Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  3 of 9 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : Other energy sources
  Rate : 
Associated with other topics :
 
Created by : Partha Dey, Site Engineer, Hazra Electric Co  | 03 25 2011 17:23:03 +0000
Industry : PowerFunctional Area : Infrastructure(Technology)
Activity:  233 views;  last activity : 04 24 2011 02:44:50 +0000
 
 Refer 114
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Non-conventional energy Vs Nuclear energy
12
 
 
 
 
3
7
2
Support   Support
Top Argument
1
1

Non-conventional energy sources are more safe but are not reliable. Nuclear energy is highly efficient as well as reliable but not so safe when it comes to natural disasters like what happened in Japan.


By Partha Dey, Site Engineer, Hazra Electric Co  03 25 2011 17:30:29 +0000
 
Top Argument
1
0

Being the most reliable and Environment friendly energy source, it will be difficuilt to replace it with other sources to generate energy. But after such disasters like Japan EarthQuake. I believe we should start working to find out the safety measures to minimize such consequences!


By Rohit Thakur, Electrical Engineer-Industrial, Quality Engineering and Software Technologies  04 18 2011 05:08:43 +0000
0
0
This is my request to all govts. that kindly drop the idea of nuclear energy ang go for more and more renewable energy generation. We all here to live the life not to destroy by giving it a name called development. Development on the price of human life is not acceptable to anybody or any gov. Our childeren will blame us for what they would get in future. It is in our hands : Give a healthy, risk free world to our childeren or nuclear bomb.
By Harjeet Singh, Sr. Project Engineer, Angelique International Limited  | 04 20 2011 07:02:23 +0000
0
0
Any development is a hazard, remember there was a day when people refused using LPG as cooking fuel, today there is no live to many without LPG. Nuclear Energy is always better than burning out the fossile fuels. at teh same time it is true that risk of massive destruct is high. Technology had to be developed to reduce the risks. Else the best way is to opt Solar energy where ever possible which still we are neglecting. WHY NOT WE ALL TAKE INITIATE TO ADOPT SOLAR POWER AND MINIMISE THE USAGE OF POWER BY redusing the usage of AC's, Refrigerators, Fans, Lights etc. Just try it is enjoyable.
By Mohana Varma, Head - Corporate Planning/Strategy, Technology Consulting  | 04 20 2011 06:25:06 +0000
0
0
Like I posted in one of the earlier posts, non-conventional energy like solar energy, hydel power, boigas, etc., should be exploited in full. These are eco-friendly and will protect the planet earth. However, it will not be encouraged by the Government and promoted by the businesses because they cannot benefit from this in the form of cutbacks or profits. Only the common man is benefited. But who cares for the common man like you and me?
By Raju V P, Senior Manager, an International Bank  | 04 18 2011 17:31:36 +0000
1
0
this is the time that we must start to invest our energy to find out a non conventional and renewable energy which is more reliable, more effective and more efficient
By Onkar Datt Sharma, Manager (Technical), Retired  | 04 18 2011 16:11:50 +0000
0
0
Radiation risk is looming large from the nuclear plants of Japan, and we had a witness to Chernobyl disaster in the past. India has not learnt lesson from these disasters and is heading for Jaitapur power plant of very great magnitude, not discussing the threat perception in a greater deal to favour a few MNCs under Nuclear Agreement compulsions. Environment Ministry had given clearances to a number of parameters without seeking public opinions and objective scientific observations from the well-known nuclear scientists.
By S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner  | 04 18 2011 09:27:43 +0000
1
0
I want to support Non-conventional energy. Thanks for referral, Rohit.
By SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd  | 04 18 2011 06:21:44 +0000
0
0
I know that many of our well wishers are looking the nuclear power accident in japan but as we know the climatically condition japan has a suitable way to make it safe its a concept of flying power plant at earth quake Jones so that for the time being period power plant is in air during earth quake it is expensive power plant but safe and very useful latest technology base work name as aeronuclear power plant that is under construction so i don't think that it is more harm full for our planet
By Rahul srivastava, Area Business Representative, Premium Transmission Ltd  | 04 24 2011 02:44:49 +0000
Top recruitment firm in Bangalore
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
If you want to change the world, you have to think big. Say what you want about the feasibility...
 
173 referals 19 arguments, 346 views
Some wise guy once described cricket as a game played by 22 players ,a million fools watching in...
 
6 referals 4 votes, 1660 views
India’s Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) has announced the new regulations,...
 
130 referals 15 arguments, 1970 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (4)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 97 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
MNC's should take in more freshers vs Do not take freshers
 
1 referals 2 arguments, 161 views
more...