This is my request to all govts. that kindly drop the idea of nuclear energy ang go for more and more renewable energy generation. We all here to live the life not to destroy by giving it a name called development. Development on the price of human life is not acceptable to anybody or any gov. Our childeren will blame us for what they would get in future. It is in our hands : Give a healthy, risk free world to our childeren or nuclear bomb.
By
Harjeet Singh, Sr. Project Engineer, Angelique International Limited
| 04 20 2011 07:02:23 +0000
Any development is a hazard, remember there was a day when people refused using LPG as cooking fuel, today there is no live to many without LPG. Nuclear Energy is always better than burning out the fossile fuels. at teh same time it is true that risk of massive destruct is high. Technology had to be developed to reduce the risks. Else the best way is to opt Solar energy where ever possible which still we are neglecting. WHY NOT WE ALL TAKE INITIATE TO ADOPT SOLAR POWER AND MINIMISE THE USAGE OF POWER BY redusing the usage of AC's, Refrigerators, Fans, Lights etc. Just try it is enjoyable.
By
Mohana Varma, Head - Corporate Planning/Strategy, Technology Consulting
| 04 20 2011 06:25:06 +0000
Like I posted in one of the earlier posts, non-conventional energy like solar energy, hydel power, boigas, etc., should be exploited in full. These are eco-friendly and will protect the planet earth. However, it will not be encouraged by the Government and promoted by the businesses because they cannot benefit from this in the form of cutbacks or profits. Only the common man is benefited. But who cares for the common man like you and me?
By
Raju V P, Senior Manager, an International Bank
| 04 18 2011 17:31:36 +0000
this is the time that we must start to invest our energy to find out a non conventional and renewable energy which is more reliable, more effective and more efficient
By
Onkar Datt Sharma, Manager (Technical), Retired
| 04 18 2011 16:11:50 +0000
Radiation risk is looming large from the nuclear plants of Japan, and we had a witness to Chernobyl disaster in the past. India has not learnt lesson from these disasters and is heading for Jaitapur power plant of very great magnitude, not discussing the threat perception in a greater deal to favour a few MNCs under Nuclear Agreement compulsions. Environment Ministry had given clearances to a number of parameters without seeking public opinions and objective scientific observations from the well-known nuclear scientists.
By
S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner
| 04 18 2011 09:27:43 +0000
|
I know that many of our well wishers are looking the nuclear power accident in japan but as we know the climatically condition japan has a suitable way to make it safe its a concept of flying power plant at earth quake Jones so that for the time being period power plant is in air during earth quake it is expensive power plant but safe and very useful latest technology base work name as aeronuclear power plant that is under construction so i don't think that it is more harm full for our planet
By
Rahul srivastava, Area Business Representative, Premium Transmission Ltd
| 04 24 2011 02:44:49 +0000
|