Build your professional network on facebook via our app Go to app
 
<< Prev  2 of 2 in Topic 
Topic : Regulating the internet
  Rate : 
Posted in Community :

Tech World

 
Created by : Smita Dalvi, Sales/BD Manager, Hewlett-Packard  | 03 25 2010 08:21:39 +0000
Industry : InternetFunctional Area : New Technologies(Technology)
Activity:  265 views;  last activity : 07 06 2010 20:18:09 +0000

Google, Microsoft and Yahoo are among many high-tech companies that have objected to the Australian government’s plan to begin filtering Internet content. Approximately, 147 comments were submitted to the government on its proposal to begin blocking certain Web sites – particularly those that present harm to children. But the high-tech industry and many human rights groups object to the filtering of Internet content and taking the control of Internet access out of the hands of users.

Google yesterday announced it stopped censoring content in China, as demanded by the Chinese government, by redirecting search queries from within China to the company’s Hong Kong site. Facebook has explained in the earlier this month that it has watched the moves in Australia with concern.

So users, are Tech giants doing the right thing by criticising countries planning Internet filtering?

 
 Refer 1414
Share
 
 
  Rate : 
 
 
Yes Vs No
9
 
 
 
 
11
5
8
Support   Support
Top Argument
3
0

I am not a techi but I feel 'filtering' is the biggest virus with which internet could ever be infected.

Yes, there are some severe concerns like terror propaganda, children porn etc that should be dealt with all stringent measures that countries all together can apply at the very root & at the very earliest.

But I find that after once filtering starts the intrinsic politics 'd be inevitable & the net today as it connects people to people of this entire world 'd find itself connecting countries to countries....& borders to borders.

Thanks Smita for the referral.


By ujjval jain, Retail, Retail  03 25 2010 09:13:16 +0000
 
Top Argument
3
0

I don't think they are doing the right thing by criticising country's planning of Internet filtering. Every country has got some privacy norms which it doesn't want to share with others. For example, China didn't want Google to disclose its secrets which might not have been good for its privacy. Similarly Australian government wants to filter certain websites which are not good for children. The country is thinking of its good whereas these companies are thinking of their profits. They should respect the intentions of the country where they are working in.


By Smita Dalvi, Sales/BD Manager, Hewlett-Packard  03 25 2010 08:27:23 +0000
0
0

Google, Microsoft and Yahoo are among many high-tech companies that have objected to the Australian government's plan to begin filtering Internet content.


By ravindra shrivastava, Information Systems(MIS)-Manager, iifs pvt ltd  | 03 26 2010 12:20:25 +0000
0
0

Big giants use filtering & pilfering information for the enrichment of their goals ( may be political/ commercials). Obviously,towards increasing the bottom line.In the name of business, exploiting the mass through technology is not at all accepted.This is nothing new technique but the one followed since East India Company, India.


By KALIYAMOORTHY , Oil & Gas Area Coordinator, Undisclosed  | 03 26 2010 05:55:24 +0000
0
0

Every thing in this world has a cost involved,regarding the practice of filtering the content on the internet ,this if not stopped right in the begginning will ruin the quality and transparency/accuracy of the information access,which will have severe impact on the concept of the Global Village .

In the modern world each and every aspect of everyday life in some way or other is effected by the  internet and filtering information on internet will turn out to be a serious drawback.

Atleast for me their in no point in hiding ,it is required only when u r doing something you can't stand with or u r ashame of,so i personally don't understand policies of Chinese Government and fully support Google's decision .  


By SAURABH THAKUR, SOFTWARE TEST ENGINEER, QA InfoTech  | 03 26 2010 05:02:58 +0000
0
0

A knife can be used to cut vegetables (and feed people) or can be used to commit murder.

So given the premise that access to knowledge is one of the main purposes behing internet growth, aany restriction is unacceptable.

Benjamin Franklin once said "anyone who is prepared to sacrifice a bit of liberty to get a bit of security deserves neither liberty nor security!"

I think it is one of the most profound statements ever.


By RAMESH KANDADAI, Principal Consultant, ARM Consultants  | 03 26 2010 04:37:44 +0000
0
0

They have right to do so.Companies even in the globalization era should be above the law they should abide law , concerns of any individual or country and should follow ethics.


By anand vashta, Project Manager, cross  | 04 07 2010 07:08:13 +0000
0
0

what Australia is doing technically regulating the internet for their country


By mun jas, IT consutling & network architect  | 03 28 2010 17:41:53 +0000
0
0

regulation of internet is imperative and critical.


By mun jas, IT consutling & network architect  | 03 28 2010 17:31:31 +0000
0
0

It is not correct...

it should be forbidden..


By Jyoti Ranjan, Software QA Engineer  | 03 26 2010 13:42:53 +0000
0
0

No, it is not correct. Every country has its own priorities and concerns. Therefore, it is not correct to criticize the countries. These companies are not the rollers of any country. They are making the tools to facilitate the people. Every country has a right to see whether the tool really useful or any harm is existed. When the tool has any harmful things to the their society, it is the local government decision to control and regulate it.


By Kumara Swamy, Project Associate, IIIT-H  | 03 26 2010 04:01:10 +0000
1
0

Criticism is the easiest way out. And big money does talk big!

I remember the time (almost a decade ago) when VSNL had provided a statement to the High Court in India why it was impossible to block access to Adult sites (or inappropriate sites). It was left to the individuals (or public users) to use content filtering software/tools at the user level.

Given the good intentions, it does have its price. What is the trade-off costs? Having worked with international schools for a decade I know it is in the best interests.

Having said that, what are the options that are available? Are the giants providing safer alternatives?


By Sameer Pradhan, Solutions Architect - Presales, CSS Corp  | 03 25 2010 09:11:15 +0000
0
0

Local policies prevails upon global policies


By Shiv Onkar Kumar, Project Manager, Misys International Financial Systems  | 03 25 2010 08:56:44 +0000
Leading recruitment firm
Leading recruitment firm
Viewers also viewed
The world's biggest social networking site Facebook faces a unique challenge next week when it...
 
1089 referals 21 arguments, 366 views
SEO vs Digital Marketing
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 140 views
According to a report by the Pew Internet and American Life Project, internet users does not...
 
162 referals 15 arguments, 521 views
more...  
Recent Knowledge (4)
WE HAD A GOOD NUMBER OF INVENTORS WITH GREATER VISION ABOUT THE SOCIETY. INVENTORS HERE NEED NOT...
 
2 referals 2 arguments, 107 views
C vs B
 
0 referals 3 arguments, 51 views
Nirmal Baba is a fraud vs Nirmal Baba is a Saint
 
513 referals 6 arguments, 45 views
more...  
More From Author
We are still talking about Indo-Pak relations. After Osama being found there many tend to believe that the nation is encouraginf terrorism. In between all this TATA is here, willing to launch Nano in Pakistan. TATA NANO world's cheapest car will...
What an idea sirji .. Thanks for sharing it here Mr. Rajeev.. It would surely help many..
When you need to write a report, a paper or any article, first thing that comes to your mind is MS office.. We haev been using it since ages and we are used to it. But a Texas judge has ordered Microsoft to stop selling its Microsoft Word...
more...