Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 1 of 19 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : Best & Worst Stocks
  Rate : 
 
Created by : Esha Johar, Risk Analyst, Irevna  | 09 07 2009 05:54:17 +0000
Activity:  342 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

The IPO of Oil India offers an investment alternative to those seeking to gain from India's oil sector. The valuations which is at the higher price band of Rs 1,050, the company will be valued at 12 times its earnings for the 12-month period ended June 2009. ONGC, which is nearly 10 times bigger to Oil India, is currently trading at 12.8 times its consolidated annual profits.

The company is offering 2.4 crore equity shares of Rs 10 each to raise up to Rs 2,777 crore. The government of India, which currently owns 98.1% in the company, will sell an additional 10% stake to three oil marketing companies bringing down its stake to 78.4% of the post-issue equity.

So what do you think guys is it good for a short term gains or does it look like a longterm investment material? Would like to know your views on this..

 
 Refer 86
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Short term gains Vs long term investment
1
 
 
 
 
12
2
7
Support   Support
 
Top Argument
3
0

According to me it will be good for longterm investment rather than short term gains as reports suggests that the risk factors associated with it makes a longterm rather than going for short term gains as all the company’s petroleum reserves are concentrated in the upper Assam basin and are in a natural decline phase.

The company till now has been highly conservative in expanding its reserve pool depending on small and medium size discoveries to ensure future production growth. Volatility in the crude oil prices will be an important concern going forwards.  The valuations looks like similar to that of ONGC which means investors cannot hope for much short term gains but looks good for a long run investor.


By Esha Johar, Risk Analyst, Irevna  09 07 2009 05:54:17 +0000
0
0

Short term gain is good...provided you have invested with your own funds. If on listing also you get 5% returns, then your return on funds employed for 21 days is very good. Also if you have had any short term loss this year..you can square up with this short term gain...

From this angle I feel it is worth it.


By suchita Ambardekar, Director on Board, Vir Rubber Products Pvt Ltd, Vir auto enterprises Pvt Ltd  | 09 07 2009 16:13:21 +0000
0
0

Short term gain is good...provided you have invested with your own money. If you get even 5% on listing. The return on investment for 21 days..is worth it. Also if you have made any loss on short term this year  you can square it up with this short term gain....

From this angle I feel it is justified....

 


By suchita Ambardekar, Director on Board, Vir Rubber Products Pvt Ltd, Vir auto enterprises Pvt Ltd  | 09 07 2009 16:09:16 +0000
1
0

Past two big IPO's Adani and NHPC didn't realised the returns investors. The grey market speculators are still in losses and not reached the break even. On that, since the issue is a huge premium to face value, thousand rupees would earn minimum Rs.100 per annum at 10% return. So, I think it is better for long term investments...


By Esha Johar, Risk Analyst, Irevna  | 09 08 2009 13:39:12 +0000
1
0

good for short term and long term too such companies take a huge time to come to this stage.the fact that only 72 lakh share would be in public would make it a punters delight.

no one dares to play punter in public sector companies.they are slow to react,when faced with competition dies a natural death.the company doe snot have any use for the money raised it would be a burden on the returns generated unless put to some great use.

it is surprising why government has taken this route when there wa sno need for funds and no project what so ever the money is only going to add to the cash balances.by th emost fixed deposit.

even if it does a fixed deposit the earning per shar would go up considerable because of other income.since the issue is a a huge premium to face value.thousand rupees would eanr minimum 100 rupees per annum at 10% return.


By sandesh saboo, Research Associate/Analyst, saboo associates  | 09 07 2009 16:49:23 +0000
2
0
Description : Corporate
Headline : Oil India to hit capital market on Sep 7
Date : Aug-31-2009

Oil India Ltd (OIL) will enter the capital market with its initial public offer (IPO) on 7th September.

The offer will be open from September 7 to 11 and the price-band has been set between Rs 950 and Rs 1,050 per equity share.

OIL, which produces 3.5-million tonnes of oil annually and is the nation's second-largest state-run explorer, will offer 2.64-crore equity shares to the public through the IPO.

An 11 per cent fresh equity will be sold through the issue while the Government would divest 10 per cent of its stake at the IPO price. Post-IPO and disinvestment, the Government's stake in the company will go down from 98.13 per cent to 78.5 per cent.

 

I got the above information from livemint.com. There we see the Petroleum industry is tracking the Sensex till feb09 and then diverges with lower returns than the Index. MyIris.com has only their financials of 03 and 02 where then they seemed to be doing good. I feel with such premium short term gains cannot be expected may be lower than the Index returns.


By Mathew Cherian, Research Associate/Analyst, Western Michigan University  | 09 07 2009 13:34:42 +0000
1
0

I think it would be a good bet for long term rather than short term, but rather I feel there are better options in the market in the same industry. The last two big IPO's Adani and NHPC didnt realised the returns investors expected. The grey market speculators are still in losses and not reached the breakeven.

Where as the industry it is into has a long term benefit, the returns do not gets generated in the short period as the gestation period is longer in this industry.


By Darshil , CEO/MD/Director, Darshil Cotton Company  | 09 07 2009 10:27:07 +0000
2
0

I believe that OIL INDIA is a good long term bet, looking at the current market scenario, i do not believe that the investors will get a good short term return.

Also the space the company is into is more of a long term as right now the things are not going good for them, the valuations are fair enough and so no much upside is seen at the time of listing. Also the participation may be less as the leverage investors are yet to break even in the last two IPO's...

Purely on fundamentals, the company is a very good long term investment...


By Japan Shah, H.O.D, Oxford School of Management  | 09 07 2009 08:42:15 +0000
1
0

I think it is a long term investment. Considering the current scenario and ecnomic turmoils it is always better fro long term purpose. Short term purpose may not be fulfilled. It is very good for long term as the scenarios are changing.


By Amit Gupta, Manager, BANK LIMITED  | 09 07 2009 07:18:10 +0000
Get the Best from Us !
Viewers also viewed
The latest figure say that 2011 has seen a downward trend in marketing via twitter and facebook....
 
1648 referals 12 arguments, 502 views
Quality has word of mouth publicity vs Marketing is somewhat necessary for awareness
 
1249 referals 30 arguments, 596 views
Yes, passing the lokpal bill is an effective step vs No, much more will be required than the...
 
902 referals 46 arguments, 814 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (5)
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 492 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
I am associate of prajapati association and i am working for BJP from year 2005 to till date....
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 111 views
more...  
More From Author
A set of people believe that dreams change and hence buying a dream home just increases the maintenance cost whereas renting one is relatively better option. In today's world where the property rates are increasing like nothing else. Which...
JV needs more dedication and yes sir back stabbing approach kills it all. The end result of a well set JV with values gives more value.
No we are not.. not right now. We are still in recovery stage and this time I do not think the same mistake will be repeated. Having tough time is one thing and going back to recession is totally different, we cannot mix them.
more...