Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  4 of 11 in Topic  Next >>
 

Should President's rule be imposed in Karnataka??

Created by : Neelima Pandey, PR & Media Relations Manager, Group M  | 10 12 2010 10:30:23 +0000
Industry : Radio, TV & FilmsFunctional Area : Politics(Personal Interests)
Keywords : bsy bs yedyurappa karnataka government crisis bjp crisis in karnataka president's rule should president's rule be imposed in karnataka? b.s.yedyurappa
Activity:  282 views;  last activity : 10 22 2010 12:48:42 +0000

After all the drama that is unfolding in Karnataka Government, where the Governor is now asking to take the test once again, but in the mean time, he has also told the president of India to take care of things by asking for a Presidents Rule in Karnataka for the time being, and if that happens, then democracy has failed and Politicians are taking the people of karnataka granted, where ugly phase of politics is unfolding at the moment, it is like an all time low for Indian politics, where money is ruling over everything....

Should President's Rule be imposed in Karnataka??

  
 Refer 895
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes Vs No
7
 
 
 
 
21
6
12
Support   Support
Top Argument
1
1

There is total chaos there at the moment, I think it has got to do with the CM's inability to handle things properly, the matter should not have been escalated like this, they should have dabbed it before getting it out of control like this, now it all looks like a big joke out there, and issues like this fails to create a strong impression of Democracy in India of which these politicians hail it like anything, infact there is no strong leadership in Karnataka after SM Krishna finished his term where he took Bangalore to all the next level and made the city's mark at the global level, after that its all been chaos there, with coalition governments taking shape time and again, even now its the same, I don't know how people of that state are reacting for this...but in next elections they should clearly vote for single party and not like this where there is no clear result to form a government....but at the moment President's rule should happen, if not we will be see even worse in the coming days....


By Amrita , Animation/Graphic Artist, Creative design  10 12 2010 12:23:56 +0000
 
Top Argument
2
0

No, there should be no President's rule, if that happens then the Democracy has failed in the place, also the ugly fight for power should stop, why all of a sudden all these 20 MLA's decided to leave BJP, its bad politics game being played by other parties in the state, it should be like during elections a clear majority should be there and a rightful party forms the government and not fighting it out like this, and there should be no President's rule according to me. It's high time that PM intervenes here and does something, also all BJP members should get their acts right.
By Neelima Pandey, PR & Media Relations Manager, Group M  10 12 2010 10:37:31 +0000
0
0

President`s rule for a while and elections soon after will bring in a stable govt.
By s.baalu , Consultant, XYZ LTD  | 10 22 2010 12:24:07 +0000
0
0
yes it should be to control some things
By adarsh t r, journalism student  | 10 20 2010 18:18:00 +0000
0
0

argument if favou of no

no president's rule
By Apeksha , IT/Technical Editor,  | 10 20 2010 08:18:33 +0000
0
0

I feel President's rule for a while will bring things to a better shape than they're currently in. Talking about democracy, it already failed in Karnataka as the govt is dissolved. Another coalition govt will fall apart in no time. Prez rule for a while might get people back to basics.
By Bharath reddy, Software Developer, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS)  | 10 18 2010 12:11:18 +0000
0
0
In fighting within the ruling party, and lack of clear leadership has brought the entire administrative machinery to a stand still. So President's rule is the only alternative
By Shashi Kumar U, Manager accounts & commercial, Mazda Concrete Products Pvt Ltd  | 10 18 2010 03:57:54 +0000
0
0

Dear Amrita,

There is an elected Government with majority support of a single part vs a collection of destabilising elements from various parties. Even if this Government disturbed there is absolutely no hope for the destabilitisers to form agovernment.

As for SM Krishna statement, his party clearly failed in getting majority is this without his contribution?

