Is there something called saffron terrorism?

we have seen our CBI and  ats working on directive of  Politicians for a long time  , so its no surprise , congress can say anything for appeasement of minorities  if that man P.C.chidambaram can say about bringing hussain back in india insulting feelings of crodes of Hindues  , he can say anything , u  will find , christian and muslims only among major policy makers  of Congress now .

Pure Politics of continuing to further appease minority for votes.

Knowing fully well majority is secular and would never react.

Society is a group of people together for fulfilling a particular need or are together for protection or strength. Most of the society is based on need basis.

Society of people may be ethnically different from each other, but may be bound by common need of social, financial, political, religious or economical security or growth.

The society today can be divided into three classes or segment on the basis of though process:-

Fundamental:- Very strong views about certain issues or faith or goal, and ferociously protecting the same at any cost, believe more in the philosophy of  revolution than revolt, quantum of aggression is comparatively less

Moderate: - Strong views about certain issues or faith or goal, and would stand their ground for protecting the same, believe more in the philosophy of revolution than revolt, quantum of aggression is comparatively less

Liberal: - Very liberal views about every aspect of society, do not believe in revolt or revolution, but in slow process of gentle persuasion.

It is mixture of this that we get a society, which creates a thesis, anti-thesis and then commits synthesis. We require all the above thought process to keep the process of living intelligently going on.

What we are calling Saffron terror is a group of people who are fundamentals. And no where it is said that fundamentals are bad. Its is fanatics who form a extremist group, is what is bad for the society.

Fundamentals are present every where, and in every society. Fundamentals are usually created by society, political environment, etc.

So I don’t thing that there is any Saffron Terrorism, but it is more of a political rivalry that is being settled.

Regards

Kiran

Yes Mr.Ayan, terrorism is terrorism whoever committed. It should be dealt severely. But there is no point in making statements like it will be dealt with iron  hands etc. Such statements will never help to resolve the issues. Everybody knows the victims of terrorism, destruction & deterioration of lives & properties etc. Till date no corrective measures are taken to eradicate or to mitigate the evil of terrorism in our country.     

Mismanagement gives rise to collapse of the system internal and external vis a vis the distribution of resources fail, which in turn creates trouble makers. Terrorism is an extreme form of trouble making, which can only happen when state (country), leaders are sleeping over things or wandering around issues, shitting through their mouth etc.

“Terrorism is a by product of state (country) mismanagement”. Why will people ever resort to terrorism if they can get to do what they want to do or achieve by their presence on this planet. We live under a logical canopy State (country) “India”, we are Indians. Our identity is created for the state India which is logical. There exist no physical boundaries between India and its neighbours. To maintain this Logical entity “India” Mr. Ambedkar created a constitution and a declaration by the leaders in 26 Jan 1950 for the state India. If state (country) machinery fails gives rise to trouble of all kinds.

KALIYA sahib Gustaki maff kijiyaa, I am Dasgupta.

Terrorism is a by product of mismanaged state internal and external affairs. Has nothing to do with Saffron or Zaffran (J.K)

From our school day’s experience which we all of us have, those who did not do their home work and class work fared badly in exams. Like cheating in exams, politicians cheat (west Bengal I am from this state it happens nothing good or bad it’s an example.) to get to the power corridor.

Terrorism does not have color, why HM is referring to saffron terrorism what did he do to stop terrorism by various groups in India, some of whom find advocates in the government he is in. Does the government has the political will to fight terrorism without keeping an eye on vote bank politics or how to win the next election.  Let him come out with the steps taken for combating terrorism then one can consider/ weight to his observations.

Yes Ayan I agree with you. Here probably the HM was reffering to Hindu Group terrorism, Since if you speak of terroists that means a perticular class and he did not want to take names of any other political party.

At the end of the day a terrorist is a terroist without any colour or creed.

Ayan, good irony!

Better would have been if you had said Is there anything as saffron racisim?

You would have good many answers then.