Yes, they do. However like all systems, it must evolve with the times. Employees are no longer the silent partners that they used to be. They are now far more empowered and contributing than they ever were. So a 360 degree feedback - the employee, his colleagues, his subordinates, his boss and himself - must be taken in to account i the performance appraisal is to be worthwhile.
By
RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants
| 03 22 2010 04:39:45 +0000
Performance Appraisals don't work on three fronts: 1.During translation of organizational goals into segmented goals for jobs and individuals 2.Accurate assessments of individual's performance and individual's defensive reactions to appraisal 3.In aligning individual performance ratings & merit-related pay
By
Ranjeet Kumar, Policy & Strategy, ******
| 03 21 2010 16:36:38 +0000
we are in the age of world class manufacturing through performance management. have to make performance appraisals work, encouraging self appraisal for performance improvement, identifying training needs, giving feedback and counseling, objective ratings in terms of well differentiated performance based on strategic objectives, the results and the competencies, future goal setting and expected value addition, potential appraisal. the performance appraisal system needs to be customised and improvised based on the strategic objectives of the organisation raising the bar each time as well as avoiding the past mistakes occurred impacting employee morale. the processes be designed and facilitated collectively to promote ownership, as well as managers be well trained to handle the system professionally and objectively, while all employees need to be well briefed. the top management needs to leverage the system to work to the advantage of organisation and culture development to contribute to performance management rather than use the system for just reward administration. there could be realistic goal setting with support, quick quarterly reviews to prevent the memory from fading, half yearly feedback and counseling for performance development, and critical annual review differentiating the overall performance critically ranking the individuals, standardising the performance across the departments for equity factoring overall departmental performances, having a scientific reward/incentive system linking with company performance as well as team performances, encouraging 360 degree feedback, freezing development plans for each individual in terms of training, promotions, succession planning, job rotation/job enrichment etc performance management must be a strategic objective of the organisation everything well linked up, monitoring the development actions round the year as a full time job facilitating the process with the needed support systems, using the performance management system as a sounding board seeking feedback for organisation development and culture the factors built into the review process. thus the whole system and process must be placed at a premium as any other organisational function alike the quality assurance function with a dedicated corporate team round the year and continuous research and innovations, with people involvement, with targeted organisational process outcomes enriching the organisation each time. we need to make the system work not leaving the gaps to themselves addressing them wholesomely with both in-house comittment and expertise and inviting outside expertise. organisations over the last 15-20 years have done lot on the subject and a body of knowledge can be surely available. handling the system with inherent sensitivity treating people with consistency not giving in to the commercial priorities saving on the budget when the employment market is down, can have employee expenses reserves in the balance sheet to meet with all people requirements even during tough times, while could be an effective retention strategy too investing in future people performance utilising the lean times for people developmental work. regards/kshantaram
By
kshantaram , GM-hrd/hr professor
| 03 20 2010 15:48:07 +0000
Ills, always, exist in system. There is no system foolproof. So, totally neglecting an element of a system does not produce wonder. Rather, one has to refine it. Mean to say to find out remedy for ill-working if reported. Keeping aside the issue will not give yields. One has to clear the tumbles. If it blocks through, other element enshrined in the system be used so that the ill is rectified. Its also a part of the work. Just neglecting the issue does not solve the problem. Generally, there may be, cases where we find some objective appraisal. In that case, the individual involved can rise the issue to next immediate superior. IT NEVER STOPS HIM TO GET WHAT HE DESERVE FOR. We discuss the system element as an appraisal method, the ills can always be rectified by other elements of it. Such as grievance open counciling,appeal to higher authority etc.
By
KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed
| 03 20 2010 13:07:17 +0000
Actually performance appraisals work around, for hardworking guys it is the supervisor/reporting manager takes care of it. It is we who does work hard on all aspects, have to show the reporting manager the work he have done, till so far, meeting him personnel or have an one-one meeting with the manager. It is the call we need to take it, because performance makes the person proud, built his energy, give him self-confidence to work more in future. It is the guy who have to take call of this seriously on every day or every timesheets which have been sent to Manager on daily or weekly basis. If the supervisor remembers only recent things or does not remembers your performance, then we need have an meeting before the apprasials or on the time of apprasials. We need to have good managers then we will grow and company grows with hardworking guys. It is the company which we believe and join, thinking we will get good managers. Hope for the best and best happens everytime and performance are taken care for hardworking guys. Believe yourself and have faith.
By
Rajabharatari S Lagali, Customer Service Representative, Vxceed Technologies LLC
| 03 20 2010 11:48:12 +0000
Yes, performance appraisal works, it plays a key role in an organisation. Well I myself belive that this is the best way to analyse the performance, productivity as well as behaviour of conduct of employees among them in the company. Performance Appraisal enables an organisation to distinct their loyal & hard working employees among rest of all & able to give all sorts of employee benefits to the deserving candidates.
By
Archie Saini, Document Coordinator, Oasis Technosoft
| 03 20 2010 10:51:42 +0000
Yes, management appraisal works. This is the best way to check the performance, productivity as well as the behaviour of conduct of the employees in an organisation. This is the only way by which an organisation can categorise its loyal employees among all & able to give the all sorts of employee benefits to the deserving candidates.