As for Indecision, There are many happening right at center, what would you suggest?
By Ravindra Sharma, Managing Consultant, CHEF-India  | 10 23 2010 05:41:41 +0000
0
0

No... The Assembly must be dissolved forthwith... Fresh elections to be held within the next 3 months... This is the only way to save democracy and stop horse trading...
By Suryanarayan Murthy, Asst Vice President (Corporate Finance), A Hydro Power Project  | 10 22 2010 12:48:42 +0000
0
0

I agree with you Neelima, any elected government should allowed to be function Normally to the full term & should not be disturbed by President Rule, unless the govt. collapse on its own.

Here in Karnataka the scenario is different. The most corrupt parties like Congress & JDS is playing a money game in order to bring down the present government. It is a right thing to disqualify the MLA's who has defected in between.  Here both these parties has acted in a haste, & insist that these MLA's can be disqualified after  voting.

Anti-defection Law has to be enacted so that these croon's does not play spoilt politics & make mockery of Democracy.  The time has come that people should revolt against such Money & Muscle Politics. By acting in such haste, the Governor has brought a sense of shame to the Central Govt & Congress Party, which could not win a single seat in recently held  Assembly By-Election in Karnataka.

It was very clear that when the present Governor was appointed to Karnataka with a motive to act against the elected govt. & help the JDS-CONG. parties to come to power by back door entry, by adopting un-democratic means.

BJP leadership take note of these developments & stop internal fighting in Karnataka BJP and ensure a proper Leadership in the State, so that, they can concentrate on development work.
By nagesh rao, Freelancer, Freelancer  | 10 21 2010 02:46:13 +0000
0
0
No need for imposing article 356.very common political situation which may happen in any state or even in center.worrying thing is the attitude of Governor who is very much interested in imposing prez.rule.all political parties should at least have a simple common sense to know for what purpose they have been elected rather than striving for might.dissident MLA's from BJP shows there real colours and i feel speakers decision on their disqualification is correct.
By jairaj shyam prasad, Production Manager, BOSCH Ltd  | 10 20 2010 15:28:26 +0000
0
0

BAN CONG(I) AND JDS FOR HORSE TRADING AND KIDNAPPING
By shivanand shenoy, self employed, siddhi  | 10 18 2010 07:27:59 +0000
0
0
Let the people of Karnataka act
By Vaibhav Vora, B.Com student, University of Mumbai  | 10 13 2010 06:59:07 +0000
0
0
I believe in military rule...
By Chandra shekhar, Technical Writer/Quality Assurance, CMMI 3 Software Company, Hyderabad  | 10 13 2010 06:15:44 +0000
0
0

No. Not at all required.  The ambitious leaders within BJP and JD(U) are making the things worse.  It seems  the Raj Bhavan, Karnataka is putting its fingers in.  Yadyurappa, the CM is humble but not that efficient to handle these nonsense.  A strong leadership who can go offensively against these nonsense creators is required.
By Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.  | 10 13 2010 05:28:19 +0000
0
0
No, i think there is no need of president's rule.
By Sharad Gupta, Software Developer, Tripura Technologies, Hyderabad  | 10 12 2010 11:17:22 +0000
0
0

I support your views, Neelima.Such incidence diluting values of Democracy.
By Diwakar Tiwari, Sr. Manager, THE Arvind LTD  | 10 12 2010 11:13:04 +0000
0
0

I support your views, Neelima. But I don't think that this BJP Govt will last long due to their internal politics.

It is purely depend upon the decision of President to do the neutral judgment.
By SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd  | 10 12 2010 10:46:34 +0000
Argue for "Yes"
Argue for "No"
 Found the debate "Should President's rule be imposed in Karnataka?? "  interesting ?  Suggest to your connections and communities  
 
Viewers also viewed
 
202 referals 3 votes, 135 views
India vs China
 
218 referals 7 arguments, 696 views
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/70-of-milk-in-Delhi-country-is-adulterated/articleshow/...
 
2506 referals 27 arguments, 613 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (5)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 97 views
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 502 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
more...  
Sponsored Jobs
More From Author
Congress hints US hand in Anna Hazare!! How low can they go?
Awesome . Thoughtful and wonderful . Simple ways to nurture great minds.
Green is a soothing colour and it emits some positive energy. This study is a fact we have observed many a times but do not give it much importance.
more...