Please do not blame science for the misuse of technology by Humans. The same knife can be used to cut vegatables and kill a living being as well. It is all the mentality of human that matters, not technology or science. Regards, Anna George. Web Analyst. Nichepro Technologies. Bangalore. http://www.nichesuite.com
By
Anna George, Web Analyst, NichePro Consulting LLC
| 03 06 2012 05:13:33 +0000
ENERGY WITHOUT ANY FUEL Dear Muralidharan ji Unlike Cycle Dynamo or any other Energy Devices ON EARTH, my Machine don't need any Paddling or any Kind of Fuel Like Diesel, Petrol, Kerosene or any External Source like Solar, Hydro, Wind or Nuclear Source at all. I have designed a Machine, which will change the WORLD........ NO FUEL AT ALL, NO SOUND, NO POLLUTION, NO MAINTENANCE........... Just go through the TOP ARGUMENT on the RHS
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 01 2011 08:54:06 +0000
Invention is mother of necessity! We have long forgotten Bicyle dynamos. Bicycle lighting the visibility of the bicycle rider to others in dark conditions, i.e. to increase the rider's conspicuity and to enhance the ability of the rider to see, illuminating the way forward. Both reflectors and active lights are used to make the rider more visible, and many jurisdictions require one or more types of light to be fitted to bikes ridden at night. White light in the front, red lights in the back, with orange reflectors on the side is the most common setup. Many types of light sources are used for bicycle lights. Bicycle Dynamos are alternators equipped with permanent magnets. They are typically claw-pole generators and deliver energy at rather low rpm. The sidewall-running bottle dynamo used to be the most popular type for many years, but today the hub dynamo has taken over. There are a few other types (spoke dynamo, roller dynamo) but those gained limited popularity. In Europe, most bicycle dynamos are rated 3W (that is 500mA at 6V). For sure, the power of a dynamo light system depends somewhat on the speed. In a standard light system, the power is zero at standstill, at moderate speed it's 3W and at very high speed, it's just a little bit more than 3W. Some manufacturers include limiting zener diodes or other forms of overvoltage protection, to make sure the voltage doesn't rise to levels that kill the light bulb(s).
By
S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner
| 08 01 2011 04:50:04 +0000
ANYTHING IN EXCESSIVE IS ALWAYS HARM FULL.AS FAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IS CONSIDER ADVANCED COUNTRY LIKE JAPAN IS GOOD EXAMPLE, TECHNOLOGICAL MUCH ADVANCED, BUT THEY CANT SAVE THEMSELVES FROM TECHNOLOGICAL NATURAL DISASTER.SO BOTH IS NECESSARY BUT IN CONTROL.
By
shubh agarwal, ASE, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)
| 07 31 2011 06:04:52 +0000
By using such type of things we will save several life by announcing the danger of flood and tsunami, they can told the person about the whether, I think that their is no harm in using science and technology.
By
Saumya Gupta, B.Tech/B.E. student, SRM University, Chennai
| 07 28 2011 14:11:03 +0000
Science n tech used without greed n for progress r good. To alleviate poverty, for national pride n prosperity, science is good, but it has to ahve a holositic viewpoint so that the environment is not affected .
By
neha singh, Content Editor, Avestia Corp
| 07 25 2011 18:31:09 +0000
Its not science and technology its us.. cuz we are one who make and use it.
By
Shravan Yadav, Sr. Engineer - Design(Solar), Envirodyne energy systems
| 07 25 2011 15:22:05 +0000
Technology have grown manifolds in last few decades and so the pollution. We invent new things but at later stage we always think of its consequences on environment and human life. Why can't we start thinking parallely and invent ecological friendly products. By wasting our natural resources, what future have we planned for our next generation. I know technology is bringing us ahead but at what cost......Isn't it our health.
By
Gaurav Jain, GM Operations, Textile Rubber & Chemical Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd.
| 07 21 2011 13:03:26 +0000
Yups..It true that today science has spoiled our environment...so much as so many of us depend on it.Don't do the things as our own which leads to so many diseases also. Like we use so many GYM appliances rather than to go for a walk, etc.
