Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
 
Created by : Alok Kumar Singh, Sr. Associate, UBS  | 11 24 2008 18:33:27 +0000
Industry : Investment BankingFunctional Area : Movers & Shakers(Markets)
Activity:  242 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000
 
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes Vs No
3
 
 
 
 
5
2
4
Support   Support
Top Argument
1
0

Let me first put across certain facts. India is a net importer of capital. Our current account deficit is on the verge of touching 3% of GDP (~$40 billion). To sustain a GDP growth rate of 7%, we require over $300 billion of capital, of which ~$40 billion-50 billion needs to come from external sources. This can flow into India via equity - portfolio flows or FDI - or via borrowings. Foreign investors provide two important elements - capital and international linkages. So they are important.

 


By Alok Kumar Singh, Sr. Associate, UBS  11 24 2008 18:33:27 +0000
 
Top Argument
1
0

FII is mostly for a speculative purpose, they will invest and sell the investment once the see profits.. FII do not add to capital much..

I believe that FDI should be the main source for external capital as it invests into the business and also at times partners in the business and stays invested for a longer term than the FII's..


By Japan Shah, Assistant Professor, Oxford School of Management  06 08 2009 16:13:17 +0000
0
0

Over the past five years, portfolio flows into India have been ~$70 billion. Currently, FIIs hold close to ~17% of Indian market capitalisation versus ~50% with promoters and ~13% with Indian institutional investors. Hence, FIIs are an important institutional investor base for markets. They have brought heterogeneity to our markets (as FIIs come in all colours and shapes), improved governance quality, and made our markets more efficient


By Santosh Bhosle, Associate, IFCI  | 11 24 2008 18:38:41 +0000
1
0

I think FII should not be the main source of external capital for our economy. Forign investment comes in the economy in different shape and size like hedge funds, FDI, FII, etc. As they come in with a huge investment their capital dominance in the market may lead to unfair trade practices where the reatil and small investors are at loss as they cant dominate the market. As we have seen last year the Sensex plunging from high 21k to the lows of 8k, all know the reason behind it the suddeb FII outflow from the market in lieu with the fear of global recession, so it is highly prone to global risk and fears which even does'nt has any correlation with the Indian market.

Secondly, it is difficult to know the sanctity of the funds invested through undisclosed participants eg :  Promissory Notes. As we don't have KYC norms as for the Foreign Investor as we have for National Retail Investor.

Thirdly Hedge funds are one of the bigger players in the markets these days, who has a very high risk return profile. They apply different strategies for their returns which can increase the market volatality whereby increasing the discomfort amongst the small investors who are not so prone to high risk. These hedge funds has the concept of hedging their portfolio through futures.


By Darshil , CEO/MD/Director, Darshil Cotton Company  | 06 04 2009 11:27:12 +0000
0
0

The downside of allowing FII’s  is that they link us to global markets and bring some of the riskier global practices into our markets, as we are experiencing currently. One other route of getting foreign capital would be to allow corporates and foreign individuals to invest directly into our markets. This will add a few more investor categories and make it more heterogeneous. We should also create more categories of local institutional investors in our markets.

 

 


By Ashim Chowdhury, Associate, ICICI Securities  | 11 24 2008 18:40:54 +0000
0
0

The downside of allowing FII’s is that they link us to global markets and bring some of the riskier global practices into our markets, as we are experiencing currently. One other route of getting foreign capital would be to allow corporates and foreign individuals to invest directly into our markets. This will add a few more investor categories and make it more heterogeneous. We should also create more categories of local institutional investors in our markets.


By Varun Sood, Associate, JP MorganChase  | 11 24 2008 18:39:58 +0000
 
Viewers also viewed
it is not ? vs it is?
 
515 referals 10 arguments, 70 views
bad for market vs good for market
 
786 referals 13 arguments, 123 views
I wonder which measure is the best one for measuring the actual return ot the capital being used...
 
0 referals 6 arguments, 1746 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (48)
Though the smaller coins are made vlaue less and printing of these are stopped, the arithmatical...
 
1961 referals 23 arguments, 186 views
Development is always necessary and it needs money. Do you think Padmanabhaswamy temple should...
 
1768 referals 40 arguments, 208 views
with current politicians vs never
 
1684 referals 29 arguments, 272 views
more...  
More From Author
As such there is news of falling stocks daily on the news, There is a saying that one who is faint hearted shouldn't enter the stock market business, the way the stock market goes up and down he surely will be affected, so what to do in such times...
What role do technology / internet / social networks / play in serving professionals in the capital markets?
How according to you we can make sure our business credit is built the “correct” way?
more...