Is Supreme Court ruling that can never be prosecuted for negligence, right?
Recently Supreme Court ruled that doctors can never be persecuted for negligence, defining that a simple lack of care of an error of judgement or an accident does not amount to negligence, providing Doctors total relief and free them of all responsibilities, making it near impossible to prove their negligence.
While I agree with some of their reasoning, I strongly believe that the bench may have overlooked two important factors; one that most known or less known Doctors take much more surgeries and consultations, in a day, they can handle efficiently handle, always preoccupied with their next surgery , while trying to complete or do full justification, to the one they are attending to, either in the same or some other hospital, they are attached to. In doing so, they may not be devoting the required time or their total skill, to the case they attend, at o given time. Secondly, while there is some basic criteria, for a specialist or surgeon to qualify, there are grey area and many inexpert surgeons do surgery, without the supervision of a senior experienced surgeon. Same is true for inexpert specialists. Should surgeons be limited to surgeries, they can truly do justice to in a given day and specialist, limited to consultations, they can handle?