By
Himanshu Aggarwal, Application Developer, Magic Software Pvt. Ltd
| 07 05 2011 11:05:12 +0000
we have to use science otherwise we can't live in this environment,but we have to avoid technology in developing new weapons and hazardous creations.It is spoil our life and emerging generation also
By
VIMALAN , DIRECTOR, VIRGIN ENGINEERS
| 06 23 2011 15:23:26 +0000
It largely seems to me that we have over-exhausted the usability of technology through scientific means or vice-versa. Now my personal observation and research on the impacts of technological advancement on human health and behavior :- 1 :-We the human beings were doing good with old techniques of letter writing and posting some items. Technology introduced and we started e-mailing and started a virtual world, where at one end it seemed easier but on the other part this has rendered some person jobless and aroused health issues like low back pain and Spondylitis due to long hours over the PC. 2 :- our potential powers seems to deplete and we are becoming lazy, as we were able to see somewhat better in dark than we are seeing now and moreover we needed to work hard in olden days to get every thing done which in turn kept us active but with the introduction of electrical equipment we were getting brighter nights and cooler air in hot summer and hot room in winters which in turn depleted largely the resistance power and also in turn immunity. 3 :-With the introduction of sophisticated means of energy like atomic power or nuclear energy there came the disasters and there is no need to explain what happened in Chernobyl and in recent days Japan, which also rendered disastrous and devastating weaponry systems like the atom bomb. 4 :- With the over extensible use of chemicals for irrigation for making crops ripe prematurely and also enhance the looks and size delivered us tasteless and harmful fruits and vegetables also the growth of different new biological challenges are seen like new viruses and bacteria which were absent in older days. Remember the BT Brinjal and the Bottle-Gourd in news of recent past and now the Cucumber in China. 5:- With the growth of automobiles, mobile phones and internet network traffic we are threatening ourselves of pollution from both the air, noise, and radiation. 6:- With all kinds of scientific and technological advancement we are actually going behind as our ecology, environment, and global temperature everything at stake and we are not sure to put everything as clean and non-polluted as it has been before. 7:- Researches says due to over utilization of missile and satellite technology there has been an alarming depletion and regression in the concentration on the ozone layer and that has got some holes in it moreover to add to the grim the layer has become thinner and the process is continuing which in due course leaving us prone to the harmful radiation from the Sun and can leave us sun burned and even skin cancer. My points are concerned only directed towards an appeal for reasonable use and utilization of the technological resources we have and as always exaggeration of everything is indeed bad and technology is over-exaggerated Thank you for giving me a platform to put my views on this really serious issue.
By
Ardhendu Pal, Technical Support Officer, Convergys India Services
| 06 19 2011 03:27:23 +0000
Ajay in the name of Science & Tech we are spoiling our Environment to the larger extent, Western countrys which has used Scinece & TEch to the maximum extent has realized this mistake & now encouraging the other countries to maintain their eco balance & funding them for environmental projects. We must be cautious in using the Science & Tech.as it is double edged sword. We must ensure it will serve our Need & not Greed.
By
nagesh rao, Freelancer, Freelancer
| 06 17 2011 08:18:04 +0000
Dear Iranna, I support you 100%. Thats why we say "Necessity is the Mother of Invention"
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 17 2011 06:13:08 +0000
sir, Science did not invent new things.Infact they used only environmental substance and derived. Everything is their environment, scienctist they deriving from it. Scientist are not better than environment. We have forgotton environment is father of all. Every time we r finding out of it, nothing else. Still many things are their where even scientist don't know wht all out nature has!!!
By
Iranna , Software Engineer
| 06 17 2011 04:57:24 +0000
Mr Nagesh Rao, I support you 100%, Pl. keep it up
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 06 16 2011 20:06:41 +0000
hello Padmaja,no doubt science and technology has done a wonderful job for mankind but,still we are experiencing lot of deteriating factors related to environment.any further advancement/improvement should be without harming mother Earth.
By
jairaj shyam prasad, Production Manager, BOSCH Ltd
| 06 15 2011 14:59:23 +0000
Science has no End, the more we explore it, more it come up with new things!but we should not ignore the facts causing lot of damages to the environment.
