Thanks for referring this debate Purvi. Well, I am in support of what you have said that some one intruding in my personal state of affairs in not acceptable and is intolerable in the sovereign republic of India. And as the government has allegedly done this with few of political leaders, it seems to be wrong if the purpose is political gains. But if it is something related to the security of the country and country men than it is above our personal interests. Could rather should be done. Now few of my friends have mentioned that it should be done with Terrorists and anti social ailments ; but my dear friends it would always be subjective, they will have to suspect first than only they get a clue as who is the culprit. Terrorists do n not carry ID cards. Hence the right authority should be given access to such a privileged and confidential information source.
By
Prassan Kumar Sharma, AVP, Nirmal Bang Securities
| 05 09 2010 09:25:33 +0000
yes..it is true that phone tapping can violate the mother of all human rights-right to life and liberty bt given the kind of terrorized sitution to deal with, phone tapping can be permitted under compulsive circumstances, provided this is done by virtue of a newly construed legislation, a regulatory stricture and only in case of threat to the safety and security of the State and not to jeopardize individual privacy!
By
sayoni chakrabarty, Officer, Karnataka Bank
| 05 07 2010 07:33:12 +0000
thanks Purvi for referral.yes it is violation of citizen rights if,Govt.is carrying for all/some common people for vested interests.today i think this debate has generated after exposure on this issue by OUTLOOK magazine.if we go back to history on this,this issue is not new in Indian democracy and each Govt.irrespective of party ruling is using this technology for its use but,please mind all this tappings that Govt.is accused of are pertained to politicians and not of common peoples.but,if agrees that even politicians are also one among common people,YES tapping is not correct!!
By
jairaj shyam prasad, Production Manager, BOSCH Ltd
| 05 05 2010 13:32:44 +0000
Yes, phone tapping is a gross violation of Individual's Privacy, as guaranteed by our Constitution. However, given the volatile situation as we live in Today, with ever growing Terroristic Threats, where our own Diplomatic Staff could be compromised and scores of trained Taliban sleeper-cells invading our Society, if we expect our Government of the Day to protect us from danger of Terrorism, we should allow it to tap phone, selectively. This could be controlled by an Autonomous Phone Tapping Regulatory Body, constituted under law, to screen every request-to-tap and on satisfying itself of the prima facie need to do so can accord the permission and also monitor the progress and where it is satisfied that such need no more exists, can revoke the permission.
By
M. Prabhakar Rao, Author of "Mayhem Of The Miserables!", http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/52075
| 05 05 2010 11:47:06 +0000
every one has expressed good points,from this i will point out the main points.privacy is important for everyone,this is hapenning because of the some dirty politicians we are electing,if we elect good politicians this will not happen,because they will only tapped the phones of alleged persons.the solution is the politicians has to change than only this will not happen in future.
By
siva sankar reddy, CA student, icai
| 05 03 2010 13:23:51 +0000
THANK YOU PURVI GHOSH FOR YOUR INVITATION. PHONE TAPPING IS GAINING IMPORTANCE OF LATE MAINLY BECAUSE CURRENT DAY POLITICIANS HAVE LOWER LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE IN THEMSELVES,THEIR COLLEAGUES, AND ALSO BECAUSE THEY WANT TO ENSURE THAT THE CHAIR THEY OCCUPY IS NOT MADE UNSTABLE.
By
s.baalu , Consultant, XYZ LTD
| 05 03 2010 10:55:58 +0000
There are other ways to catch the cup\lprit, phone tapping does nto solve the issue, you cannot invade the privacy of the person
By
Nikhil , Senior Manager, Insurance
| 05 03 2010 05:59:55 +0000
hi poorvi thanks for reffering this debate to me ,,, in my opinion if my activity are against National security then any means used to trap me is o k , but when other issues are concerned ,,, then phone tapping is disturbing someones privacy ..............................
By
ayushman , Marketing Manager, Bank of Baroda
| 05 01 2010 05:29:52 +0000
Thanks for the referral Ms.Purvi Ghosh. You are right and I agree with your opinion. But there is some exception in case of tapping related to terrorists network. Even during the periods of our great Kings, they had their spy network, where there was no telephones at all, in order to collect information related to the neighboring state.[ military strength & other activities] But today due to the emergence of technological developments in IT & telecommunications everything like tapping & spying is happening. Hence the scientific & technological developments sometimes lead to negative aspect also. Therefore the developments have its own merits & demerits.
By
NATTERAJA R. ARIKRISHNAN, GM-Projects, Bentec Electricals & Electronics Pvt. Ltd
| 04 30 2010 19:32:21 +0000
Yes it is violation of basic right but when it comes to national security i feel the citizens have to make some sacrifices.Of Course no one would like someone listening to their private conversation.The government should also be sensitive towards the people of country & tap the phone of only those people who they have some doubt about.People of our lovely country have a lot of freedom as compared to many countries and in todays scenario some freedom can be sacrificed for love of our country & countrymen But that doesnt mean that politicians should take undue advantage for their political gain & toruble the people.
By
Wajid.Pathan , Enterprenuer (Designer /Developer/Supplier), Self Employed
| 04 30 2010 17:03:53 +0000
Tapping individual phones is an attack on the basic human rights. BUT In certain cases where the interest and integrity of the country is concerned the phone tapping can be used by the concerned agencies but definitely it should not be used by politicians in power for their political motives against the opposition leaders.
By
Onkar Datt Sharma, Manager (Technical), Retired
| 04 30 2010 14:54:40 +0000
|
Thanks, a nice debate started by Purvi. Safety and security of citizen's involves- right to life for those who may become victim due intelligence failure as well must be placed before discussing someone's right to privacy. And most would agree "Right to life" may score over "Right to privacy" , thus this is a necessity of the day, let us agree. The next question who should handle and how in most responsible manner should be preferred for discussion.
By
Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India
| 05 13 2010 06:19:00 +0000
The extremists, anti-nationals and 'fedhains' etc. have changed the rules of Privacy - otherwise it is a great offence to tap one's phone. One recollects the "Water Gate Scandal" of the USA of 1970s in which conversations were being secretly taped by President's men and led to the resignation of President Nixon in August 9, 1974. In present day scenerio, one may not blantly oppose 'breaking of privacy'. To the offenders, privacy means killing of people, putting fire on installations, offices, Parliament, hotels or even mobile towers etc and creating panic to dislodge hard earned democratic set up. Albiet, the authority to 'break privacy' must lie with an Independend Body of high officials who may be authorised in a very selective cases unlimately to report to another higher official ( ... there again remain chances of mis-use mostly for political reasons - the country is India ).
By
ASOKE KUSARI, Domestic Private Banking-Executive/Manager, A large leading PSU Bank - India
| 05 01 2010 03:37:49 +0000
|