Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  3 of 9 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : Security of India and its people
  Rate : 
Associated with other topics :
  Rate : 
Posted in Community :

Top Stories & News

 
Created by : Arti Arora, Branch Manager/Regional Manager, NII  | 02 15 2009 18:35:11 +0000
Industry : IndiaFunctional Area : Security(Others)
Keywords : national security
Activity:  686 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

India today finds itself lacking the military muscle to inspire awe, the economic might to win partners or even a political ideology to sway the uncommitted in a world in which power and force remain at the heart of international relations. It should not ignore an important lesson of history: a unilateral desire for peace cannot buy security. India's military is ten times the size of Britain's, but is funded by only a quarter of the British outlay on defence. The US spends as much on its intelligence as India does on defence.

 

WHO SHOULD COMMAND THE SECURITY - ARMY OR THE GOVERNMENT

 
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
ARMY Vs THE GOVERNMENT
3
 
 
 
 
6
3
4
Support   Support
Top Argument
1
0

I will recommend the National security should be given in the hands of the Army. By the doing this, the money which is sanctioned/provided to the Ministers for security of our Nation would be properly utilised


By Charles James, Corporate Planning/Strategy Manager, MRI  02 16 2009 06:04:19 +0000
 
Top Argument
3
1

It should be in the hands of the Government only, otherwise our country will also take the shape of Pakistan and will be become the slave of the Army


By Natasha Jain, HR Manager, Maxon International  02 16 2009 18:43:24 +0000
Arguments in: "National Security"
0
0

Hi Srikar i totally agree with your detailed comment what you have mentioned...and everybody are rejoicing about the N-deal...but they don't know the facts yet i guess....


By Radha Sundaram, Sales/BD Manager, Bharti Airtel  | 05 11 2009 07:44:41 +0000
1
0

Natasha & Everyone,

This is nice "debate" and I liked it and I would like to oppose Natasha & others who say "national security should be with governament a.k.a. common people) and I'm not opposing cause I wanted to but with suitable reasons given below:

1] Our Country can never become like pakistan, if national security is given to Army -or- forces since we are not providing them the power to governance but to protect the external & internal threats to our democractic machinery and systems in place (please read again how communists are taking advantage of our current situation), our forces so nationalistic that even in emergency period they never revolted I agree that does not guarantee the future, but this definetly shows the character of the army.

2] Normal people cannot take "sensitive, serious & strategic" national security measures who occupy the office of the government, since they have no knowledge about "geo-politics" and "threat management", the elected people can only try to save themselves for 5 years since the day they are elected, I hereby quote some very stupid blunders the politicians done in the past, without considering the long term consequences of it.

a] Mr.Nehru, had gifted the land of Tibet to China on the pretext that China has more cultural similarities even though people of Tibet wanted to join India

b] Nepal wanted to join India at the time of formation, he did not consider the plea (please check the national archives)

c] Since 1955 to 1961 december our border forces updated Mr.Nehru that chinese are building roads on the sikkim & tibetan side, Mr.Nehru had no clue why would a neighbour build highways in hilly areas where there's no presence of their people

d] Mr.Nehru, had gifted Cocoon Islands to Maynmar, stating it is too far to manage, excuse me when it comes to self or Nation every millimeter of land whether waste, barren, useless land you must protect it even though that is not yealding any value. Today, Maynmar has allowed Chinese listening posts to be erected on CoCoon Islands and they are a big threat to our forces stationed in Andaman & Nicobar Islands.

e] Mrs.Indira Gandhi after winning the 1971 bangladesh war did not consider to prosecute the POW (Prisoner of war) for their atrocities in Bangaldesh.

3] Most Important, I feel, our politicians have no Idea of nuclear power & nuclear detterrance - if you want peace you must have power and period........there cannot be any questions in this.

Instead they have signed backdoor NPT i.e. 123 Agreement, means, India would purchase, obsolete nuclear power generation technologies to provide us electricity at the cost of opening up all our nuclear facility clearly stating where we produce fissle material for our nuclear detterrance, what a shame.

Just can someone search in the Google as India: fast breeder reactors ---- PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, do a search, using thorium as a fissile material, if you feed it for the first 10 or 15 years with nuclear fuel (both are different, you need nuclear fuel to run your nuclear power generators), then it would keep on producing for the next 30-40 years (subject to verification) and India has abundant "THORIUM" reserves in the north east and that's the reason china wants to take north east (sikkim & manipal) into its fold and the US wants to control us for the next 50-60 years that means, whenever they want, they will stop supply of nuclear fuel for our power generation.

I'm tired of giving more examples...........did I made points clear.
Regards,
Srikar(098670-48443/ 09342-8648-18)


By SRIKAR SAGI, Manager-Security Architecture & Engineering(Sr.Security Architect), PayPal  | 05 11 2009 05:46:15 +0000
0
0

HI Natasha i completely agree.Handling the power of the country in the hands of the army will more or less be detrimental to our nation as we can see from the example of pakistan where army rule of musharraf has only taken the country to the downhill.But i also think that it is not necessary that our nation will be in the same turmoil as pakistan because of army rule but still the government should only have authority to run the country.


By Gargi Sinha, Senior Consultant, Hewitt Associates  | 04 14 2009 10:04:34 +0000
1
0

yes i am in support of he fact that security only be affirmed when its in the hands of masters that is offcourse government .....


By varsha , Head/VP/GM-Quality, frac  | 02 17 2009 16:47:32 +0000
1
0

Yes i do agree with natasha on this that the national security should be in the hands of the Government, as people's voice will be heard and let Government which is formed by people handle the national security and the country's interests


By Dayanand Deshpande, Senior Consultant, Ernst & Young  | 02 17 2009 05:32:26 +0000
Leading IT & ITES recruitment firm
Viewers also viewed
I have a idea that National Identity card should be important for us... So we should start a...
 
594 referals 76 arguments, 4057 views
Today I went through a post which named “To educate a girl is to educate an entire nation” ....
 
667 referals 8 votes, 693 views
In a surprising news, recently the Gujarat High Court dismissed the claim by the petitioner that...
 
475 referals 149 arguments, 4538 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (5)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 107 views
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 502 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
more...  
More From Author
thanks for refering
I always enjoy your poems.. wonderful. What ever poem u refer they represent life of a common man and touch their hearts
You are right most of the organisations do reference check for only senior officials.. But i think it is equally important to do check for even middle and junior level, where the risk of changing the job is very frequent, risk of sharing important...
more...