Big giants use filtering & pilfering information for the enrichment of their goals ( may be political/ commercials). Obviously,towards increasing the bottom line.In the name of business, exploiting the mass through technology is not at all accepted.This is nothing new technique but the one followed since East India Company, India.
By
KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed
| 03 26 2010 05:55:24 +0000
Every thing in this world has a cost involved,regarding the practice of filtering the content on the internet ,this if not stopped right in the begginning will ruin the quality and transparency/accuracy of the information access,which will have severe impact on the concept of the Global Village . In the modern world each and every aspect of everyday life in some way or other is effected by the internet and filtering information on internet will turn out to be a serious drawback. Atleast for me their in no point in hiding ,it is required only when u r doing something you can't stand with or u r ashame of,so i personally don't understand policies of Chinese Government and fully support Google's decision .
By
SAURABH THAKUR, SOFTWARE TEST ENGINEER, QA InfoTech
| 03 26 2010 05:02:58 +0000
A knife can be used to cut vegetables (and feed people) or can be used to commit murder. So given the premise that access to knowledge is one of the main purposes behing internet growth, aany restriction is unacceptable. Benjamin Franklin once said "anyone who is prepared to sacrifice a bit of liberty to get a bit of security deserves neither liberty nor security!" I think it is one of the most profound statements ever.
By
RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants
| 03 26 2010 04:37:44 +0000
|
They have right to do so.Companies even in the globalization era should be above the law they should abide law , concerns of any individual or country and should follow ethics.
By
anand vashta, Project Manager, cross
| 04 07 2010 07:08:13 +0000
No, it is not correct. Every country has its own priorities and concerns. Therefore, it is not correct to criticize the countries. These companies are not the rollers of any country. They are making the tools to facilitate the people. Every country has a right to see whether the tool really useful or any harm is existed. When the tool has any harmful things to the their society, it is the local government decision to control and regulate it.
By
Kumara Swamy, Project Associate, IIIT-H
| 03 26 2010 04:01:10 +0000
Criticism is the easiest way out. And big money does talk big! I remember the time (almost a decade ago) when VSNL had provided a statement to the High Court in India why it was impossible to block access to Adult sites (or inappropriate sites). It was left to the individuals (or public users) to use content filtering software/tools at the user level. Given the good intentions, it does have its price. What is the trade-off costs? Having worked with international schools for a decade I know it is in the best interests. Having said that, what are the options that are available? Are the giants providing safer alternatives?
By
Sameer Pradhan, Solutions Architect - Presales, CSS Corp
| 03 25 2010 09:11:15 +0000
|