Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  10 of 13 in Topic  Next >>
Topic : banking and insurance
  Rate : 
 
Created by : Rashmi Chawla, Cust. Service Manager, Leading Bank  | 10 01 2009 07:39:18 +0000
Industry : BankingFunctional Area : Business Models(Strategy & Execution)
Activity:  463 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

State Bank of India  is opposing the proposal to allow banks distribute products of multiple insurance companies. The regulator has been toying with the idea of freeing banks from corporate agency norms that restrict them from selling products of more than one insurance company.

A panel constituted by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) is re-looking at whether banks should be allowed to be distributors of insurance products from multiple companies.

A report containing recommendations of the panel is expected to be released shortly. Those in favours of multiple companies say that it would give more choice to policyholders while those opposing it say that it would lead to banks pushing products that offer the highest commission. It is also said that SBI Life Insurance with its parent bank had made a presentation to the regulator wherein it advocated a regulatory framework where one bank sells products of one life insurance company.  But then there are lots of arguments in both sides.  

So what do you think guys Should banks be One bank, one insurer model or one bank, multiple insurer model? Share your thoughts on this?

 
 Refer 216
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
One bank,One Insurer Vs One bank, Multiple Insurer
9
 
 
 
 
14
7
11
Support   Support
Top Argument
2
1

I  would go for one bank one insurance model than multiple and the reason being product familiarity with only single insurance companies, the other reason for favouring the one company model will be the servicing aspect. When there is one company the resolution of complaints is seamless as the one-to-one relationship makes it easier to relate to each other with many insurance under one roof it will lead to chaos everywhere and still the insurance industry is still in its early growth stage and at least in the formative years it should be one bank one insurer model and then later with time and experience one can also go for multiple insurer model.


By Rashmi Chawla, Cust. Service Manager, Leading Bank  10 01 2009 07:44:42 +0000
 
Top Argument
2
0

I think banks should provide more than one company's insurance as there will be options for people under one roof, and one can easily choose products which is suitable for him and this will help a lot for the insurance companies and banks as this will be an additional form of revenue generation.


By Niranjan Meena, Actuary Manager, LIC  10 03 2009 07:12:02 +0000
0
0

I agree on you on Service aspect but i think banks still doing their agency job and all service matters are still on as whole rely on shoulders of insurance company whether bank is banka partner or not at the time of service issue

 


By Dushyant Hada, Territory Manager  | 10 06 2009 07:24:47 +0000
0
0

Basically all Bancka models are revenue driven and ironically in India Insurance still sold not bought. If there are multi Insurance partner for single bank then I think they would sale expensive unit link plan, expensive pension plan, expensive term cover etc etc but they will do all these as per client requirement??

 


By Dushyant Hada, Territory Manager  | 10 06 2009 07:21:01 +0000
1
0

I do believe that one bank have multiple product to sell it clients


By Alok , Advocate, SALES TAX AND INCOME TAX  | 10 01 2009 11:57:48 +0000
1
0

i agree with this


By Sunil Kumar Gupta, Project Analyst, Pugmarks  | 10 01 2009 08:34:29 +0000
0
0

I dont agree to those who dont believe in financial planning.

I never admire to bias selling,

Companies representatives always sell the products of their compaines .because they are to achieve their target.

If banks are working with varity of products , I dont see any thing wrong with this things because I think they can serve their customer better via this


By sachin , Freelancer, Freelancer  | 03 26 2010 17:48:31 +0000
0
0

This is what the sub brokers for the insurance companies are already doing. What difference the State bank is going to make. You will say State bank will take only those insurance cos who are good financially. My answer to this is all these things are sub brokers are already doing. If the customer is not informed and does not ask the advisor about the credibility of the companies than it means the customer is illinformed. Evem if all the products of different companies are under one roof only those products of only those companies will get promoted which are easy to sell. Nobody will take the pains to sell those products which are slightly complicated to understand and sell.


By Aditya Sharma, Insurance Advisor/Analyst, LIC OF INDIA, ICICI LOMBARD  | 03 03 2010 07:14:45 +0000
0
0

hi ! wont it be better if it is a 'financial shoppe' providing the all possible avenues in matters relating to finance akin to a shopping mall wherein one can have all that, mostly, a house needs?


By Ravichandar S, investment  | 12 22 2009 08:08:33 +0000
0
0

It's all about business and making money in the business.Spreading your eggs across different baskets and offering more diverse products (rather than relying on 1 product PROVIDER).

