Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 
 
Created by : Vikas Bhatnagar, Manager Finance, Tata Motors Ltd  | 03 19 2010 11:19:08 +0000
Industry : Human Resources (HR) ConsultingFunctional Area : Performance(Corporate Finance)
Activity:  583 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

HR heads of most organisations report to CEO of the company.Would it be better if they start reporting to Chariman Of Audit Committee for better autonomy and transperancy?

 
 Refer 724
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes Vs No
15
 
 
 
 
6
6
4
Support   Support
Top Argument
3
0

I believe HR is a function which should be reporting to indepedent committee instead of Business Heads/ CEO.This will give them more power and independence.Most of the e (may be Audit Committee) .Exit interviews are not taken that seriously as the business dominates over support functions.In Big MNC's ,if a business head is very strong then whatever he does is final and HR donot have much say in that.If a company is a MNC, then HR head can report to Chairman of Audit Committee in head office / HR Head -Reagional office who in turn would report to Audit Committee Chairman.


By Vikas Bhatnagar, Manager Finance, Tata Motors Ltd  03 19 2010 11:19:08 +0000
 
Top Argument
2
0

The role of the Audit committee is overseeing and monitoring the accounting and financial reporting process and Acts as catalyst for effective financial reporting and important component  of best corporate governance practices.

Thus ultimate goal is to restore and retain stakeholders’ confidence by promoting accountability.

It is not the role of the audit committee to Monitor or control other department of the Company like HR.

 


By Subodh A.Soni, Company Secretary, AKWL  03 20 2010 08:43:08 +0000
0
0

Ya. It's so important factor.


By Prabhakar , Software Developer, JMD INFOTECH  | 03 21 2010 05:09:34 +0000
0
0

Thanks for the referral Mr. Vikas Bhatnagar. You are right. The role of HR dept is to select the right candidate for the right job in the organization. Like other depts in an organization, HR is an another dept. Hence the head of HR dept can report to Executive Director or Managing Director or Chairman as the case may be and they are all heads of operations. HR Dept role is very vital since the employees have to contribute for the growth of the companies. Sometimes, the powerful & influential head of business recommends the candidates which may be referred through HR dept. There should be a system in place for the successful of any organization. A small flaw in a sub system will affect the big system as a whole.    


By NATTERAJA R. ARIKRISHNAN, GM-Projects, Bentec Electricals & Electronics Pvt. Ltd  | 03 20 2010 16:00:27 +0000
0
0

It's good suggestion. Overall final decision is depend on managment. It depend on the managment of that particullar organisation. How they respond their auditors? Auditor can suggest to managment but they can't take any managment decision.


By Omkar Kulkarni, Accounts Officer, Minilec(India) Pvt Ltd  | 03 20 2010 15:08:54 +0000
0
0

Business functions always dominates over support functions. ALL support functions are (unfortunately) led to a secondary role. This includes not only HR but also IS, MS Quality etc.

Problem however will be that all goals of all departments will have to align to the company business goals. The business goals are set by the CEO. Having an independent reporting to an autonomous Audit Board will make it difficult. The Audit Board can monitor the functions and targets vrs achievements. This, in the case of HR is non-tangible as against Sales, Production etc. and may require deeper appreciation that the CEO with an eye on targets may not appreciate.

But who does the Audit Committee report to if not the CEO? An audit board can only provide a second level of buffer between the service provider and the CEO, but the final word is not with the Audit Board.

CEOs ned to have a beyyer appreciation of the extent of support that is given by service groups.


By V. Srinivas, Freelancer, Information Technology  | 03 20 2010 10:07:23 +0000
1
0

Vikas interesting issue for debating.

I agree with you, it would be better it they report to audit committee. Because this will improve the quality and integrity of the Company’s accounting and reporting practices. There are many big companies who provide a confidential, anonymous method for you to contract the Audit Committee with concerns regarding accounting, controls or auditing matters. So I think HR department should go for this.

:)  


By Priyanka Dixit, HR Executive, Leading IT services  | 03 20 2010 08:38:12 +0000
0
0

Priyank, HR department is a corner of a tringular relationship. Other two corners r ceo & the managers (management) of the company. Compnies growth depends on so many factors but the key factor is relationship.HR department conveys the message of MD or ceo to the management . In this matter reporting to audit department directly may harm to the interest of  the company.


By Debasish Dutta, Sales Head, R.H.Automobiles Pvt Ltd  | 03 21 2010 19:16:53 +0000
0
0

I dont agree for reporting to Audit team...

as Purpose of both are different and will not give any Value addition to the Organisation as an whole.... The reason being.... HR as an Individual Dept has got Independant functionability and shud report to CEOs and top guys as the CEOs and all are overall responsible for Proper functioning, growth and overall aspects of day to day operational activities and growing aspects to achieve ORGANISATIONAL GOAL.... Its finally those ppls who has hold and can understand IMPORTANCE OF INDIVIDUAL PERSONS GROWTH and THEREFORE COMPANYS growth.... and in Sharehonlders perspective they are the one who has Responsibility for offering better return to shareholders... and not the Audit team..

So reporting to Auidt team will not help HR to get Recognition in an Organization and to improve the Smooth Functionability....


By Sampanna Shastry, Deputy Manager- Marketing & Sales, Arani Power Systems Ltd  | 03 20 2010 12:16:00 +0000
0
0

I completely agree with Subodh. Auditing is an expensive process to maintain stake holder confidence in the organization. It is simply the means to ensure that the company is financially sound and is following the industry standards for accounting and book keeping. Human Resource is an internal function of the organization, one that the organization is not accountable for to any external authority and one that the external stakeholders are least interested in. Auditing it therefore will be an expensive investment with no foreseeable returns.


By Amit Singh, Business Analyst, Amdocs,  | 03 20 2010 10:48:24 +0000
Leading Recruitment firm
Leading Recruitment firm
Viewers also viewed
It is a general situation everywhere. Employee attrition is on rise with companies losing their...
 
1066 referals 41 arguments, 1761 views
Today all the employers have few words when we ask them about pay : best in industry ,...
 
2160 referals 9 votes, 551 views
Even though half of the 3,00,000 engineers India produces every year are women, it is a sad but...
 
825 referals 6 votes, 915 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (4)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 97 views
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 482 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
more...  
More From Author
Mr Vivek...Hope you realise that there is a big difference between a common man and a celebrity / industrial icon....If you understand this thing,you would not have wriiten such a thing...
I believe,it is a must for growth...in my words in most of the orgns esp in MNC's Bina jugaad ke patta nahin hilta.....there are organisations where you move every 2 years/specific period to a new role...the internal openings which come are always...
No way...Pls continue to post your valuable inputs.It gives a different direction of thinking...
more...