Yes, at a second stage. most important in the first is that everybody must be conscious about the following "Be the change you want to see in the world".
By
d. prasanna, Lecturer, Law College
| 12 17 2009 10:26:47 +0000
May be revamp is not the right word, but everybody in the debate is ready to fight against terrorism. So it's good to see that..
Thou Change is required, let's follow the points- 1) Learnings from past experiences 2) Change in political structure 3) Immediate attention and action by general public 4) Fight against corruption 5) Revamp the whole system, rather then revamping the laws 6) Tight Surveillance There should be an online forum for Public to raise their concerns and points like these to our Prime Minister, so that any actions should be carried out.. after all it's democracy and we have the right to speech !! Thanks everyone for your views..!
By
Satwinder Singh, Program Manager, Confidential
| 09 03 2009 08:44:51 +0000
India needed a stringent law since last 20 years. But, for the psudo secularistic charector of some politicians in power, the same has failed to achieve. For the reason of untold political compulsion, of some parties, the innocent civilians have been the worst sufferers. The people behind defending all the proposals, for a tough central legislation on terrorism, have remained, very well protected, from the best armed security service of this country. Should these people live asside their stake for state security and allowed to move like those of the common citizen, then, they would realise the need for the wanted toughest law on terrorism. As the politicians have always been identifying religion with their politics, the proposal for the captioned law is reminding their vote bank stretegies. Thanks.
By
Sanjib Kumar Dash, Advocate., Lawyer/Attorney, Self Employed as a Law Practiomer ( Advocate )
| 07 28 2009 16:22:28 +0000
yes. we need it, but politician & government officials entering any wise through corruption, all laws goes only against innocents and also original culprits will be escaped with decent manner. So, we must make serious punishments for anti- corruption. After that only we can success in our goal. First of all we must identify friends of the nation and enemies of our national colour people.
By
vivekanandan , Bad Debts/Workouts Manager, finance company
| 01 22 2009 11:42:53 +0000
According to me India should revamp its anti terrorism laws and give more power to the police and others on thorough interrogation procedures and the law should be more stringent, POTA should be brought back empowered with new sections which will empower the anti terrorism law, or borrow the versions of other countries like UK and US which has more stringent anti-terrorism laws..
By
Prathamesh Toraskar, Legal Consultant
| 12 02 2008 13:00:47 +0000
|
I think we already have enough laws. Our problem is not a lack of laws, but a lack of will. After the 26/11, the government announced grandiose schemes for enhancing security. But what was achieved in reality? Very little. Then the Pune blast occurred. When will it stop? It will stop only when we become capable of retaliating these terror strikes. No amount of pleading with Pakistan or the US will enhance our security against terrorists. We have to build up the capability. When anything happens, we simply blame Pakistan. Is Pakistan so capable of blasting our backyard? Or are we pathetically incapable? So our attitudes have to change. We must stand up and fight for our security. Nobody else will protect us, we have to do it.
By
Prof TKG Namboodhiri, Director, Metallurgical Consultancy
| 03 22 2010 14:09:02 +0000
Indian Parliament and the state legislatures have a record of enacting numerous outdated laws, the plight of which is not very difficult to comprehend. Most of them are either facing dust for the lack of proper implementation, or are facing a trial for their survival in the courts. In turn, ultimately overburdening the judiciary, which instead of serving the very cause of people, keeps on looking into the constitutional conflicts and securing the very features of the same. So, the dilemma is much more complicated then it looks like. What one can suggest, is a single, proper, uniform law which has a uniform implementation throughout the country, which in turn thwarts both the very possibility of coming in tatters with any state law and the need of proper implementation. Terrorism is a uniform effort of creating fear in the minds of humans which targets the whole humanity in general and in order to curb the very efforts of the same, only a uniform action can guarantee protection.
By
siddharth mathur, Student, KIIT University
| 09 03 2009 15:08:39 +0000
I think instead of revamping, we should first implement an existing law strictly. The problem in our country is, we just make laws and hardly work on it. Just of an example, in the Kandahar aeroplane hacking case in December 1999, we released a terrorist for the life of few hundred hostages for imprisonment of whom, many thousands of soldiers gave their life. Whenever this type of case occurs, our government kneels down in front of the terrorists. This is not right. I believe we should implement the law in which, when you know a man is terrorist, there is no meaning in carrying out any case on him rather he should be immediately hanged/shot or else, his friends will again hijack some aeroplane and demand his freedom. But we are of very soft nature because of which Daud is maintaining all his activities of Mumbai, right from Karachi and Abu Salem is standing in the UP elections...What a shame !!!
By
Sarika Singh, Assistant Professor, BIT
| 09 03 2009 06:43:33 +0000
The laws instead of revamping should be repealed. It is high tim,e for us to learn from the TADA and POTA experience
By
Akash , Lawyer/Attorney, HRLN
| 09 03 2009 03:52:07 +0000
No, the laws need not be revamped as the laws are enough to fight.. the thing which has to be changes is the commitment of the politicians and the attitude of general public. What can be changed is the way thetrails take place, we can see that the prime accuse of the parliament attact is still not been convicted . . So laws are in place but what is need is the commitment to execute them well...
By
Japan Shah, H.O.D, Oxford School of Management
| 04 20 2009 18:37:55 +0000
I think the forefathers of pakistan have given the feeling of
separatism but not given the tools of survival to their community...
hence there is every reason to follow the path of terrorism for their
survival and India is found very easy and closed to them for this
operation... Since they have no reliability therefore no body/country
can offer helping hands for their up gradation. I found they are at
their worst condition of living because they have no means and
character of reliability so that any body can offer them for their up
gradation.....
By
Santosh Dwivedi, Media N' Marketing
| 12 03 2008 06:37:59 +0000
No it doesn't need any revamp as such there should be more strong political will rather than anything, terrorists have been arrested before and in shocking incident due to the lack of adequate proofs were granted bail only to indulge in similar activities against the people, once again, It doesn't need any revamp, but the complete revamp should be done how the country runs, its system and policies against terrorism which needs to be prioritized right now.....
By
Mukund Arankalle, Corporate Lawyer
| 12 02 2008 13:24:39 +0000
|