Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  12 of 16 in Topic  Next >>
 

IS THE FORMATION OF TELANGANA IS NECESSARY

Created by : AMIT KHANDELWAL, OWNER, NATIONAL ELE. / WIRE  | 12 13 2009 09:19:49 +0000
Keywords : is the formation of telangana is necessary
Activity:  1101 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000
 
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
YES Vs NO
4
 
 
 
 
2
3
2
Support   Support
Top Argument
1
0

I would have said no if i have replied before two weeks. During my last visit to Hyderabad, this was the talk of the town. I gathered some valuable information from people over there. That the cities coming under telungana are not developed. the irrigation facilities in those areas are not up tp the mark inspite of the river is passing through telungana. The politicians from the so called andhra have made irrigation facilities for their district eventhough there are less source of irrigation available compared to Telungana. This is not the only issue, the higher authority people all are from andhra. In Hyderabad corporation, the % of telungana people is  only 5%. that too they are working as office asst., clerks, etc.,. even though there are some qualified people from telungana they are not given any chance.
By Surendhar , Mechanical Engineer-HVAC, MJ Associates  12 16 2009 05:13:49 +0000
 
Top Argument
1
1

Actually the demand for carving states out of existing states is prompted by politicians who want bigger roles for themselves. If small states came into existence for their own cause,India will be separated in to small states. There is no reason to make separate Telengana. Neither culture is different nor language is. Merely on a claim that not proper development is taking place, one shouldn't divide the states. Whats the guarantee Telengana will be a success afterwards. It still depends on other districts of AP for rice and what kind of development it is expecting? Like the one in Bangalore where it will take hours to clear the traffic or like Kolkata where you won't get anything except polluted air !!! In the name of developement, there is no meaning in destroying the peace and beauty of those 10 districts. Without the so called "Developement" they'll be more happier and stressless. Thats a guarantee...
By Sarika Singh, Assistant Professor, BIT  12 14 2009 08:20:20 +0000
0
0
yes it is very much necessary now, The Telangana issue has left Andhra Pradesh limping. It began with KCR’s fast and slowly turned into a mass protest by Telangana supporters. The government cracked down under pressure and gave a go ahead to initiate the process of creating a separate state of Telangana. This upset the anti- telangana supporters who also took the streets, demanding the roll back of the decision This issue is not about Telangana alone. It is an issue which will herald a new phase in Indian polity and also change the geographical dynamics of the nation. The two big questions that need to be answered before creating the new state are- 1) Is the government moving in the right direction by creating smaller states & 2) What is the basis on which separate states are going to be carved out? The answer for the first question is- Yes, the government is very much taking the right step by creating newer states. History is a testimony that centres that are closer to the state capitals have developed at a much faster pace compared to other regions of the state. In many instances including Andhra Pradesh the resources are mainly located in the least developed areas but are utilized for regions proximate to the power centers. Smaller states will make administration smoother and efficient coupled with higher development of the areas that have been neglected by the corridors of power that a located in the state capitals. Decentralization is a key step forward. For the central government it is both a boon & bane to have smaller states. The boon is- smaller the states, lesser power they possess to bargain with the central government. But on the negative side, it will have many more chief ministers asking for funds. From the people’s perspective this will not only localize the issues but also give them more access to the government. Corruption will reduce and the government will be much more accountable. The disparity levels between the developed and non-developed areas would come down substantially. The second question is more crucial. It is imperative to have a clear & articulate principle in place to decide the reorganizing of states. In the 60’s the restructuring committee took ‘language’ as the principle to create more states. Marathi & Gujarati speaking got their own states in the form of Maharashtra & Gujarat. Similarly, South India got four states speaking different languages. Many critics argue that a state that has one language should not be divided like in the case of Andhra Pradesh. But the recent examples of Uttarakhand, Jharkhand & Chattisgarh have proved to be really successful. Jharkand along with Bihar has a higher GDP & per capita income compared to undivided Bihar (Jharkhand was part of Bihar). The language spoken in all these states is the same as their parent states. There are various ethnic groups like the gorkhas, karbis, bodos etc demanding for a separate state and so are politicians like Mayawati, Ajit Singh who feel Uttar Pradesh should be divided into two separate states as it is difficult to manage a big state. The voices demanding separate states are increasing but for different reasons. Ethnicity or even political mileage for certain parties should not be the criteria to divide states otherwise this whole exercise is futile and will turn out to be a catastrophe. Economic viability, better administration & inclusive development have to be the three basic principles on which states should be divided. The government should first & foremost set up a restructuring state committee to lay down the basic principles and policy for creating new states. More number of states will not diminish India’s size nor will it curtail the cohesiveness that exists. On the contrary if handled with care and pragmatism this just might turn out to be a key tool in bolstering Indian development pace which is till lagging behind
By bandaru yugandhar, ASSISTANT STORE MANAGER, star  | 02 22 2010 14:40:45 +0000
0
1

IN MY OPINION IT IS JUST POLITICAL ISSUE WHICH IS AROSEN INDIRECTLY BY SOME POLICITICAL PARTIES FOR THEIR SEPERATE BUT IT IS VERY UNJUSTIABLE FOR OVERALL ECONOMY OF THE COUNTRY BECAUSE WHEN ANY STATE FORMS......INITIALLY THEY HAVE TO DO SOME INFRASTRUCTURAL EXPENSES WHICH IS NOT NECESSARY........LIKE THIS MANY OTHER REASONS.......
By AMIT KHANDELWAL, OWNER, NATIONAL ELE. / WIRE  | 12 13 2009 09:19:49 +0000
0
1

yaa.....i completely agree with your view.....

THANKS


By AMIT KHANDELWAL, OWNER, NATIONAL ELE. / WIRE  | 12 14 2009 12:09:21 +0000
Argue for "YES"
Argue for "NO"
 Found the debate "IS THE FORMATION OF TELANGANA IS NECESSARY"  interesting ?  Suggest to your connections and communities  
 
Viewers also viewed
Its necessary for success. vs Corruption is not necessary for success at all
 
768 referals 19 arguments, 862 views
No vs Yes
 
1584 referals 33 arguments, 709 views
No! India can do without the FBI in retail sector. vs Yes! It is needed for both the farmers and...
 
157 referals 16 arguments, 349 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (5)
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 482 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
I am associate of prajapati association and i am working for BJP from year 2005 to till date....
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 111 views
more...  
Sponsored Jobs
More From Author
YES......THE DISCOUNT STORES ARE BEST FOR THE COUNTRY LIKE INDIA.....BSE IN IT DISCOUNTS ARE HIGHLY APPRECIATED....EVEN IN METRO CITIES PEOPLE ARE WAITING FOR IT..........
yaa.....i completely agree with your view..... THANKS
more...  
  • Popular Knowledge
  •  
  •  
  • Popular Jobs
  •