Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  4 of 13 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : Cyber Law in India
  Rate : 
 
Created by : Shailendra kumar, Head of the Department, immigration lawyer  | 05 18 2010 05:51:08 +0000
Industry : LawFunctional Area : India(Markets)
Activity:  434 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

prevention by the states government for the out sider is justified.while constitution of India provide equal opportunity for all. through India. why they do not think that out sider contribute more then insider. and work heard for development.

 
 Refer 531
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes Vs No
8
 
 
 
 
8
5
7
Support   Support
Top Argument
3
2

Yes this is a good move by the government, government job should be given to persons belonging to the respective state. This will increase the opportunities equally in all the place or else everyone will be preferring a specific state and the growth will be more in that state only.

So one eligibility for applying for a government job should be a local citizen.....   


By Kavitha Shankar, Sr/Principal Coresspondent, ABC  05 19 2010 11:17:41 +0000
 
Top Argument
3
0

No. Every Indian citizen is an insider, and therefore cannot be discriminated by any one anywhere in the country, against getting equal oppotunity in the selection process for local government jobs.

First of all what is the criteria in deciding insiders and ousiders.  mother tongue, domicile by birth, Gothra or Tribal heritage ?  Even DNA test will not be of help. Otherwise,  such marginalization will tend to further divide between the people claiming to belong to different districts in a State.  

However, over and above considerations of constitutional rights, general legality and principles, it is also necessary to meet out natural justice to long inhabitance of the locality. This can be done by fixing an elegibility criteria of a minimum of say 10 years continuous natural inhabitance within the local locality of the State where employment is sought.

The best way to fill government jobs is through state public service commission, with selection process from among the locals who are long resdents in the state and registered thier names with the PSC. This is what most of the states do. So let us  not rake up issues of constitutional rights etc. and create unwanted problems.

 


By Abraham Paul, Senior Telecom Consultant, FCOMNET- Future Groups  05 19 2010 18:05:47 +0000
1
0

Yes local persons should be given a preference in the Government and private jobs. If some government have taken this decision, at all it is a good decision. But I am not aware if some State Government has taken this decision or made a law for this. 


By Krishna Bhardwaj, Lyrics Writer, Freelancer  | 05 19 2010 17:53:26 +0000
1
0

I fully support preferential employment of locals in all projects , whether government or private.

Once a project goes on-stream , where do the profits go ? Either to private corporates or state or central governments. How often do either states or the centre or private players develop the local community for the benefit of the locals ?

The least the local community can expect is preferential employment. Invariably , where mega projects are located in remote locations , employment is at the lowest level viz. unskilled labour. So , this is not asking for much.


By K. NARAYAN, None, None  | 05 19 2010 15:38:32 +0000
0
0

Sir, what is your "brief" here, U did not elaborate and mentioned your source ?

Which state Govt. has proposed like that ? All states may not propose ' all at a time ' ... !

---  probably they have proposed to "ban outsiders" ( people of other states, residing less than for last 10 yrs or so ) as stake of such people in that state may be insignificant .

---  probably they may not say 'local language' well

Sir, pls elaborate and let us discuss ... !


By ASOKE KUSARI, Domestic Private Banking-Executive/Manager, A large leading PSU Bank - India  | 05 19 2010 15:28:08 +0000
2
0

The core of the problem is inertia of the local people.The preferential treatment will devide the society.Inspite of that i support the move with the consideration that locals must not feel left out.


By Mohammad Bakhsh, Project Leader/Managing Consultant, Freelancer  | 05 19 2010 11:41:30 +0000
0
0

Dear Kavita,

Every state does not have / had, an IIM / IIT / AIIMS or similar institution. Hope you are not suggesting 100percent intake from state where situated and same criteria applied for job.  After all calling them Central institutions have no meaning in such a scenario. 

The competitive structure and environment where regional excellence could be compared, showcased and appreciated by all. And offered by developed states to help improve the status of underdeveloped state is at best a dream.

Should a Kannadigan, forever hesitate to make Himachal, his/ her home?

Every Indian must work ensure to eliminate this hesitancy, if it ever existed.  


By Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India  | 05 20 2010 07:39:43 +0000
0
0

Dear Shailender,

Fail to understand the "Outsider" tag in first place and if it is unconstitutional the applicators and propagators should be severely dealt with. India being one country all laws that encourage discrimination on such subjects should be outrightly held invalid by Supreme court of India.

Regionalism must not be allowed to turn exploitative or divisive for nation, at any cost.

The accurate match of candidate to requirements, is much more important than which part of India he was born or is living.

Wish our constitution makers and Independent Government had practiced this from day one. 


By Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India  | 05 20 2010 07:04:24 +0000
1
0
There is always hidden game. One senior will bring his/ her own.
By Eng. Ashraf Theba, General Manager , Al ILHAM Engg. Consultants, Group of EPC Companies  | 05 20 2010 05:28:09 +0000
1
0

because of the goverment prevanting indirectly from funamental right. and freedom to movement . not only this thy are increasing the distractive elements


By Shailendra kumar, Head of the Department, immigration lawyer  | 05 19 2010 13:16:29 +0000
2
0

What if private players starts doing that or its become mandatory for them.....why government machineries have such limits,,,,they are playing even bigger roles,,,lets remove such filters,,, let system percolate the right people to handle our riddled motherland,,,,,after all we are one nation,,,lets give our best....


By ujjval jain, Retail, Retail  | 05 19 2010 12:24:31 +0000
1
0

While keeping certain percentage of jobs to the locals, the rest should be left to every Indian citizen.


By M. Prabhakar Rao, Author of "Mayhem Of The Miserables!", http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/52075  | 05 19 2010 11:37:37 +0000
 
Viewers also viewed
Indian constitute is old one and not suitable for our culture. vs It is copy of England and...
 
51 referals 10 arguments, 363 views
What do you think Its New Generation Goverment or its King's Sons Goverment. Like Every Youth is...
 
70 referals 3 arguments, 201 views
Justifiable vs Not justifiable.
 
0 referals 7 arguments, 259 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (5)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 97 views
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 482 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
more...  
More From Author
prevention by the states government for the out sider is justified.while constitution of India provide equal opportunity for all. through India. why they do not think that out sider contribute more then insider. and work heard for development.
if she can not attend the office of the ministry she should resinr the post and leave the politices as politices is not joke. if she prefer to become politician she must joine office meeting parliament sessieon. and all worke that is in the publice...
under the indian consitutition part III have provided us personal liberity. any person is free live with any one.marrying out sied of the cast is not crime becouse of the every person bs best judge of his wone case.who is cast to deside that whome to...
more...