Money in relation ship

I AGREE WITH RENNE.  MISUNDERSTANDING DOES BREAK RELATIONSHIPS, IT'S NOT ALWAYS MONEY THAT BREAKS THE RELATIONSHIPS.  IF THERE IS A GOOD RELATIONSHIP EXISTS BETWEEN 2 PERSONS, THEN, I THINK, MONEY IS THE FARTHEST REASON TO CREATE FISSURE BETWEEN TWO PERSONS.

OF COURSE MONEY PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN OUR DAILY LIVES, IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT, WE SHOULD MAKE MONEY A REASON OF FORMING A FISSURE IN RELATIONSHIPS. WE ARE NOT GONNA TAKE MONEY EITHER TO HEAVEN OR HELL AFTER DEATH....LIFE IS ALL ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS, HUMAN BEING CANNOT SURVIVE EVEN WITHOUT A SINGLE RELATIONSHIP.

money is not oly breaking the relationship,other reason is also their to break the relationship,ego,people misunderstanding each other also will break the relationships.......

i think for relationship onething  must be required ........and that is  understanding........money helps us to survive  a healthy life with our family .........money is important but not every thing....

I think money is a tool that can be utilised to counter many evils such as poverty and unemployment, by being a means to bring in opportunity.  And let rich people enjoy being endowed with money, it is none of their fault. Rich people can see opportunities the way better than the average, that is the reason which is why they are rich. It does take better insights and hard work in a proper direction too, to make use of an opportunity.

Also, some risk!
Now, just suggest risk to people, and 99 per cent of people will be averse to it. The reason being, they can not invest the hard earned money in an unknown quest. Nobody can blame them either. Most of them do not even try to increase the awareness level, investigate the chances of success.   Now, if you do not trust the rich person's words, don't try to reason out and don't find out facts; how can the rich person be blamed for your failure? 

Association with bankrupt people also increases passimism. May be that is the reason why rich people spend most of their time in the company of similarly successful people.  And let us be honest with ourselves ; does a rich person want his poor frined to always remain poor?    I think he tries dissociate only when all his reasoning fails to bring out the porr friend out of shell.

Money can not be blamed.  Do you want everybody to be poor in order to remain friendly?  Just think, how ridiculous the idea itself is.

Though money is important money is not everything. Money is only instrument of exchange. Nobody can buy love, faith. Love & faith is important for any relationship.

NO.... relationship is based on trust and love.. if money becomes a disturbing matter then there is no relationship. and as i believe.. no one should get bothered by money gone and recieved, it is a universal thing like a currency note in economy, which comes and goes but never stays with you forever... so better care for the relationship than money...

Money is not important in building a healthy and powerful relation. Relations are built on trust, care, harmony, and mutual understanding. All these human emotions play an important role to build a relation. Then how would money influence to build or strengthen a relationship? Money is important only to posess materialistic comforts but not for building and strengthening relationships in life. 

Money in relation ship bank gives hope inside of our family members and it has the simple property to buy things and make use of it. On the other hand it will not break relationship it just reduce the hope quality on us sometimes it may leads to breaking but this is not all the time. In relationship, its purely depends upon how they understand and its not only matter of money and its between hearts and minds. Not that easy to break the true relationship and the trust. If if breaks coz of money we can conclude that the relationship is not based on trust, love and care and it has been made up of only money.

u r right Renne

I do agree with this. Money is not the culprit. It is the thought process of people about that makes/breaks relationship. For example, suppose somebody is convinced that rich people make money in fishy ways, a distance between him/her and the rich will be created, no matter what.  Similarly, if a suddenly rich person starts thinking that being rich implies superiority, then also there is a chance of relationship collapse.    How can one blame something which is a tool, and doesnt have a mind of its own to decide, or act?  In that case, it is not responsible for the consequence either.

We live simultaneously in two different worlds—one where social norms prevail, and the other where market norms make the rules. The social norms include the friendly requests that people make of one another. Could you help me move this couch? Could you help me change this tire? Social norms are wrapped up in our social nature and our need for community. They are usually warm and fuzzy. Instant paybacks are not required: you may help move your neighbor's couch, but this doesn't mean he has to come right over and move yours. It's like opening a door for someone: it provides pleasure for both of you, and reciprocity is not immediately required.

The second world, the one governed by market norms, is very different. There's nothing warm and fuzzy about it. The exchanges are sharp-edged: wages, prices, rents, interest, and costs-and-benefits. Such market relationships are not necessarily evil or mean—in fact, they also include self-reliance, inventiveness, and individualism—but they do imply comparable benefits and prompt payments. When you are in the domain of market norms, you get what you pay for—that's just the way it is. When we keep social norms and market norms on their separate paths, life hums along pretty well. Take sex, for in-the cost of social norms stance. We may have it free in the social context, where it is, we hope, warm and emotionally nourishing. But there's also market sex, sex that is on demand and that costs money. This seems pretty straightforward. We don't have husbands (or wives) coming home asking for a $50 trick; nor do we have prostitutes hoping for everlasting love.

When social and market norms collide, trouble sets in. Take sex again. A guy takes a girl out for dinner and a movie,and he pays the bills. They go out again, and he pays the bills once more. They go out a third time, and he's still springing for the meal and the entertainment. At this point, he's hoping for at least a passionate kiss at the front door. His wallet is getting perilously thin, but worse is what's going on in his head: he's having trouble reconciling the social norm (courtship) with the market norm (money for sex). On the fourth date he casually mentions how much this romance is costing him. Now he's crossed the line. Violation! She calls him a beast and storms off. He should have known that one can't mix social and market norms—especially in this case—without implying that the lady is a tramp.

Not only in the present world, but, right from the days of its inception, money had always been the cause of making or breaking relationships, whether it is family or friends or business relations.

Rather not only the money, even valuables, like gold or silver, had been the cause of making or breaking of relationships even much before the inception of money. You may like to explore the reason of a highway robber of Uttrakhand, northern India, becoming a saint and later known as Valmiki in 400 BC.

You may be wondering, WHY I AM SAYING NO when I have considered the money as the cause of making or breaking of the relations? IT IS BECAUSE, your question refers to only the PRESENT day world and NOT the world right from the inception of money after the barter system was abolished. In fact money had always been the major cause of making or breaking the mutual relations of human beings, may it be the business world or individual family members or friends.

People vary,their priorities vary.Its ultimately an individual's choice.Money may come and money may go but the relationship is one which goes through your thick and thins.

Dear Santhosh,

Money is not the only consideration to make or break a relationship. While it is one of the factors on a scale of 1-10, I would rate money's is role at 4.

Dear Pradeep ,

Even poor people have egos ! You can see in a government office what an important man the peon is !

Ego can come from any source - education , money , fame , position , ...

If it plays in the hands of Money, it is not at all a RELATIONSHIP

More than money , I think it is the egos concerned , which break most relationships.

Where either side is willing to do away with ego , the relationships can most often be mended.

Consider the number of relationships in filmdom that break down ; money is very rarely the reason. The reason given is mostly incompatibility , which is another way of saying that the egos were in conflict.

Consider the most famous breakup of recent times viz. Mukesh and Anil Ambani - what was the reason ? Money certainly , but more than that I think it was their egos , with neither willing to bow to the other , even though in Hindu society , age commands its own respect.

No, money is big thing but not the everything of life.

It doesnot play the role in relitionship.