramesh's view and alternatives suggested by him. I would like to suppliment with following points:

1. In addition to moving offices to subrubs, the govt. should encourage companies to move to smaller cities by giving them incentives for opening offices there;

2. It could be made mandatory for the companies to provide accommodation to their staff within few kilometers of the office/factory;

3. Mixed multistory office cum residential buildings may be developed; where office staffs could have accommodations;

4. Like car pools, non-stop mini bus service should be started between major destinations. This will encourage even those people to use public transport who otherwise hesitate to do so, because of higher travel time compared to personal transport. Delhites, must be aware that PHAT-PHAT SEVA from Jama Masjid to various destinations in Delhi is quite poular in the masses;

5. Metro is also an expesnive service for aam aadmi (Max fare for bus service is  Rs. 15 half of that for metro. Earning of an unskilled construction worker, lets say on metro project itself, just Rs. 150 per day).

6. Enhancing suburban railway service could also be a big and cost incetive help for decongesting our roads.


By Tauheed Ahmad, Project Engineer, MTR Corporation  | 03 07 2010 16:38:18 +0000
0
0

I think to regulate the number of vehicles on road there could be one solution.

On odd days allow odd numbered vehicle and on even dates allow even numbered vehicles.


By Ashok Datta, Director Projects, ProInteractive Services (India) Pvt Ltd  | 03 06 2010 05:27:35 +0000
1
0

I support Mr Ramesh Kandadai's argument. It is absolutely correct and metro rail also a must. Every work place in not nearer to metro station, it may be few hundred metres or few km away. In this situation alternate facility required. That may be bus, car pool etc....


By Chandramouli , Sr. Manager - QS & Contracts  | 03 05 2010 04:07:05 +0000
1
0

Agree with Ramesh,

Metro should not be overused. In any case placing all eggs in same basket can never be the best idea.

Railways and Trams must as well pitch in in suburban transport it may require separate lines yet are less expensive in comparison to Metro. It is only where land availability has diminished that we should look to Metro and Sky-rail-bus. 


By Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India  | 03 04 2010 06:33:10 +0000
1
0

Traffic regulation is the only option.Design the traffic scheme leaving space for pedestrians,scooters,cars,and cycles.Metros in some way touch the nerve but not the curves.


By Mohammad Bakhsh, Project Leader/Managing Consultant, Freelancer  | 03 04 2010 04:27:33 +0000
2
0

Thousands of new vehicles jumping to road daily....A law should be formed to control the new production of any vechicles in our country. unless don't dream jam free roads......


By Binu Yohannan, Visualizer, Uninor  | 03 03 2010 13:43:45 +0000
1
0

To a certain extent yes metro can be one of the solutions to the problem of traffic congestion and increase in no. of vehicles but with ever increasing population even the no. of commuters through metro has increased manifold leading to overcrowding in metro. The improvement in infrastructure, roads can resolve the problem to certain extent besides increasing the frequency of metro and transportation facility.


By Rajiv Shekhar Bhandari, Presales & Business Development (U.S.), Magic Software Pvt. Ltd.  | 03 03 2010 12:36:48 +0000
1
0

NO Metro is not the only solution for the growing traffic congestion. Following steps need to be taken on priority before the things go out of hand.

  • Widening of existing road and infrastructure.
  • The ring road was supposed to be without red-lights but not effective as yet. The traffic has to move very fast on this ring road.
  • Enhance the efficiency of the traffic police for them to be effective and be able to enforce the following of traffic rules by commuters.
  • Alternate routing for the heavy traffic which has to cross through Delhi. Such traffic should not enter Delhi at all.
  • Last but not the least enhance the frequency of the Metro. It would still be the major decongester of the traffic chaos in delhi.


By Ashok Datta, Director Projects, ProInteractive Services (India) Pvt Ltd  | 03 03 2010 11:43:55 +0000
1
0

Using of existing means of Mass Transit systems, improving upon existing roads and bridges would be more helpful


By Vishal Rastogi, Marketing Manager, L&T Infocity Ltd  | 03 03 2010 10:52:49 +0000
1
0

CAR POOL, can also be helpful.


By Kashif Billal, Design Manager, Fashion Designer  | 03 03 2010 10:26:16 +0000
2
0

No, metro rail may not be the only option for growing vehicle population.Metro Rail may not be able to serve everybody as they don't connect the entire city under one roof.To reduce heavy traffic we can opt for some alternatives like:

Junction improvements,Grade separation, using bridges (or, less often, tunnels) freeing movements from having to stop for other crossing movements,Ramp signalling, 'drip-feeding' merging traffic via traffic signals onto a congested motorway-type roadway,Reducing junctions etc.


By Pradeep Khanna, Construction-Heavy, DLF  | 02 25 2010 12:02:23 +0000
Specialist in IT Recruitment
Specialist in IT Recruitment
Viewers also viewed
Air Pollution Education Is Necessory vs Air Pollution Education is Not Necessory
 
945 referals 15 arguments, 114 views
A friend of mine has a project where he wants to make a social community and was unsure which...
 
120 referals 6 arguments, 332 views
Yes vs No
 
823 referals 10 arguments, 123 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (74)
More From Author
I agree with you anant. It is the best method...  
I agree with Mr.mohammad and  I think there is no such empirical formula so you can spend a reasonable amount on site investigation.... 
Hey this will help you to find the right institute..... http://www.indiaedu.com/distance-learning/india/courses/pg-diploma-courses/construction-management.html 
more...