By
Rohit Thakur, Electrical Engineer-Industrial, Quality Engineering and Software Technologies
| 06 15 2011 11:17:38 +0000
It will be great if you can support me in this debate
By
vinod gautam, a.p.o., mnrega
| 06 15 2011 10:50:01 +0000
Its the evolution of the human brain which changed us from cave dwelling flesh eaters to what we are today, And science & technology being a by-product of the highly evolved brain compared to other primates. It looks like humans are a mistake in the scheme of evolution of species that we don't have brains to put the limits on our exploits.It was a big technological leap when man started using bow and arrows to hunt and gather. But we did not leave it that. We are still producing bigger and powerful weapons of mass destruction. My point is that science & tech are just tools and as long as human brain retains its animal instincts we are on the path of total destruction of the race and the planet, and technology helps to speed up to the end.
By
Nataraj S Narayan, Software & Technology Consultant
| 06 15 2011 10:41:36 +0000
For using Science & Technologies is caused our environment more. Ex if u consider Mobile, TV, Industry, Bomb or weapon etc These r the things should be used limitedly. If u use more it polutes environment in all aspects. Suppos if u consider Industry it makes nois polution, sound polution and water polution. If u consider chemicals used by formers for their fields may effect to food grains and it may effect to human body after having it.
See all wat we say science is good. Science produced least helpful and many dangerous health problems might cause human being. Though we depend on again in science by taking medicine(english)
By
Iranna , Software Engineer
| 06 14 2011 18:28:14 +0000
|
I support no
By
shah rukh, Project Engineer
| 02 25 2012 08:10:26 +0000
No i don't agree,It all depends on the usage of Science and technology. We human beings are responsible for this spoilage not science and technology. http://www.nichesuite.com/
By
ricky P, SMM exeutive,
| 02 03 2012 12:26:13 +0000
No, its not true according to me coz we cant forget that Development in field of Health Sciences, and other related fields credit goes to Science and Technology. And Biofuel, and biodegratation are the best examples of it...
By
Shephali Shaligram Bhagat, Bio-Medical Engineer, Govt of Mah. Health Services
| 02 03 2012 05:16:57 +0000
We can never blame technology for the spoilage of our environment. It is we humans who are spoiling the envvironment making wrong use of technology. Let us go hand in hand and save our environment. Regards, Shruth & Smith Foundation (NGO). Banshankari, Bangalore. http://www.shruthandsmithfoundation.org
By
Shruth & Smith Group, Owner, Shruth & Smith Foundation
| 02 03 2012 05:02:05 +0000
LIFE ENERGY - SUPREME OF ALL ENERGIES What is the form of Life Energy, what is the formula of Life Energy, How Life Energy Works, What happens after Death, What is Atma(Soul), What is the difference between Atma(Soul) & Pran(Life Energy)..... I will try to reveal them all...........
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 05 2011 17:59:43 +0000
WHAT IS PRAN (LIFE ENERGY).... PART-2 As described earlier that our Body has 4 Layers - Sthul, Sukshma, Karan & Atma STHUL(PHYSICAL) SHARIR(BODY) needs Life(PRAN) to continue its Existence... Till PRAN(LIFE ENERGY) is associated with our body, our Body can act, move, think & all other good or bad works.. CONCLUSION: PRAN(LIFE ENERGY) is associated with the OUTERMOST LAYER i.e.,STHUL SHARIR, whereas ATMA(SOUL) is the Innermost Layer i.e, inside the KARAN SHARIR
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 05 2011 17:28:49 +0000
WHAT IS ATMA(SOUL), WHERE IT EXISTS PART-1 Our body has several Layers like ONION, the Outer Body is STHUL SHARIR(BODY), the 2nd Layer is Sukshma (Invisible) Sharir (Body) & the Third Layer is KARAN Sharir which is in Existence because of our Wants & Wishes and Inside that KARAN SHARIR is the most important ATMA(SOUL), A Part of Almighty GOD (PARMATMA)........ Conclusion: ATMA(SOUL) IS INSIDE KARAN(BECAUSE OF WANTS & WISHES) SHARIR(BODY)
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 05 2011 17:27:39 +0000
NITIN, thanks for supporting me
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 02 2011 09:54:40 +0000
The thing you are saying sir, that mass is converted in to energy is only taught in schools and is the big misinterpetation in the school and this seed the person mind as mass can be converted in to energy. but at the scientific level it is understood that mass is storage of energy.
