retrench ment of employees only for shake of profit and downsizing of organization is right?

EMPLOYERS SHOULD THING TWICE BEFORE EMPLOYING PEOPLE AND HAVING RETAINED THEM FOR SOME TIME SHOULD ONLY THINK OF UTILISING THEIR SERVICES TO INCREASE PRODUCTION AND PROFITS.

Retrenchment of employees as seen in the past, does not have basis. The reason given is rationalization. Often companies are laying off employees on the basis of personal grudges with their superior or HR. People who are close to management survive these layoffs. Companies do not see in this case the role employee is playing. How important is it for the project. In fact in one of the organization it retrenched those employees who were on low paid salaries rather highly paid employees, who were making less contribution to the Co.

I agree with Janaki Ram. Actually such questions should not arrise in an organised company.

The staffing is based on long term planing. The long term is a composition of a series of short term planing hence the retrenchment of staff/s doesnot arrise at all in the first place. On top of that no company will retrench staff/s in order to increase profits since the other staffs are watching and the progress graph of the company will start showing down turn trend immidietly.

So according to me the retrenchment of staffs in ordr to increase profit does not go together. At the most to reduce expenses the company may offer volentry retirment plans to the willing employees.

not right if the purpose is to rip more and more profit. it should be done only when the existence of the organisation is in danger.

Retrenchment is a necessary evil for any industry. It can not be termed as an illmethod by employers and needs to be assessed in proper perspective for a given business situation.

From employes point of view not right from employers point of right else the employer will nto exist so there ha to be some one who will hve a funeral it only people down the order not above