Should Mercy Killing be allowed in India?

Ill person can live its last days of life more joyfully,if he/she knows that there is a way for him to emergency exit from his condition(which is un treatable)through mercy killing

Though I don't know wheather it's right or wrong but I would say one thing ......that think about a person to whom we are so involved & just can't help him by any way & we know the most  possible result also, then should we keep on watching that someone who is very near & dear to us suffering with untreatable problem & is in intolerable pain.  And we should not allow him to mearcy death just bcoz we are not god.

This is true we are not god.

But Think about huminity & emotions in real sence.

If death penalty is allowed in india then why mercy killing should be prohibited.

Most of the developed country have euthanasia legalized but there system of treatment and record process are much more open to public debate.

It is not always bad to keep few options open when there are so many life conditions which need a third dimension.

In India if we need to legalize euthanasia then it would be better to keep this issue under the control of judiciary as single handed control over its use may exploit its primary concern.

There are so many other dimensions which require open public debate to approve its usage in future.

Yes, can be considered in case the individual ( patient ) is unable to bear the terminal illness and provided his/her pains & suffering cannot be treated by any other possible means. All legal obligations should be considered and a law for Eutanasia should be made.

according to my opinion mercy killing should be allowed in india for those people who is suffering from danger deases. The pepole who are involved in terror attack would not be allowed in this procedure because they dont thik about huminity then why we people show huminity towards that people.For the terrorist there should be a tough law to kill immediately in india like other countries or follow on the track of israiel. 

Yes it should be allowed but for those who are suffering from prolonged disease. 

The concerns raised by many of you not to legalise mercy killing is justifiable. But please appreciate the fact that mercy killing should be permitted where the patient doesn't respond to treatment and is in a vegetative state as the patient cannot be recuperated back to a acceptable living condition. Further the patient cannot communicate his / her suffering and has to bear the pain and suffering.  

It is a very important that adequate measures are taken to safeguard patient's interest before permitting euthanasia. Therefore a medical team should assess and justify every euthanasia before the competent body can order the processess.

Is the idea of seeing your near and dear one on a ventillator a good one??

Is the idea of seeing the agony and the pain in the eyes and hearing the moans of your near and dear ones a good one??

I am for MERCY KILLING to purely end the agony and give the soul the much needed freedom from relentless pain, medication and the constant piercing of body for tests. I am completely for it and I have been incidental in authorising one in my family. No remorse. Extreme sadness but also very happy to see that there is no pain and agony anymore. No endless waits and above all NO FALSE HOPES!!

I think it should be allowed and if there is no cure at all or there is no scope of development and in today's days where the hospitals costs being on the higher side, and if patient themselves are asking for it, then euthanasia should be allowed. And remember one thing people, they are alive just because they are in the hospital and if they are not treated and if they are outside then it will be not possible to live, so there is nothing wrong in this. Its just that his or her body is not supporting and than suffering for a longer period with no scope of improvement in their condition, then one  can opt for this euthanasia.

Yes this could be allowed under certain circumstances that if the doctor is sure that there is no scope for the patient to get well in future, then it may be allowed taking the consent of that patient but if there is a little bit of scope left then the patient should be provided that time. But for those people who are terminally ill and those patients whose family really can’t afford the cost of the treatment for such a long period then it’s really ok to grant their appeal for euthanasia as a solution.