By
Nitin Mehra, Writer, Thinker, Technology Seekar
| 08 02 2011 03:16:59 +0000
ENERGY WITHOUT ANY FUEL
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 01 2011 20:02:47 +0000
Dear Nitin My theory will change many old Theories/Concepts/Beliefs 1. Law of Conservation of Energy will be not be relevant anymore 2. Energy Can be Created without transforming from one Energy to Other... 3. Science is Absoluteness rather than Relativity... It was a mistake....by Einstein 4. Energy is to be redefined, In my opinion all the Energies, which we know at present are not actually Energy..... I am still working on it......... Soon reveal about the same.... 5. Mass is the Holder of Energy, When we break Mass - Energy is released, not that Mass has converted into Energy, Plz refer my earlier Arguments.......... As per present belief, Mass can be converted into Energy and Energy can be converted into Mass, but as per my theory, this belief is WRONG. In fact, Mass is a BIG Storage House of Energy, when the Mass is Broken, Energy is released - AND we think Mass has been converted into Energy. Example 1: Water Pot - When we hit a Water Pot, the Pot Breaks and the Water inside the Pot Comes out, do we say that the POT has been converted into Water Example 2: Balloon - When a BALLOON is Pricked, it blasts with a Sound & Air inside the balloon is released - Do we say that the Balloon has been converted into Air CONCLUSION: Similarly, Mass has Huge energy stored in it, when we break the Mass (Nucleus), Huge Energy is released, NOT that Mass is converted into Energy, but the Energy stored inside the Mass is released.
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 01 2011 20:01:42 +0000
very wisely said by taking safe way.what about the other two question. the energy conversation rule and real machine.
By
Nitin Mehra, Writer, Thinker, Technology Seekar
| 08 01 2011 12:17:31 +0000
No, I am not using Atomic Power to Generate Energy. It don't require any External Source Like Nuclear, Solar, Hydro or Wind, nor it require any Fuel like Petrol, Diesel or Kerosene
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 01 2011 11:55:28 +0000
Mr. Ajay you are saying right. Mass is just the holder of energy. But when you talk about breaking the nucleus or fusing the nucleus you are applying the theory of atomic power. but you said that you will not use nuclear power. Here is conflict in your statements. please clear what you want to say. also what about the rule of energy conversation. are you saying that you are going to false that rule. also are you saying you are going to made the real machine.
By
Nitin Mehra, Writer, Thinker, Technology Seekar
| 08 01 2011 11:47:59 +0000
Dear Nitin Mehra, Gopi Krishnan & S. Muralidharanji
Plz Go through the TOP ARGUMENT Carefully & give me your Opinion, You can also Contact me at Mob: 9933115511 Science is a Continuous Process, it is always updating & Modifying, I have my own Theory on Mass & Energy. As per present belief, Mass can be converted in Energy and Energy can be converted into Mass, but as per my theory, this belief is WRONG. In fact, Mass is a BIG Storage House of Energy, when the Mass is Broken, Energy is released - AND we think Mass has been converted into Energy. Example 1: Water Pot - When we hit a Water Pot, the Pot Breaks and the Water inside the Pot Comes out, do we say that the POT has been converted into Water Example 2: Balloon - When a BALLOON is Pricked, it blasts with a Sound & Air inside the balloon is released - Do we say that the Balloon has been converted into Air CONCLUSION: Similarly, Mass has Huge energy stored in it, when we break the Mass (Nucleus), Huge Energy is released, NOT that Mass is converted into Energy, but the Energy stored inside the Mass is released.
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 01 2011 09:16:16 +0000
ENERGY WITHOUT ANY FUEL
Unlike any other Energy Devices ON EARTH, my Machine don't need any Kind of Fuel Like Diesel, Petrol, Kerosene or any External Source like Solar, Hydro, Wind or Nuclear Source at all.
I have designed a Machine, which will change the WORLD........ NO FUEL AT ALL, NO SOUND, NO POLLUTION, NO MAINTENANCE...........
Just go through the TOP ARGUMENT on the RHS
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 08 01 2011 08:58:20 +0000
Wow! amazing, does it works on law of gravity?
