Why not Sheetal? Was 19 years not enough for making her realise her crime? With the pace Indian system works, the case would never get closed. Yes, every crime has a punishment attached to it but the only thing we donot attach is the time limit to conclude the case. I seriously feel that in case the police, jail authorities and the effected agree, she should b FREED - yes with condions attached if the need be.
By
Navjeet Sood, Business Head, ADI Media Pvt Ltd
| 02 19 2010 11:52:26 +0000
I think yes she should be freed. She has already paid for her deeds for 19 years as she admitted. Moreover, the prohibition officer has already said that Nalini has shown a good conduct. We also should see her condition. She has a daughter whose father also has been sentenced to death. I think seeing all these situation and thinking of her daughter's future, she should be freed.
By
Himanshu Pathak, Sr/Principal Coresspondent, Coresspondent
| 01 23 2010 08:56:55 +0000
|
NO..IF THEY DID SOME THING WROMG ..THEY MUST BE PUNISHED ACCORDING TO THIER CRIME...THERE MUST BE NO COMPROMISE ..OR EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENTS TO CRIMINALS..IF SHE DID WRONG..SHE HAVE TO SUFFER..N IF THERE IS A QUESTION OF HER DAUGHTER OR HUSBAND ..SO SHE KNEW IT VERY WELL THAT SHE IS IN A JAIL..IT WAS HER DESICION TO GAVE BIRTH TO HER CHILD ...SO DOSN'T MATTER ...SHE SHOUD NOT BE RELEASED.
By
sheetal rawat, News Anchor/TV Presenter, Mh1 News
| 02 19 2010 10:40:49 +0000
Let the court decide, whether she has to be set free. These are polictical gimmics and making it an issue. This thing was not raised till now and suddenly the Politicians are remembering her and going to meet her in jail, this is just to get political millage... Please let the court decide...
By
Japan Shah, H.O.D, Oxford School of Management
| 01 27 2010 18:51:49 +0000
Let the law decide on this one. There can be no fair justice when politics get mixed with the law. It was intent to kill. One should consider that the ex- prime minister's life was snuffed out. I am sure the lady in question knew that once caught she would have to face the brunt of the law. She should have thought of her daughter before committing this terrible act. I have no sympathy for terrorists.
By
Devi Kaladeen, Audit Manager, Health Sector Development Unit
| 01 26 2010 04:43:08 +0000
If it is about emotion..Then I do not know what to say..it's debatable. But whatever the reason may be. One sentenced to death should not be freed for any emotion. That's mockery of constitution. If you are aginst life sentence..then change the law. But do not change the verdict.
By
Sayan Chakraborty, Senior ERP Consultant, International Business machines
| 01 25 2010 19:24:00 +0000
Not at all! Whatever her problems may be. But fact is fact. She is a terrorist who killed our ex-prime minister. It was Sonia Gandhi's greatness that she took pity and reduced her punishment. But if we still take this case lightly, then terrorists will get confidence of attacking important leaders of our country. Already we are famous as a tolerant nation because of which, we have been paying a lot. If still we don't show intolerance, attacks on us will increase in future years. So, I think, Nalini should never be freed.
By
Kavitha Shankar, Sr/Principal Coresspondent, ABC
| 01 22 2010 11:12:23 +0000
|