By
Archie Saini, Document Coordinator, Oasis Technosoft
| 03 20 2010 10:39:52 +0000
|
Performance appraisal is a one of trash document. It is done show up of HR dept and some others. Really who knows these type of documents really help hard working employees............ or what the managers think that applies..............
By
Chandramouli , Sr. Manager - QS & Contracts
| 03 22 2010 04:09:22 +0000
Sure'ly it does'nt work, if the focus of the exercise is entirely only on rewards and most importantly in organziation's where there is large head-count of human capital, wherein, the quota system surptiously creeps to cloak the in-efficiencies in the shortling process and mass favoritism. To avoid this I effectively use a home grown Activity reporting tool that on daily basis provides me of my HoD's their reportees a 360 degree view of the tasks assigned, performed on each an every individual at a click of button. This minimises the effort during the appraisal exercise, since the performance chart is in view in real-time basis. At the end of it consolidation of appraisals across the board is just a click away. This helps me in rewarding my top performers the rewards, and at the same time, gives me the insight where and how my team has to mentor the underperformers to bring them up to our expectations. Hence I say, Focus on transparency in the appraisal process is a must - since every individual that we have selected is an asset to the organization - who looks forward to grow along as the organization grows. So - the Appraisal Process Work's
By
Berzin N. Sethna, Sr. Vice President & Head New Initiatives - Technical & Functional Domain in BFSI at KCS
| 03 21 2010 15:56:18 +0000
These are techniques used in company cultures that adorn role plays. So it has it's wn merits if the task out comes of the employees are measurable and calibrable. Problems occur only where the outcomes of takss cannot be measured, just subjective measures can lead to errors. In existentiol company cultured these are done through managerial accounting where it is more accurate, no subjectivity involoved. Even in BPO's which are role cultured I believe the measures are objective based and it is done for better control and decision making. It helps the management to apprise the state of work going on and take correct decisions rather than to improve performance which cannot be expected to get improved beyond certain threshold called PPI, production possibiiity index, the performance of the most efficient employee. In many cases I have seen it effects employee attirition and moral.
By
Mathew Cherian, Research Associate/Analyst, Western Michigan University
| 03 21 2010 05:46:48 +0000
No doubt, the performance appraisal plays a vital role in keeping a check and control upon the performance of the subordinates. And simultaneously, it cannot be denied that it is a two edged weapon. On one hand, the reporting manager or the superior supposed to write the annual report, keeps control upon the performance of the subordinates, and on the other hand, if not having pure intentions, the superior may go to demand undue favour from the subordinate in the name of Annual Performance Report. But then, this is true for almost all the things. Things or policies can always be utilised as well as misutilised, varying from person to person. Performance Appraisal, if done in justified manner, certainly acts as an important tool to augment the productivity of organisation, by means of providing incentive to the employees to give their best output. The manager writing the report should understand the great responsibility that he has been given and should write the report justifiably, keeping in view the performance of the individual for the whole year....
By
Arinjay Kumar, Administration, BSF
| 03 21 2010 02:13:01 +0000
To make the performance appraisal more effective and result oriented, the best way according to me is to breakdown the employee's job acccording to his given KRA, into various tasks and sub tasks in measurable quantities, and grade the employee's actual performance in a 1 to 10 scale and compared against a predefined mean expected average performance figure 'x', in a computor made chart, quarterly, half yearly and yearly. There shall be different such charts, for work, conduct and behavior and other attributes. The entries and results shall be transparent to the employee. Decision on increment, bonus, ESOPs, other perks and promotions shall be based on result oriented performance and comparative merits based on the overall result of this exercise.
By
Abraham Paul, Senior Telecom Consultant, FCOMNET- Future Groups
| 03 20 2010 18:01:11 +0000
No..it does not reflects the perfomance of hard working employee.. because the manager or supervisory staff need to fill the coloumns putting just tick marks on any one of the choices given as "satisfactory". good, "best" . etc.. it really not reflects the challanges taken by the employee... Perfomance may be measured by periodically by different tests along with the appraisal..
By
Reni sebastian, Assistant Engineer, State government of Keralam
| 03 20 2010 17:26:35 +0000
As i see the corporate world, I will say No. I will support Mehul, He said right that the Managers take it as a work (extra work; ie burden ) and don't show more attention. And in my words if you are doing any job by taking it as a burden then it can't be good whatever is the thinking for making this procedure.
By
vivek kumar shrivastava, iPhone application developer, wildnet technologies pvt ltd
| 03 20 2010 11:28:45 +0000
I do agree with you Gargi, The performance appraisal plays a key role in the company. I myself believe that this is the best way to analyse the performance, productivity as well as behaviour of conduct of employees among them in an organisation. PA enables a company to distinct their loyal & hard working employees among rest of all & on behalf of the PA report a company can give all sorts of employee benefits to the deserving candidates.
By
Archie Saini, Document Coordinator, Oasis Technosoft
| 03 20 2010 10:58:01 +0000
No, firing an employee, managers cite performance appraisal as the task they dislike the most. This is understandable given that the process of performance appraisal, as traditionally practiced, is fundamentally flawed. It is incongruent with the values-based, vision-driven, mission-oriented, participative work environments favored by forward thinking organizations today. It smacks of an old fashioned, paternalistic, top down, autocratic mode of management which treats employees as possessions of the company.
By
Mehul Babulal Dalki, Asst. Manager/Manager -(NonTechnical) HSE, Wartsila India Limited
| 03 19 2010 17:33:58 +0000
|