By
Gopi Krishnan, Senior Executive - HR., Satven
| 08 01 2011 07:08:26 +0000
Mr. Ajay Khaitan, The thing is how you will make the energy that will start initial rotation. and the other is how you will generate the energy that will be use against the various forces, that will be applied to that rotation. and more over you are saying that you have made a real machine. which is only conceptual till now. and you are also challenging the universal rule of energy conversation given by einstine. Are you really mean it what you are saying? If yes i am really in the fan club of you.
By
Nitin Mehra, Writer, Thinker, Technology Seekar
| 07 31 2011 21:33:50 +0000
from how many years will india be still a DEVELOPING NATION???
By
Sindhu S Manja, visiting faculty, St george college
| 07 27 2011 04:28:24 +0000
It is not the folly of SCIENCE ... that it is misused by erring Man (Hu-man) ... Science is just a tool and expression of Natural Laws and Principles and Creative Innovation using these laws and principles and cannot be blamed, if Man has generally not shown practical wisdom in using it intelligently, moderately, wisely and judiciously ... Atomic power can be a boon as well as bane, if in wrong hands !
By
anup bagla, M.Phil student @ AHRD and Consultant / Specialist - Process & Environment, Energy Conservation & Sustainability, Stanley Consultants I P Ltd. (On Assignment basis)
| 07 22 2011 07:23:59 +0000
Science is the Best
It is flexible, always Updating, A New Theory replaces the old one....... Science is a continuous process of Learning & Modifications........... There are thousands of Scientists & People involved in it.... for the betterment of Mankind....
Science is like a Great River....... Nurturing the whole World......
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 07 21 2011 12:14:49 +0000
why to blame innocent science and technology ? Does science says use atom to destroy cities or light up city ? Pistol was invented not to kill someone but to protect oneself.So,Will you blame Samual Kolt or the person who is misusing it ?
By
Ranjeet Kumar, Mech. Engg,Kurukshetra University
| 07 21 2011 12:00:06 +0000
Even without Sci -Tech there is no surety that nature will have any mercy on humans , so why stop progress for something uncertain
By
Amit Pandey, Embedded Engineer, Electronics
| 07 21 2011 11:41:24 +0000
ENERGY WITHOUT ANY FUEL
I am developing a Machine, which will generate Energy without any fuel. It will not require Solar, Wind or Hydro energy at all, nor it will require any kind of fuel or Nuclear Source.
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 07 18 2011 19:30:23 +0000
Science & Technology can be used either way Construction or Destruction So we are responsible not the Science & Technology
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 07 10 2011 12:20:51 +0000
Each and Every science and Technology is invented and Developed for human only, so its very much necessary for humans,, but handling by humans makes to spoil the environment, So if we handled properly means its great gift for us,,, Thank you
By
PRAVEENKUMAR.V , Associate Software Engineer, Minveli Infotech
| 07 05 2011 09:19:38 +0000
Was the world more beautiful before the advent of science and technology.Most probable answer is not affirmative.Then why blame science and technology.
By
Ranjeet Kumar, Mech. Engg,Kurukshetra University
| 07 05 2011 08:45:10 +0000
Without science and technology we wouldnt be online on a social community ! We would still be tending to our fields and looking at the sky to see when it is time for lunch etc. or rather we would still be in the caves hunting for our prey !
By
Jaygopal Raghavan, Marketing Manager, Landmark Group
| 07 05 2011 07:44:51 +0000
We can change India with or without Baba Ramdev & Anna Hazare There are only few problems 1. We are not united / Unanimous
2. We are not taking the Lead 3. We are egoistic & always fighting 4. Not really interested in Solutions 5. Always blaming others 6. Hatred of any kind
Solutions
1. Honesty 2. Love / Respect
3. Truthfulness 4. Faith / Trust 5. Determination
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 29 2011 11:11:34 +0000
India at the Top - No Taxes, No Corruption Corruption Free India within a month, All Corrupt people will tremble with fear & nobody will dare to Loot & Terrorise India. I can make India Tax Free & there will be surplus money. I am not talking about bringing back the black Money from foreign banks, but I will create Money from the presently available Resources. Job for all by Bringing Indian Economy on the Fastest Track Free & Best Medical treatment for all - No Mediclaim needed, after all, life of every Citizen is Important
Like Atal Behari Vajpayeeji, Best Infrastructure from North to South & East to west and connecting Rivers to control Floods & Droughts
Best Education for all, no Competitive Exams at all, bcoz Education is the most Fundamental Right of every Citizen & nobody should be Deprived. More importance to Science & Technology to fetch Nobel Prizes Limited Cricket & equal Promotion of all the Sports & Games Court Judgements within 2-3 months, all pending cases to be disposed within 6-12 months There is a long list in my mind............I will make all Happy, nobody will be in Distress...... SUGGESTIONS INVITED....
