Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
 

should we need to divide the lower category into Poors & Rich personolities?

Created by : Iranna , MCA student, karnatakuniversity  | 06 30 2011 11:49:55 +0000
Keywords : should we need to divide the lower category into poors & rich personolities?
Activity:  399 views;  last activity : 07 26 2011 11:52:09 +0000
 
 Refer 1832
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes. Poor (lower category) needs to get benefits of govt Vs No. Should get all benefits
15
 
 
 
 
11
11
9
Support   Support
 
Top Argument
2
0
What is the point and what benefit will they get. How clear are you about the strategy you are talking about? I do not see dividing this group into two categories again..
By Kavitha Shankar, Sr/Principal Coresspondent, ABC  07 01 2011 11:18:10 +0000
0
0
I want to support yes, as it may helps the people below poverty line.
By SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd  | 07 26 2011 11:52:08 +0000
0
0
The poor r getting too many benefits without enough effort. It's not fair.
By neha singh, Content Editor, Avestia Corp  | 07 13 2011 08:42:01 +0000
0
0
Will we stop dividing ? Life is a division which has always some remainder.We should plan for collective improvement of nation,each one getting benefit from the expertise of others.
By Ranjeet Kumar, B.Tech Mech. Engg,Kurukshetra University  | 07 11 2011 15:12:33 +0000
0
0
Yes of course, unless the conditional jeopardy will continue and we will have to witness more suicides and cases of self ablaze.
By Ardhendu Pal, Upgrading Knowledge Base, Researching in Computer Software/Hardware  | 07 11 2011 14:57:57 +0000
0
0

 

The answer is in your question itself. Why otherwise the classification of "Lower Category" meaning that there are "Upper catogories".

Inequality in one form or other is the order of the naute in all its creations. Humanity should try to reduce the ineqality in social structructure while improving the conditions leading to it universally for all.
By P. Abraham Paul, MD FCOMNET  | 07 11 2011 04:57:05 +0000
0
0

Yes, otherwise, we are all in for the benefits. Its the poorest of the poor who needs the most and not even the lower lower middle class - sorry for that extra categorization.

However, just categorization wont be of help if the benefits actually leaks in between during its journey to the 'POOR MAN'. The govt. first needs to organize this sector before undertaking such programmes.
By Saibal Ray, Sr. Process Engineer, KPIT Cummins Infosystems  | 07 02 2011 09:43:44 +0000
0
0
hello Kavitha,yes,today there is a need to divide lower category into poor,poorer& rich.facilities should reach only for needy and not for all!why well to do lower category person should get free everything just for being in that category?
By jairaj shyam prasad, Production Manager, BOSCH Ltd  | 07 01 2011 15:03:30 +0000
0
0
I still do not not understand what is the relevancy of dividing - and the topic doesnt make sense at all
By sunayana banwari, CEO/MD/Director, Suntech Data Services  | 07 01 2011 12:39:41 +0000
0
0
The title is little bit confusing. The two words "lower category" in the title is causing the trouble. Is to categorise the people into two the poor and the rich so as to target the poor allowing them to get the benefits intended for them in various schemes. Ofcourse, they are aimed at poor, but they are being diverted because of the loopholes in the system. The needy are not getting any benefit the middlemen are getting them.
By Srinivas suravajhala, Asst. Manager.  | 07 01 2011 12:16:00 +0000
0
0
Basically poors of lower category r not getting benefits from the govt. So this is best way of dividing the poors & rich (wealthy) person. So the rich personolities should not gain the poors money...Idea works when poors gets educated and fight against the wealthy or rich people
By Iranna , MCA student, karnatakuniversity  | 06 30 2011 11:49:55 +0000
0
0

Kavitha I agree with you and feel all should get benefit.
By Rathin Deb, Freelance Retail Consultant  | 07 05 2011 08:53:20 +0000
0
0
Actually the two categories are only benefited most than the affected middle class. Free, etc schemes are availed by poor categories, the Top level are availing Free for Agri, Agri Loan, SSI, EMIM loan, OCC loan, etc are availed by them. Do you know who is mostly benefited the total waive off the Agri loan, ie.Minister G.K.Vasan, CHidambaram, and other politicians are availing more Agri loans than others.
By Paul Sureshkumar, Manager, Selvan Marketing  | 07 02 2011 09:29:40 +0000
0
0
I think we already have that system...people comes under poverty line do have benefits in every areas like food grains, reservation for jobs etc..etc. what further can we split that? I thin the more we differentiate more corruption will increase.
By Rohit Thakur, Electrical Engineer-Industrial, Quality Engineering and Software Technologies  | 07 02 2011 04:10:43 +0000
0
0
LET US NOT FORGET THE ECONOMIC TERM WELFARE STATE. WELFARE THE YARDSTICK DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHO IS POOR AND RICH. THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF ANY ECONOMY IS WHAT TO PRODUCE HOW TO PRODUCE AND FINALLY TO WHOM TO PRODUCE. KAVITA THANKS FOR THE REFERRAL.
By sudhakar , BUSINESS CONSULTANT  | 07 01 2011 15:46:36 +0000
0
0
????????????????????
By SHRIKANT MANOHAR DANKE, Project Manager, Phadnis Infrastructur Ltd  | 07 01 2011 14:14:17 +0000
0
0
I still do not not understand what is the relevancy of dividing - and the topic doesnt make sense at all
By sunayana banwari, CEO/MD/Director, Suntech Data Services  | 07 01 2011 12:39:38 +0000
0
0

We have BPL (Below Poverty Line) . I think, this criteria can be used for economically backward people. I believe Govt aims all subsidies, concession, monitory benefits etc based on this.

Thanks for referral Ms Kavitha Shankar.
By KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed  | 07 01 2011 12:17:24 +0000
0
0
Kavitha ji, thanks for referral. Ideally, as Iranna suggested, the division is necessary to extend benefits for poor. However, the question in everyone's mind is the allocated money in terms of subsidies, schemes are reaching in toto to the "so called" beneficiaries! Unless and until, we have foolproof system to establish that, categorization and stratification will have no meaning!
By S. Muralidharan, Executive Director, Knowledge Foundation & Campus Around the Corner  | 07 01 2011 11:53:25 +0000
Argue for "Yes. Poor (lower category) needs to get benefits of govt"
Argue for "No. Should get all benefits"
 Found the debate "should we need to divide the lower category into Poors & Rich personolities?"  interesting ?  Suggest to your connections and communities  
Leading executive search firm
  • Create a confidential Career Profile and Resume/C.V. online
  • Get advice for planning their career and for marketing of experience and skills
  • Maximize awareness of and access to the best career opportunities
Viewers also viewed
not necessary vs necessary
 
731 referals 34 arguments, 457 views
with current politicians vs never
 
1684 referals 30 arguments, 1177 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (5)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 97 views
These days as I switch on the tv or radio or look at a hoarding I do feel that power of ads I...
 
3004 referals 23 arguments, 492 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
more...  
Sponsored Jobs
More From Author
Money provides happiness till it is there with us. so when u spend money then u'll get happiness. The mentality works only when money is there. When money is not there can't we have happinesss? why not...? V can hav it without the money. but Money does...
more...  
  • Popular Knowledge
  •  
  •  
  • Popular Jobs
  •