Actually I would like to respond to this question - a 'yes' and a 'no'. No doubt (Corporate Governance) CG has failed! But that is only the effect! What is the root cause for that failure? Let us look at the turn of events after the fateful Jan. 7th.
D CA swung into action after a couple of days of media outcry and appointed a three member Board for Satyam.
The state machinery was tentative, initially, in arresting the CEO who admitted, voluntorily and to the surprise of powers that be, to the financial crimes committed by him.
Then there was a debate who should investigate the crime, whether state or central investigative machinery! Common sense should dictate that, when the effects of the crimes greviously affected cross-border states, it should become the subject of central investigating agency, but no, political will overrules common sense for some mysterious reasons. what are the governance standards for the governments? Corporates are operating within the framwork of such government governance (GG)
Then a central minister, according to the media, has ruled that Satyam fraud perpetrators can be convicted further on some more provisions of criminal law, if the government WANTS (mark these words in bold letters). When it comes to trying the criminals, on fresh evidence under addtional grounds, should it not happen automatically and the law should take its own course? Why it should be left to govt.s' likes or dislike? How can a govt., an artifical person, can have wants, likes or dislikes? If, as per our constitution, "no one is above law", why differentiate?
After all, the legislative institution, in a democracy, consist of executive machinery and non-executive and independent legislative parties/members. Drawing parellel to a corporate Board which also consist of executive machinery and independent/ non-executive committee of directors, can we ask what the independent legislators are doing when the government's executive machinery is twisting the arms of the very legal provisions passed by the very same legislators?
In fact, corporate board, unlike the legislative institution, is not a democratic set up entirely! Hence, it is all the more reason for the goverment machinery to follow GG as model, so that CG can be tone up properly.
To sum up, the ligislative set up should have GG standards first. This will tone up legal set up, law enforcement set up and the regulatory set up. Once this happens, the CG will greatly be forced to function effectively!
This should be the norms of governance for all countries not only for India so that whether USA or India or China/ Russia can clear cobwebs in their coroprate entities, instead of blaming each other. Global Investor confidence will return only then!