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 28 2011 14:25:40 +0000
Why we are blamming Scince and Technology for Spoiling the environment,responsible one is the Human itself,more specifically Human mind.Scince and technology have given us the power to create better environment,more comfort,much efficiency but we used it in another way.
By
piyush sharma, Software Engineer, ANMSoft Pvt. Ltd.
| 06 24 2011 14:34:22 +0000
Hiren Sheth, You are Excellent
By
Ajay Kumar Khaitan, Consultant
| 06 21 2011 17:42:08 +0000
I do not think it is science and tech, it is human behavior. We have technology which helps us to survive. If there was no technology , no progress.. we would still be in the cave eating raw meat... Its the evolution of the human brain which changed us from cave dwelling flesh eaters to what we are today, And science & technology being a by-product of the highly evolved brain compared to other primates. It looks like humans are a mistake in the scheme of evolution of species that we don’t have brains to put the limits on our exploits.It was a big technological leap when man started using bow and arrows to hunt and gather. But we did not leave it that. We are still producing bigger and powerful weapons of mass destruction. My point is that science & tech are just tools and as long as human brain retains its animal instincts we are on the path of total destruction of the race and the planet, and technology helps to speed up to the end. It is just like killing a man with a gun and telling the bullet did it. We the people are responsible. The improper use of science and tech made all this. We cant just wash off our hands by blaming the science nd tech. For using Science & Technologies is caused our environment more. Ex if u consider Mobile, TV, Industry, Bomb or weapon etc These r the things should be used limitedly. If u use more it polutes environment in all aspects. Suppos if u consider Industry it makes nois polution, sound polution and water polution. If u consider chemicals used by formers for their fields may effect to food grains and it may effect to human body after having it. See all wat we say science is good. Science produced least helpful and many dangerous health problems might cause human being. Though we depend on again in science by taking medicine.
By
Hiren Sheth, Sr. Sales , Al Nabooda Group
| 06 21 2011 15:17:03 +0000
The creation of man will tend to have some side effects. We have to find ways to nullify those side effects instead of go on accusing the Science. We take medicines for some illness, that medicine may have some side effects but it is the most effective medicine to cure the illness. We have to use the medicine and use some other capsule or tablet to nullify the side effects of it. What we are missing here is no corrective measures are being taken for the side effects of S & T.
By
Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.
| 06 21 2011 06:59:45 +0000
Thanks Padmaja for referral. I think it is an on going process and is absolutely necessary for the advancement of human being.
By
Rathin Deb, Advisor and retail consultant, currently as Branch Manager, Tower Infotech Ltd
| 06 20 2011 07:53:43 +0000
it is true but science & tech are very much required.
By
K Nageswara rao, Senior.Superintendent-production, Hindustan Petroleum
| 06 18 2011 17:30:54 +0000
Padmaja Baskar, we are missing you
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 18 2011 09:49:54 +0000
Dear KALIYAMOORTHY Thanks for the information, I will certainly study that Site/Debate
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 17 2011 10:32:50 +0000
Hey Mr. Ajay Kumar Kaitan, What you said comes under Complexity Governance( Nature predominantly over ruling our Governance system). There was a debate on this issue sometime back. http://toostep.com/debate/complexity-governance
By
KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed
| 06 17 2011 10:10:04 +0000
DEAR KALIYAMOORTHY We can never tame Nature, but the reverse is true
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANT
| 06 17 2011 08:44:27 +0000
Hey, Taming the Nature to the betterment of a society is what we call as Development. As you say, Hydro power from water, Solar from sun, Wind energy from Wind , Nuclear from Atom are the few derivations that Humanity advanced to society. But, the Production, Operation, Maintenance, Distributions, Supply & use are , all governed by various Regulations, Laws, sometimes unwritten Norms in vogue that warranted. The beneficiary for which it is made is Human-being who are to see that the purpose for which it is intended is used for correctly without causing undue damage to society as envisaged by the various Governing bodies.