To summarize whatever fetches good business should prevail and chances of coming closer to todays mantra "faster;better& cheaper"is possiblr through non reliance on one.


By Shailesh Vadalkar, Business Analyst, Al Rostamani Pegel LLC  | 10 08 2009 19:05:22 +0000
1
0

World over the Successful Bancassurance Models are one bank one Insurer models , however a Bank can successfully sell products of more than one Insurer if the total number is restricted to not more than 3 to 4 Life Insurers.


By Maria Colaco, Insurance Advisor/Analyst, AEGON Religare Life Insurance  | 10 06 2009 04:23:46 +0000
1
0

I support Nirnajan Meena's argument. There are two clear cut benefits: 1. Competition 2. Choice for the customer. These market forces will force the banks/insurers to take care of the servicing aspects.

SBI Life will naturally oppose, it is out of the insecurity feeling.


By SHARATH CHANDAR REDDY, Business Development Manager - Insurance, I T C Ltd  | 10 04 2009 21:26:44 +0000
1
0

THEY SHOULD ACT AS DISTRIBUTORS AND NOT SOLE AGENT.WHEN SOLE AGENCY COMES MISS SELLING BECOMES HIGH AND VERY HARDLY PUSHED.DISTRIBUTION REDUCES THAT RISK, LEAVES LOT OF OPTION AND FINALY THE INVESTOR CAN MAKE HIS OWN CHOICE.WHERE S WITH SOLE AGENCY SUCH OPTIONS ARE ZERO AND ARISES HIGH RISK.


By INDRANEEL SEN GUPTS, Security/ Equity Research Analyst, ianalysis.com  | 10 04 2009 12:17:36 +0000
1
0

Now the time is like that we want all things at one roof so its good if we get all insurance products at 1 bank so that the person can get the knowledge of all the products which are available in the market and can chouse the best product out of the list which he have to chouse.


By Mohammadarif.A.Shaikh , Consultant, My Learning Centre (CALORX)  | 10 03 2009 14:20:29 +0000
1
0

One bank,Multiple insurer option is crucial especially when its the case for Micro insurance where the Poor and people BPL are its beneficiaries . These population donot afford to pay higher premium to cover their risks which are much higher than the risks encountered by a VIP who could be anyone like a film actor, politician, a model etc and who can afford to pay huge premium. Since many development organisations like NGOs and MFIs[Microfinance institutions] are coming forward to extend this services to the poor if they have multiple insurance players from a single bank this will surely serve their purpose of providing quality product without consuming much time in selecting the players since consuming time will reflect in not able to manage the poor people's risks in right time. 


By Anandselva , Freelancer, Freelancer  | 10 03 2009 14:03:35 +0000
1
0

I fully agree that banks should be allowed to sell products of different insurance companies but only well trained staff shold be there to guide the customers since thru my expeirence i have found thay the banks selling life insurance policies do not have the requisite product knowledge and are just selling insurance to meet the targets assigned to them in addition to their routine banking job.The banking staff is not equipped with expertise of selling insurance products and in some cases the customer buys life insurance products from its banker only under obligation which is not good business practice.Moreover, since life insurance policy is for long term relationship after sale servicing of the policies sold by banks needs to be regulated.


By Ajay Syal, Insurance Advisor/Analyst, Icici Prudential Life Insuranceo Ltd  | 10 03 2009 13:47:12 +0000
India's Leading Executive Search Firm for CXO, VP, Leadership hiring
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
Yes vs No
 
0 referals 2 arguments, 196 views
Two years back when I started earning I did not have much idea about insurances.. But now I do...
 
1772 referals 5 votes, 220 views
The Banking sector has woken up to the potential in the rural sector. More and more specialized...
 
1 referals 21 arguments, 1303 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (4)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 97 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
MNC's should take in more freshers vs Do not take freshers
 
1 referals 2 arguments, 161 views
more...  
More From Author
I agree to this question that intra day must be stopped....if it resembles betting. Even IPL is also a betting process that is glorified...but no action is taken by the govt. Thus ...its clear that whatever the govt. does for profit is good and...
India has topped a list of the most "over-regulated countries in the world" in a survey on Asian business and politics by Hong Kong-based Political and Economic Risk Consultancy Ltd (PERC). The survey used responses from American executives about...
I agree that we live in a inflated market which exist only in our perception banks are responsible for it....
more...