By
KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed
| 06 17 2011 08:28:10 +0000
As asked by Mr Rajal Desai I have my own theory, which you will follow easily 1. Motion is the most fundamental Property of this universe 2. The Whole Universe is ROTATING, nothing is stationary 3. The Earth is rotating around the Sun, the Moon rotating around the Earth, the Sun rotating around some bigger star alongwith the whole solar system &... so on.....the Galaxies moving around some bigger Galaxies .........& so on.........no end at all. Pl. note that, we do not add any fuel to either Moon,Earth or Sun to rotate 4. Similarly In Atoms, electrons are moving around the Nucleus for billions of Years & will continue to rorate without any fuel to be added
5. CONCLUSION: Starting from Atom to this Universe, nothing is Standstill, but everything is Rotating, so we conclude that motion is the most fundamental property of this Universe & no external Fuel is required
6. PLEASE NOTE: We don't supply any fuel to the Electrons or the moving Galaxies 7. Based on the above observations, I have designed a machine which will continue to rotate without any fuel
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 06 16 2011 20:04:55 +0000
Your Question: Hope you have taken in consideration of Magnetic Radiations. As already the Mobile Towers and other radio wave application have polluted the environment by electromagnetic radiation. My Answer: Every care is taken, there will be no Electromagnetic or Magnetic Radiation at all
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 06 16 2011 19:38:55 +0000
Hope you have taken in consideration of Magnetic Radiations. As already the Mobile Towers and other radio wave application have polluted the environment by electromagnetic radiation.
By
Rajal Desai, Director = www.bhavyanet.com
| 06 16 2011 19:30:03 +0000
Science is for understanding the Universe & Technology is the Application of Science to make our Life Easier, Comfortable & Safe. If we are spoiling the environment, then certainly we are Misusing the Science & Technology
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 06 16 2011 19:28:25 +0000
Mr Rajal Desai, you are right, I am using Magnets in place of Gravitational Field
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 06 16 2011 19:13:55 +0000
Thanks for this wonderful knowledge, but still I will put up my question. Hope am not pulling you too much. If so you can flatly ignore me. I think you are talking about some magnetic/Kinetic energies. As I know that all the things in motion without any external force has this energy. For Moon and Earth like planets we call Gravitational energy. are you going to use any such form factor to transform?
By
Rajal Desai, Director = www.bhavyanet.com
| 06 16 2011 19:00:02 +0000
Mr Rajal Desai' I must thank you for asking me this fundamental Question, Dear Mr Desai, I have my own theory, which you will follow easily 1. Motion is the most fundamental Property of this universe 2. The Whole Universe is ROTATING, nothing is stationary 3. The Earth is rotating around the Sun, the Moon rotating around the Earth, the Sun rotating around some bigger star alongwith the whole solar system &... so on.....the Galaxies moving around some bigger Galaxies .........& so on.........no end at all. Pl. note that, we do not add any fuel to either Moon,Earth or Sun to rotate 4. Similarly In Atoms, electrons are moving around the Nucleus for billions of Years & will continue to rorate without any fuel to be added
5. CONCLUSION: Starting from Atom to this Universe, nothing is Standstill, but everything is Rotating, so we conclude that motion is the most fundamental property of this Universe & no external Fuel is required
6. PLEASE NOTE: We don't supply any fuel to the Electrons or the moving Galaxies 7. Based on the above observations, I have designed a machine which will continue to rotate without any fuel
By
AJAY KUMAR KHAITAN, Consultant
| 06 16 2011 18:48:05 +0000
Ajay, Wish u great success, as your success is ours. Just out of curiosity From what form of energy your machine would transform to our utility energy requirement like electricity and Transportation ? as per my knowledge, energy can not be produced or generated. You can only transform the energy.
By
Rajal Desai, Director = www.bhavyanet.com
| 06 16 2011 18:10:59 +0000
|
